The problem occurs with a series of instructions build the subgroup
invocation value :
mov(8) g23<1>UW 0x76543210V
add(8) g23.8<1>UW g23<8,8,1>UW 0x0008UW
add(16) g23.16<1>UW g23<16,16,1>UW 0x0010UW
Our register spilling code operates on physical registers (64B on
Xe2+) and using the brw_inst::is_partial_write() helper only considers
32B registers. So the spiller doesn't see that the add(16) instruction
is doing a partial write and ends up discarding the previous value.
You can reproduce the issue by running a test like :
INTEL_DEBUG=spill_fs ./deqp-vk -n dEQP-VK.compute.pipeline.cooperative_matrix.khr_a.subgroupscope.constant.uint8_uint8.buffer.rowmajor.linear
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Fixes: aa494cbacf ("brw: align spilling offsets to physical register sizes")
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/33642>
Since brw_inst now has the block it belongs and the block can
reach the shader, the only necessary information to create a
builder is the brw_inst itself.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/33815>
Our name for this enum was brw_message_target, but it's better known as
shared function ID or SFID. Call it brw_sfid to make it easier to find.
Now that brw only supports Gfx9+, we don't particularly care whether
SFIDs were introduced on Gfx4, Gfx6, or Gfx7.5. Also, the LSC SFIDs
were confusingly tagged "GFX12" but aren't available on Gfx12.0; they
were introduced with Alchemist/Meteorlake.
GFX6_SFID_DATAPORT_SAMPLER_CACHE in particular was confusing. It sounds
like the SFID to use for the sampler on Gfx6+, however it has nothing to
do with the sampler at all. BRW_SFID_SAMPLER remains the sampler SFID.
On Haswell, we ran out of messages on the main data cache data port, and
so they introduced two additional ones, for more messages. The modern
Tigerlake PRMs simply call these DP_DC0, DP_DC1, and DP_DC2. I think
the "sampler" name came from some idea about reorganizing messages that
never materialized (instead, the LSC came as a much larger cleanup).
Recently we've adopted the term "HDC" for the legacy data cluster, as
opposed to "LSC" for the modern Load/Store Cache. To make clear which
SFIDs target the legacy HDC dataports, we use BRW_SFID_HDC0/1/2.
We were also citing the G45, Sandybridge, and Ivybridge PRMs for a
compiler that supports none of those platforms. Cite modern docs.
Reviewed-by: Caio Oliveira <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/33650>
Xe3+ benefits from packing register allocations tightly in order to
make optimal use of the GRF space. The round-robin heuristic
previously in use often causes the whole GRF space to be used even if
register pressure is substantially lower, which would severely
decrease thread-level parallelism on Xe3+.
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/32664>
