The bit moved on gen12 in order to prepare for dual-SIMD8 dispatch.
This implementation isn't an entirely complete as it only works on SIMD8
and SIMD16 and not dual-SIMD8.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Apparently the ts_request_type and ts_resource_select thread spawner
message descriptor bits were removed from the hardware at least since
ICL. Drop them in order to avoid assertion failures on Gen12+
platforms which don't have any encoding for this. On Gen9+ these are
probably just ignored by the hardware, so this is unlikely to have had
any functional implications prior to Gen12.
v2: Mark TS message fields as non-existing in brw_inst.h on ICL. (Caio)
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
The WAIT instruction has been removed, but SYNC.bar can be used
instead to wait for a notification on n0.0.
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Apparently this field was removed on SKL, and according to the
hardware docs for previous platforms "This field is only valid for a
ForwardMsg message. It is ignored for other messages. The BarrierMsg
message always increments the N0 notification counter".
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Confirmed no regressions after a full Piglit run on TGL with the
brw_fs_test_dispatch_packing() test enabled.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
They look like a NULL source if you don't look at the address mode.
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
The following fix-up by Jordan Justen is squashed in:
intel/eu/validate: gen12 send instruction doesn't have a dst type field
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
src0 will typically be null for this instruction.
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Due to hardware bug filed as HSDES#1604601757.
v2: Only return if result of fs_inst::can_do_source_mods() is known to
be false for the case new orthogonal restrictions are implemented
below in the future. (Caio)
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Kept as a separate commit in order to avoid distracting reviewers of
the software scoreboard pass with memory management boilerplate.
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Gen12+ hardware lacks the register scoreboard logic that used to
guarantee data coherency between register reads and writes in previous
generations. This lowering pass runs after register allocation in
order to make up for it.
It works by performing global dataflow analysis in order to determine
the set of potential dependencies of every instruction in the shader,
and then inserts any required SWSB annotations and additional SYNC
instructions in order to guarantee data coherency.
v2: Drop unnecessary _safe list iteration (Caio).
v3: Temporarily workaround potential WaR hazard between FPU
instruction and subsequent out-of-order write, pending
clarification from the hardware team. Drop redundant tracking of
implicit access of acc0-1, since the hardware guarantees coherency
of these (but not the other accumulators...).
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewers are encouraged to audit the code generation pass
independently for the case I missed some potential data hazard or new
code has been added in the meantime.
v2: Add SYNC instruction to cr0 workaround in brw_float_controls_mode().
v3: Drop likely redundant (and potentially harmful) RegDist SWSB
annotation from ce0 read in brw_find_live_channel() (Caio).
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
An effect similar to the one formerly provided by setting thread
control to "switch" can be achieved now by setting a RegDist of 1 on
the SWSB field.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
A future lowering pass will simulate the same behavior originally
provided by NoDDChk/NoDDClr at the IR level by using appropriate SWSB
annotations.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
The new SEND instruction behaves like the former SENDS instruction.
The original single-payload SEND instruction is gone.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
The SEND instruction is now four-source. The descriptor is no longer
part of source 1, so avoid touching it to avoid corruption while
initializing the descriptor.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Quite a lot of churn because the encoding of most hardware opcodes has
changed unfortunately.
v2: Split dot-product description fixes to separate patch (Caio).
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
On Gen12, 64 bit immediate constants are loaded in reverse order. Lower
32 bit gets loaded from bit 96-127 and higher 32 bits from 64-95 in
instruction encoding.
Signed-off-by: Sagar Ghuge <sagar.ghuge@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
These caught a few bugs during the development of this series.
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
The encoding of almost every instruction field has changed in Gen12,
so this involves adding a Gen12+ bitfield spec to every brw_inst
macro. In addition some new macros are required to handle certain
discontiguous and variable-length fields.
This commit doesn't actually include the Gen12 updated bitfield specs,
only the macros are extended here for reviewability.
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
v2: Rename FDC() to FFDC() and FDC1() to FDC() for consistency with
the existing F() and FF() macros.
This edge doesn't exist in the original scalar program, but it
represents a potential control flow path the EU will take in cases
where control flow isn't uniform across channels of the same SIMD
thread.
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
This edge doesn't exist in the original scalar program, but it
represents a potential control flow path the EU will take in cases
where the condition isn't uniform across channels of the same SIMD
thread.
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Currently only the physical back-edge is represented, which
incidentally also leads to the exit block of the loop, but we need the
direct logical edge in addition for our logical CFG representation to
be complete.
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
