Avoids waste for pipelines that don't use all the shaders, and is
flexible enough to cover cases where there are multiple variants per
shader (e.g. SIMD8/16/32 for fragment shader).
Even though we could pre-calculate the exact size of the array, this
is not a critical path so it is worth preventing the bug that will
likely happen when new variants are added but not accounted for.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4040>
This will avoid generating multiple identical fences in a row.
For Gen11+ we have multiple types of fences (affecting different
variable modes), but is still better to combine them in a single
scoped barrier so that the translation to backend IR have the option
of dispatching both fences in parallel.
This will clean up redundant barriers from various
dEQP-VK.memory_model.* tests.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Tested-by: Marge Bot <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/3224>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/3224>
SPIR-V generates very granular barriers, however HW and backends might
not necessarily take advantage of those. This pass provides a general
mechanism to combine such barriers.
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/3224>
There was another enum entry in the draft versions of
nir_memory_semantics, but when it got dropped the entries were not
updated.
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/3224>
In ISL, usage flags only carry intent and not semantic meaning. We
don't have a bulletproof way in ISL to specify that an image is of
depth/stencil type. The usage flags are great but blorp, for instance,
loves to disrespect them. One proposed solution to this problem is to
add explicit depth/stencil formats which are distinct from the
corresponding color formats.
Fortunately, however, empirical evidence suggests that this bit only
affects the sampler's interpretation of the CCS data. Therefore, we can
set the bit based off of the aux_usage which is now very specific and
does carry semantic meaning. In particular, aux_usage now makes a
distinction between color CCS and depth/stencil CCS which appears to be
exactly what the DepthStencilResource bit is for.
Reviewed-by: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.chery@intel.com>
Tested-by: Marge Bot <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4056>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4056>
Stencil CCS is slightly different from color CCS. Using a color CCS
resolve with stencil CCS doesn't do the right thing and you can't sample
from a stencil CCS image without the DepthStencilResource bit set or you
will get the wrong data. Stencil CCS also has it's own rules such as it
doesn't support fast-clear and has no partial resolve. This seems to
indicate that it should probably be its own isl_aux_usage. Now that
adding new isl_aux_usage values is pretty cheap, let's split stencil CCS
out on its own.
Reviewed-by: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.chery@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4056>
We also delete the badly named isl_surf_supports_hiz_ccs_wt. The name
is misleading because it doesn't return whether or not the surface
supports HiZ+CCS in write-through mode (any single-sampled HiZ+CCS
capable surface does) but rather a heuristic decision about whether or
not we want to enable write-through mode based on the usage flags in the
isl_surf.
Reviewed-by: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.chery@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4056>
Previously, we always set the aux_usage to ISL_AUX_USAGE_HIZ_CCS and let
ISL choose write-through based on isl_surf_supports_hiz_ccs_wt. This
commit makes us choose explicitly at surface creation time whether to
use HIZ_CCS or HIZ_CCS_WT based on the same set of conditions. This is
more explicit and should be more robust as it lets us choose WT mode in
one place rather than trusting isl_surf_supports_hiz_ccs_wt to return
the same thing every time.
Reviewed-by: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.chery@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4056>
This is distinct from ISL_AUX_USAGE_HIZ_CCS in that the HiZ surface
operates in write-through mode which means that the HiZ surface is only
used for depth-testing acceleration and the CCS-compressed main surface
is always valid so we can texture from it.
Separating full HiZ from write-through mode at the isl_aux_usage level
has a couple of advantages:
1. It's more explicit. Instead of write-through mode depending on the
heuristic decision in isl_surf_supports_hiz_ccs_wt, it's now
something that's explicitly requested by the driver. This should be
more robust than hoping isl_surf_supports_hiz_ccs_wt always returns
the same thing every time. If someone (say BLORP) ever drops a
usage flag on the isl_surf, there's a chance it could return a
different value without us noticing leading to corruptions.
2. Because ISL_AUX_USAGE_HIZ_CCS_WT is it's own isl_aux_usage flag, we
can say inside the driver that HIZ_CCS does not support sampling but
HIZ_CCS_WT does. We can also pass HIZ_CCS_WT to isl_surf_fill_state
and it can do some validation for us beyond what we would be able to
do if we conflate HIZ_CCS_WT and CCS_E.
3. In the future, we can add new heuristics to the driver which do
things such as start all depth surfaces (regardless of usage flags)
off in HIZ_CCS and then do a full resolve and drop to HIZ_CCS_WT the
first time it gets used by the sampler. This would potentially let
us enable the faster HIZ_CCS mode even in cases where it technically
comes in through the API as a texture.
Reviewed-by: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.chery@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4056>
The first check is redundant because the first thing we do in the "emit
the aux surface" section is assert that we actually have an aux_surf.
The second check involves an exclusion list of things which don't have
aux surfaces on Gen12 but an inclusion list is much simpler because it's
just "does it have MCS?".
Reviewed-by: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.chery@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4056>
Currently when lowering mod() we add an extra instruction so if
mod(a,b) == b then 0 is returned instead of b, as mathematically
mod(a,b) is in the interval [0, b).
But Vulkan spec has relaxed this restriction, and allows the result to
be in the interval [0, b].
For the OpenGL case, while the spec does not allow this behaviour, due
the allowed precision errors we can end up having the same result, so
from a practical point of view, this behaviour is allowed (see
https://github.com/KhronosGroup/VK-GL-CTS/issues/51).
This commit takes this in account to remove the extra instruction
required to return 0 instead.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Schürmann <daniel@schuermann.dev>
Signed-off-by: Juan A. Suarez Romero <jasuarez@igalia.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4118>
There are multiple LLVM passes that very much move the
intrinsic using the descriptor outside of the loop, defeating
the entire point of creating the loop.
Defeat the optimizer by splitting the break into a separate
if-statement and putting an optimization barrier on the bool
in between.
v2: Move from a callback based system to begin/end loop.
This does not make it significantly less intrusive but
is a bit nicer with all the extra struct and callback
stubs.
v3: Deal with non-divergent values in divergent path.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/issues/2160
Fixes: 028ce52739 "radv: Add non-uniform indexing lowering."
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Marge Bot <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4109>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4109>
Some hardware doesn't support subgroup shuffle, and on such hardware
it makes no sense to lower quad broadcasts to shuffle. Instead, let's
lower them to four const quad broadcasts, paired with bcsel instructions.
Cc: mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Timur Kristóf <timur.kristof@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4147>
Once LCRA has run, we have a map from IR indices to byte offsets into
the register file, so we need to "install" these results, rewriting the
IR to use native registers and fixing up writemasks/swizzles to
substitute vectorization for adjacent registers (for LCRA, we're
modeling in terms of real vectors).
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Marge Bot <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4158>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4158>
We model the machine as vector (with restrictions) to natively handle
mixed types and I/O and other goodies. We use LCRA for the heavylifting.
This commit adds only the modeling to feed into LCRA and spit LCRA
solutions back; next commit will integrate it with the IR.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4158>
We want types to be consistent throughout the IR so we don't have to
make exceptions to parse things out. These cases just got missed.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4158>
The issue was messing with liveness analysis... with Midgard we look at
the writemask to decide how the instruction behaves. Here, since our ALU
is scalar (except for subdivision which doesn't have proper writemasks
anyway) we just look at the component count directly -- either 4 for
vector instructions (essentially - for smaller loads we can replicate
manually without much burden), or 1 for scalar.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4158>
