Pretty much the same as the FS case. Channel select goes in the header,
V2: Less mangling.
V3: Avoid sampling at all, for degenerate swizzles.
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes <chrisf@ijw.co.nz>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Lowers ir_tg4 (from textureGather and textureGatherOffset builtins) to
SHADER_OPCODE_TG4.
The usual post-sampling swizzle workaround can't work for ir_tg4,
so avoid doing that:
* For R/G/B/A swizzles use the hardware channel select (lives in the
same dword in the header as the texel offset), and then don't do
anything afterward in the shader.
* For 0/1 swizzles blast the appropriate constant over all the output
channels instead of sampling.
V2: Avoid duplicating header enabling block
V3: Avoid sampling at all, for degenerate swizzles.
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes <chrisf@ijw.co.nz>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Adds the Gen7 message IDs, a new SHADER_OPCODE_TG4 pseudo-op, and
low-level support for emitting it via generate_tex().
V3: Updated for changes in master.
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes <chrisf@ijw.co.nz>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
When used with a cube array in VS, failed assertion in ir_validate:
Assignment count of LHS write mask channels enabled not
matching RHS vector size (3 LHS, 4 RHS).
To fix this, swizzle the RHS correctly for the writemask.
This showed up in the ARB_texture_gather tests, which exercise cube
arrays in the VS.
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes <chrisf@ijw.co.nz>
Cc: "9.2" <mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Consider only the top-left and top-right pixels to approximate DDX in a 2x2
subspan, unless the application requests a more accurate approximation via
GL_FRAGMENT_SHADER_DERIVATIVE_HINT or this optimization is disabled from the
new driconf option disable_derivative_optimization.
This results in a less accurate approximation. However, it improves the
performance of Xonotic with Ultra settings by 24.3879% +/- 0.832202% (at 95.0%
confidence) on Haswell. No noticeable image quality difference observed.
The improvement comes from faster sample_d. It seems, on Haswell, some
optimizations are introduced to allow faster sample_d when all pixels in a
subspan have the same derivative. I considered SAMPLE_STATE too, which allows
one to control the quality of sample_d on Haswell. But it gave much worse
image quality without giving better performance comparing to this change.
No piglit quick.tests regression on Haswell (tested with v1).
v2: better guess for precompile program key
Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu <olv@lunarg.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Forbes <chrisf@ijw.co.nz>
We have the destination framebuffer object passed in; there's no need to
go digging around in the context.
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes <chrisf@ijw.co.nz>
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <chad.versace@linux.intel.com>
Using it encourages the (IMHO worrying) practice of leaving member
variables uninitialized in constructor definitions. This macro
shouldn't be necessary anymore after the last patch series fixing all
its users to initialize all member variables from the class
constructor. Remove it.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
All member variables of glsl_to_tgsi_instruction are already being
initialized from its implicitly defined constructor, it's not
necessary to use rzalloc to allocate its memory.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
All member variables of ir_to_mesa_instruction are already being
initialized from its implicitly defined constructor, it's not
necessary to use rzalloc to allocate its memory.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
All member variables of vec4_live_variables are already being
initialized from its constructor, it's not necessary to use rzalloc to
allocate its memory, and doing so makes it more likely that we will
start relying on the allocator to zero out all memory if the class is
ever extended with new member variables.
That's bad because it ties objects to some specific allocation scheme,
and gives unpredictable results when an object is created with a
different allocator -- Stack allocation, array allocation, or
aggregation inside a different object are some of the useful
possibilities that come to my mind.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
All member variables of fs_live_variables are already being
initialized from its constructor, it's not necessary to use rzalloc to
allocate its memory, and doing so makes it more likely that we will
start relying on the allocator to zero out all memory if the class is
ever extended with new member variables.
That's bad because it ties objects to some specific allocation scheme,
and gives unpredictable results when an object is created with a
different allocator -- Stack allocation, array allocation, or
aggregation inside a different object are some of the useful
possibilities that come to my mind.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
All member variables of fs_inst are already being initialized from its
constructor, it's not necessary to use rzalloc to allocate its memory,
and doing so makes it more likely that we will start relying on the
allocator to zero out all memory if the class is ever extended with
new member variables.
That's bad because it ties objects to some specific allocation scheme,
and gives unpredictable results when an object is created with a
different allocator -- Stack allocation, array allocation, or
aggregation inside a different object are some of the useful
possibilities that come to my mind.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
All member variables of ip_record are already being initialized from
its constructor, it's not necessary to use rzalloc to allocate its
memory, and doing so makes it more likely that we will start relying
on the allocator to zero out all memory if the class is ever extended
with new member variables.
That's bad because it ties objects to some specific allocation scheme,
and gives unpredictable results when an object is created with a
different allocator -- Stack allocation, array allocation, or
aggregation inside a different object are some of the useful
possibilities that come to my mind.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
The cfg_t object relies on the memory allocator zeroing out its
contents before it's initialized, which is quite an unusual practice
in the C++ world because it ties objects to some specific allocation
scheme, and gives unpredictable results when an object is created with
a different allocator -- Stack allocation, array allocation, or
aggregation inside a different object are some of the useful
possibilities that come to my mind. Initialize all fields from the
constructor and stop using the zeroing allocator.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
The bblock_t object relies on the memory allocator zeroing out its
contents before it's initialized, which is quite an unusual practice
in the C++ world because it ties objects to some specific allocation
scheme, and gives unpredictable results when an object is created with
a different allocator -- Stack allocation, array allocation, or
aggregation inside a different object are some of the useful
possibilities that come to my mind. Initialize all fields from the
constructor and stop using the zeroing allocator.
v2: Use zero initialization for numeric types instead of default construction.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
All member variables of ast_type_qualifier are already being
initialized from its implicitly defined constructor, it's not
necessary to use rzalloc to allocate its memory.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
All member variables of ast_node are already being initialized from
its constructor, but some of its derived classes were leaving members
uninitialized -- Fix them.
Using rzalloc makes it more likely that we will start relying on the
allocator to zero out all memory if the class is ever extended with
new member variables. That's bad because it ties objects to some
specific allocation scheme, and gives unpredictable results when an
object is created with a different allocator -- Stack allocation,
array allocation, or aggregation inside a different object are some of
the useful possibilities that come to my mind.
v2: Use NULL initialization instead of default construction for pointers.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
The vec4_instruction object relies on the memory allocator zeroing out
its contents before it's initialized, which is quite an unusual
practice in the C++ world because it ties objects to some specific
allocation scheme, and gives unpredictable results when an object is
created with a different allocator -- Stack allocation, array
allocation, or aggregation inside a different object are some of the
useful possibilities that come to my mind. Initialize all fields from
the constructor and stop using the zeroing allocator.
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <stereotype441@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <chad.versace@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
The _mesa_glsl_parse_state object relies on the memory allocator
zeroing out its contents before it's initialized, which is quite an
unusual practice in the C++ world because it ties objects to some
specific allocation scheme, and gives unpredictable results when an
object is created with a different allocator -- Stack allocation,
array allocation, or aggregation inside a different object are some of
the useful possibilities that come to my mind. Initialize all fields
from the constructor and stop using the zeroing allocator.
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <stereotype441@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <chad.versace@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Several C++ source files include "main/uniforms.h" from an extern "C"
block, which is both unnecessary, because "uniforms.h" already checks
for a C++ compiler and sets the right linkage, and incorrect, because
the header file includes other C++ headers ("glsl_types.h" and
"ir_uniform.h") that are supposed to get C++ linkage.
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <stereotype441@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <chad.versace@linux.intel.com>
In commit 247f90c77e (i965/gs: Set
control data header size/format appropriately for EndPrimitive()), I
incorrectly numbered the DWORDs in the 3DSTATE_GS command starting
from 1 instead of starting from 0. This caused the control data
format to be programmed into the wrong DWORD, resulting in corruption
in some geometry shaders that used an output type of points.
This patch numbers the DWORDs starting from 0, as we do for all other
commands, which causes the control data format to be programmed into
the correct DWORD.
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <chad.versace@linux.intel.com>
The spec doesn't say GL_INVALID_VALUE should be raised for bufSize <= 0.
In any case, memcpy(len < 0) will lead to a crash, so don't allow it.
CC: "9.2" <mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Error checking bufSize isn't mentioned in the spec, but it is in the
man pages. However, I believe the man page is incorrect. Typically,
GL functions that take GLsizei parameters check that they're positive
or non-negative. Negative values don't make sense here.
A spec bug has been filed with Khronos/ARB.
v2: check for negative values, not <= 0.
This incorporates Vinson's change to check for a null src pointer as
detected by coverity.
Also, rename the function params to be src/dst, const-qualify src,
and use GL types to match the calling functions. And add some more
comments.
Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri <t_arceri@yahoo.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Move glx/{,xlib/}Makefile.am to preserve file list
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
