The main purpose of the edge zone is to detect palms in the area where we
cannot assume a full finger size and thus cannot use any other palm detection
mechanism. 8mm should be large enough that a finger should be detected based
on other properties (size, pressure, ...).
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103330
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit ed52002c8d)
If we're adding an element that's not null or not a freshly initialized list,
chances are we haven't removed it from a previous list.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 28ef7456d3)
A touchpad that was disabled by toggling the sendevents option would come back
normally after a lid resume, despite still being nominally disabled.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448962
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 53d53dd18e)
Devices tagged as accelerometers may also be other devices like tablet pads.
Only ignore pure accelerometer devices but disable the accelerometer axes for
devices that have multiple types.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102100
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gerecke <jason.gerecke@wacom.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7d97bb0087)
We don't know the position of the third finger on 2-slot touchpads, differing
between swipe and pinch is reliable. Simply disable 3-finger pinch and always
use swipe; 3fg pinch is uncommon anyway and it's better to have one of the
gestures working reliably than both unreliably.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6d435cda06)
The lid dispatch interface is a one-trick pony and can only handle SW_LID. It
ignores other switches but crashes on any event type other than EV_SW and
EV_SYN. Disable those types so we just ignore the event instead of asserting.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101853
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gerecke <jason.gerecke@wacom.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6bb05c594a)
If a timer_func causes the removal or addition of a different timer, our tmp
pointer from the list_for_each_safe may not be valid anymore.
This was triggered by having the debounce code trigger a middle button state
change, which caused that timer to be cancelled.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 6d0edf9d07)
Race conditions may happen where code that cancels a timer is called just
as that timer triggers. If we cancel a timer, we assume that we've put the
code into a state where the timer firing will trigger a bug.
This could be observed with the middle button code if the release event was
held back just long enough. The button release code cancelled the timer, set
the state back to idle and then complained when the timeout handling sent a
'timeout' event while being in idle.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 696fdff247)
If the kernel sends us a button press for a button that is thought to be down
we have lost track of the state of the button. Ignore the button press event,
in the hope that the next release makes things right again.
A release event may be masked if another process grabs the device for some
period of time, e.g. libinput debug-events --grab.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101796
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 399c50dbeb)
If the keyboard is removed while dwt thinks it is in active state, that state
is never reset and subsequent touches are ignored.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101743
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 9e5d1df4bb)
Most modern touchpads are around 100mm wide, so this provides a ca 8mm edge
zone on each side. The extra 3mm should provide for more reliable palm
detection, a few touches happen to be just on the edge of the 5mm mark.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101433
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 381cce8ddd)
Do so on the synaptics serial touchpads at least, they're known to cause
cursor jumps when the third finger is down. Not detecting a tap move means
three-finger taps get more reliable on these touchpads.
This change affects gestures who now effectively have to wait for the tap
timeout to happen. It's a trade-off.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101435https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455443
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Fixes compiler warning:
evdev.c:2899:2: warning: 'pri' may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
On unreliable tablets (Surface3), always force the lid switch to open when the
paired keyboard is removed. This way the lid can't be stuck in a closed state
when there's nothing attached that can actually trigger that state.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101100
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
On unreliable LID switches, we might have the LID declared as closed
while it is actually not. We can not wait for the first switch event to setup
the keyboard listener: it will never occur.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101099
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
What we do not want is libinput to believe the LID is closed while
it's not. But the internal notifier state need to be in sync with the evdev
node, or it's going to be a pain setting the keyboard listener.
But since we don't know if the state is reliable, we track the internal state
separately from the external state so that we can set up the keyboard listener
when the lid is closed, without having libinput actually send lid closed
events for unreliable devices.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101099
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Only pair if the keyboard is either tagged as internal device.
This has another (unlikely) behaviour change: previously we would override the
paired keyboards with ones that look more accurate (e.g. a usb keyboard paired
before a serial would be unpaired and the serial keyboard takes its place).
Now we assume there can only be one internal keyboard, once we have it we
ignore all others. This shouldn't matter in real life provided the tagging is
correct.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We have heuristics for detecting whether a keyboard is internal or external,
but in some cases (e.g. Surface 3) these heuristics fail. Add a udev property
that we can apply to these cases so we have something that's reliable.
This will likely eventually become ID_INPUT_KEYBOARD_INTEGRATION as shipped by
systemd, similar to the touchpad property.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101101
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
commit 3925936 introduced changes to container_of, this is hopefully the
last part of it.
In the linux kernel, container_of() takes a type name, and not a
variable. Without this, in some cases it is needed to declare an unused
variable in order to call container_of().
example:
return container_of(dispatch, struct fallback_dispatch, base);
instead of:
struct fallback_dispatch *p;
return container_of(dispatch, p, base);
This introduce also list_first_entry(), a simple wrapper around
container_of() to retrieve the first element of a non empty list. It
allows to simplify list_for_each() and list_for_each_safe().
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Laskar <gabriel@lse.epita.fr>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
gcc and clang supports offsetof (defined in stddef.h) as defined by C99
and POSIX.1-2001, use it in container_of.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Laskar <gabriel@lse.epita.fr>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This was originally left outside of the button areas in case users tap in
those zones, but we're getting false tap events in that zone.
On a 100mm touchpad, the edge zone is merely 5mm, it's acceptable to ignore
taps in that area even in the software button. We can revisit this if we see
tap detection failures in the future.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415796
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Because otherwise things go boom, but unless you passed -fshort-enums this
shouldn't happen anyway. And gcc's documentation says don't do that. So don't
do that, or we'll scream at you.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
../src/libinput.c:56:17: warning: passing an object that undergoes default
argument promotion to 'va_start' has undefined behavior [-Wvarargs]
The enum's size is compiler-defined, so the enum gets promoted to whatever the
compiler chose. That promotion is undefined, so let's use an int here.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
Fixes a bunch of warnings of the kind
../src/evdev.h:378:32: warning: variable 'f' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
return container_of(dispatch, f, base);
Just typecasting NULL means we can ignore sample but for the type.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100976
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
clang supports __typeof__ which was the only real difference. Not sure any
other compilers matter (that don't support __typeof__)
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
If the event listener is added, then removed again on a lid switch on/off
event, the list is set to null. This can trigger two crashes:
* when the keyboard is removed first, the call to
libinput_device_remove_event_listener() dereferences the null pointer
* when the switch is removed first, the call to device_destroy will find a
remaining event listener and assert
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440927
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Sequence triggered by the xorg driver, but basically: if the touchpad is
destroyed before the lid switch, the event listener wasn't removed and an
assertion was triggered.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Instead of reimplementing a for loop every time.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The Elantech touchpad model binding in udev is currently unused, since
pressure values were moved to a udev binding of their own.
This gets rid of the deprecated model binding.
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@paulk.fr>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is for debugging purposes only, we cannot guarantee that event timestamps
always go up - at least not across devices. Example: tapping on a touchpad may
delay an event until a timeout expires, but that event is then sent with the
original touch timestamps (i.e. in the past). If any other device produces
events during that timeout period, our timestamps are out-of-order.
This isn't really a bug because we are forced to do that, but for bug-fixing
it can be useful to detect.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
