For some tests we need to string multiple event sequences together into one
event frame. Use a push/pop frame approach that stops litest from sending any
EV_SYN/SYN_REPORT events, so we can merge two touches together by e.g.
litest_push_event_frame(d);
litest_touch_down(d, 0, 10, 10);
litest_touch_down(d, 1, 20, 50);
litest_pop_event_frame(d);
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Rather than a random msleep() with a comment, use a helper function that
describes what we're waiting for. Also makes changing the timeouts easier in
the future.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2-finger scrolling only, we don't have anything else yet
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Make check_2fg_scroll functionality available outside of touchpad.c ,
no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Most trackpoint users want to be able to scroll using the trackpoint with
the middle button pressed, add support for this.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We may be in the middle of a software button click or a tap, so make sure we
go back to the device-neutral state by unwinding.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Doing a tap-and-drag gesture but just holding the finger instead of moving
should trigger a timeout and still switchin into tap-and-drag.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
For adding a litest device to an existing context.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The litest features overlap with the litest device specifiers, so it's easy to
pass in LITEST_MOUSE where LITEST_POINTER should be passed in, and vice versa.
Lacking proper type checking the best we can do here is simply move the
devices into the negative range and check for that.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The most common error running the test suite is not running as root, but the
error message is hard to interpret. Make it more explicit when it failed,
printing the strerror of the errno.
Note that libevdev 1.3 is needed to get EACCES instead of EBADF
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libevdev/commit/?id=debe9b030c8069cdf78307888ef3b65830b25122
A workaround is put in place for now until libevdev 1.3 is commonplace.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This fixes the following (false positive) compiler warnings:
litest-alps-semi-mt.c: In function 'alps_touch_move':
litest-alps-semi-mt.c:163:3: warning: 'b' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
send_abs_mt_xy(d, r, b);
^
litest-alps-semi-mt.c:163:3: warning: 'r' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
litest-alps-semi-mt.c: In function 'alps_touch_down':
litest-alps-semi-mt.c:127:3: warning: 'b' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
send_abs_mt_xy(d, r, b);
^
litest-alps-semi-mt.c:127:3: warning: 'r' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
It should be possible to initiate a drag by tapping-drag, but continue
it by pressing a physical button continuing to drag by subsequent finger
motions.
As the generic evdev layer helps us ignore multiple button presses we
can have the tap machine run completely separate from and uneffected by
regular physical button presses, making the tap FSM much simpler than
adding new states for handling button presse life times from outside
of the tap state machine.
A touchpad test is updated to test click while tapping instead of tap
FSM break out. The updated test is re-added but only for clickpads only.
The tap FSM svg is updated to say "clickpad button press" instead of
"phys button press".
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Allows to set CK_VERBOSITY to be set to "silent", "minimal", "normal", or
"verbose". Falls back to CK_NORMAL if unset.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
New configuration API:
libinput_device_config_calibration_has_matrix()
libinput_device_config_calibration_set_matrix()
libinput_device_config_calibration_get_matrix()
libinput_device_config_calibration_get_default_matrix()
Deprecates libinput_device_calibrate().
For coordinate transformation, we're using a precalculated matrix. Thus, to
support ..._get_matrix() we need to store the original user-specified matrix
separately, in an unmangled state.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Basic tests for rotation, translation and scaling events.
Note that tests need to be added separately for single-touch and touch
devices, this is a restriction of the litest framework.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
With a non-zero absmin for both axes and different ranges for x/y, just to
detect those errors.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
litest_wait_for_event() returns if any event is available.
litest_wait_for_event_of_type(... type, type, type, -1) returns if any of the
given event types is availble. All other events are discarded.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The goal of -static was to avoid the libtool wrappers for easier debugging.
The -no-install flag does exactly that, without requiring static linking.
Related to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82292
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
When removing a device, its not guaranteed that all button or key
presses have been released, resulting in an invalid seat wide button
count.
Note that kernel devices normally will send release events when being
unplugged, but this won't happen when removing a device from the path
backend.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The kernel may send a 'release' event without ever having sent a key
'pressed' event in case the key was pressed before libinput was
initiated. Ignore these events so that we always guarantee a release
event always comes after a pressed event for any given key or button.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
When overriding events of a test device, if one would enable an event
that was already enabled by default for the overridden device, an assert
checking if the event was already enabled would fail and cause the test
to fail.
Since the merging of the default and overriding event lists is implemented
by simply concatinating them letting libevdev deal with ignoring
superfluous event enabling, remove the assert to allow the implementation
to work.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Some tests in test/path.c and test/udev.c are not dependent on
device behaviour but rather managing of device lifetime etc. Run those
tests only once with only one device, resulting more or less the same
code coverage but shorter run time.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Provides the bounding box only, with slot 0 always being the upper/left, slot
1 being the lower-right touch. This needs to use the touch_down etc. litest
interfaces, which are now widened to double (leftover from 489630f58) and a
device-specific private pointer in the litest device.
New device feature for litest: LITEST_SEMI_MT
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Set BTN_TOUCH, BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP automatically depending on the number of
fingers down.
This emulates real event sequences a bit better than the current approach,
though it's not a 100% correct emulation:
1) On real devices, BTN_* are usually sent last before the SYN_REPORT - here
they are sent first to slot in with the custom, device-specific event
sequence. We should only ever look at the complete sequence anyway, so this
shouldn't matter.
2) On real devices, the switch from BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP to TRIPLETAP and vice
versa is not always toggled within the same SYN_REPORT
3) On synaptics devices, BTN_TOUCH is released in the frame where
BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP is set. It is then immediately set again in the next
frame. With the current litest framework this is hard to integrate, so we
just leave BTN_TOUCH set the whole time, which is what MT devices do if
they don't have BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Some tests doesn't use or doesn't need to use the test device
automatically created when adding a test case for certain types of
devices. For these tests, to shorten test run time, don't create the
test devices that would be ignored.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
More expressive in the caller and less ambiguous about return values (is it 1?
is it non-zero? can it be negative?)
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
They don't set resolution so we can't calculate the size but we know they're
big enough to need palm detection.
And fix the descriptor for the bcm5974. For some reason this was advertising
synaptics coordinates. Fix it to represent (one of) the apple touchpads.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
On small touchpads, a touch that intends to go across the width of the
touchpad is likely to start in the edge zone. Likewise, on those touchpads the
chances of a palm event happening on the edge is small.
A minimum width of 8cm determined by an elaborate process of completely
unscientific guesswork: the x220 is roughly 7.5cm across and doesn't suffer
much from edge events, the T440s is 10cm across and definitely suffers from
it. So the trigger width likely somewhere in between which makes 8cm about as
valid as any other guess.
Note that this disables palm detection for resolution-less touchpads too - if
we don't know how big the touchpad is we can't know if palm detection on the
edges is necessary.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Any legitimate finger movement that starts in the palm area is expected to
move out of the palm area at an angle roughly orthogonal to the edge of the
touchpad. Check for the direction of the movement vector, and if it is within
the accepted cardinal/ordinal directions then proceed.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
On small touchpads a touch that is intended to traverse much of the screen
width may start at the very edge, i.e. in the palm zone.
In that case, and if the touch moves out of the palm zone quickly enough, drop
the palm label and make it a normal touchpoint.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
A large part of palm events are situated on the far edges of the touchpad. In
a test run on a T440s while typing a long email all but 2 touch points were
located in the outer ~5% of the touchpad. Define a 5% exclusion zone on the
left and right edges in which new touchpoint is automatically assigned to be a
palm.
A finger may move into that exclusion zone without being marked as palm, it
just can't start in one.
On clickpads, the exclusion zone does not extend into the software buttons.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Until uinput gets that capability (likely not before 3.17) all we can do is a
racy approach of setting it after creating it. That won't work well for
anything test where libinput is already listening to udev when the device is
created, but it does work for those cases where libinput is started after the
device was initialized.
And it's a better alternative than not testing anything dependent on
resolution settings.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
This breaks when we have a device resolution set on the test devices,
specificially on the T440. The current tests use a delta of 1% of the device
which with the resolution set results in an effective delta of 3 - above the
scroll threshold.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Using a 0-100% range is useful but in some cases we need events with finer
than 1% granularity.
And fix up the two-finger test that now fails. This was a bug in the test
anyway, the dx/dy supplied here was 1% of the touchpad width. Confined to
integers this meant we only ever had the touch down, then the single move by
1%. That caused two events - not enough to satisfy tp_estimate_delta, so we
always had a delta of 0/0 regardless of the size of the move.
Now with doubles this fails, so drop it to 0.1% instead, which is small enough
on all touchpads we currently have.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
