Use direct register to implement vcn 2.0 jpeg deocde
Signed-off-by: Boyuan Zhang <boyuan.zhang@amd.com>
Acked-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
VCN 2.0 uses direct register space where VCN 1.0 uses some indirect registers
Signed-off-by: Boyuan Zhang <boyuan.zhang@amd.com>
Acked-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
From VCN2.0, the RBC have different views on the registers
Signed-off-by: Leo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com>
(v2: rebase -- Nicolai)
Acked-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
This mainly removes and simplifies code that is no longer needed.
There were some issues with the DB->CB stencil copy on gfx10, so let's
just use a fragment shader blit for all ZS mappings. It's more reliable.
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
This is for drivers that can't map depth and stencil and need to blit
them to a color texture for CPU access.
This also useful for drivers using separate depth and stencil.
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
- merge all 3 functions (Z, S, ZS)
- don't write the color output
- read the value from texel.x, then write it to position.z or stencil.y
(don't use the value from texel.y or texel.z)
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
gl_SampleMaskIn is 1 when R_028BE0_PA_SC_AA_CONFIG is 0, so this commit rework the conditions
controlling this register.
Before it was set if the sctx->framebuffer had a sample count > 1.
Now we still require this condition, but we also need either:
- GL_MULTISAMPLE to be enabled
- to be executing an operation that doesn't depends on GL state using u_blitter.
This fixes the arb_sample_shading/sample_mask piglit tests on radeonsi.
Signed-off-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
If we're doing a Z -> Z MSAA blit (for example) we need to enable
msaa rasterization when drawing the quads so that we can properly
write the per-sample values.
This fixes a number of Piglit ext_framebuffer_multisample blit tests
such as ext_framebuffer_multisample/no-color 2 depth combined with
the VMware driver.
Signed-off-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
If we are discarding the whole resource, we don't care about previous contents,
and the resource storage is now unused, either because we have created new
resource storage, or because we have waited for the existing resource storage
to become unused, or because the transfer is unsynchronized.
In the last two cases this commit marks the storage as uninitialized, but only
if the resource is not host writable (in which case we can't clear the valid
range, since that would result in missed readbacks in future transfers).
In the first case, when the whole resource discard involves a reallocation, the
reallocation and subsequent rebinding already update the valid buffer range
appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Alexandros Frantzis <alexandros.frantzis@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>
The rasterizer core supported ARB_viewport_array,
but the swr layer connecting core to Gallium state
tracker only allowed one viewport.
We add support for multiple viewports to swr layer.
Reviewed-by: Alok Hota <alok.hota@intel.com>
Basically same as external for now.
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Only case we might need to handle differently in the near future
is Raven's case of displayable DCC which is not renderable. But
we don't support that yet.
Getting a DMA-buf fd and converting that to a handle using our duplicate
of that file descriptor (getting at which requires passing a
radeon_winsys pointer to the buffer_get_handle hook) makes sure of this,
since duplicated file descriptors reference the same file description
and therefore the same GEM handle namespace.
This is necessary because libdrm_amdgpu may use a different DRM file
descriptor with a separate handle namespace internally, e.g. because it
always reuses any existing amdgpu_device_handle for the same device.
amdgpu_bo_export returns a handle which is valid for that internal
file descriptor.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/110903
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Tested-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>
