New configuration API:
libinput_device_config_calibration_has_matrix()
libinput_device_config_calibration_set_matrix()
libinput_device_config_calibration_get_matrix()
libinput_device_config_calibration_get_default_matrix()
Deprecates libinput_device_calibrate().
For coordinate transformation, we're using a precalculated matrix. Thus, to
support ..._get_matrix() we need to store the original user-specified matrix
separately, in an unmangled state.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Basic tests for rotation, translation and scaling events.
Note that tests need to be added separately for single-touch and touch
devices, this is a restriction of the litest framework.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
WL_CALIBRATION is a weston-specific property that required the translation
component of the matrix to be in pixels. libinput can't provide calibration
based on unknown outputs, so drop support for this property.
The basic functionality is maintained, renaming just makes the change in
behavior more explicit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The big change here is the requirement to have the translation component in a
device-normalized coordinate space. Without that, we cannot reliably rotate as
the coordinate space is effectively unknown and may differ between the axes.
This affects any rotation matrix or translation matrix, pure scale matrices
were working just fine since they're unit-less.
Requiring the matrix in device-normalized space makes it possible for libinput
to rotate or otherwise handle the matrix independent of the screen resolution.
The rotation matrix is documented in a bit more detail to make it easier for
users to figure it out.
This changes the definition of the WL_CALIBRATION property (which is currently
broken).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
We apply calibration to single-touch and absolute devices, but we might as
well do so for multitouch events.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
With a non-zero absmin for both axes and different ranges for x/y, just to
detect those errors.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
litest_wait_for_event() returns if any event is available.
litest_wait_for_event_of_type(... type, type, type, -1) returns if any of the
given event types is availble. All other events are discarded.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
container_of() accesses tp for offset calculation. Which is fine, but
Coverity doesn't know that.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The current conditions result in _elem being assigned _arr[i] before the
condition is checked. This is fine since we then break from the loop and don't
access it anyway, but it makes Coverity unhappy.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Both motion and timeout expiry transition into the TOUCH_2_HOLD state, but
only for motion do we need to cancel the current timeout.
Found by Coverity.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Let the caller decide what to do with the fd.
In the current code the caller can't know if the fd was closed on error since
we return NULL on malloc failure as well as on epoll_ctl() failure. In the
latter case the fd was closed, not in the former. The caller had to close
the fd anyway (and all three callers do), so drop closing the fd from this
function.
Found by Coverity.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Our static library leaks symbols like crazy, some of which are likely
conflicts with users of this library (log_msg, open_restricted, ...).
Disale static linking by default so we don't have to spend time debugging
this.
Related to:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82292https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82785
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The goal of -static was to avoid the libtool wrappers for easier debugging.
The -no-install flag does exactly that, without requiring static linking.
Related to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82292
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
When removing a device, its not guaranteed that all button or key
presses have been released, resulting in an invalid seat wide button
count.
Note that kernel devices normally will send release events when being
unplugged, but this won't happen when removing a device from the path
backend.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Keep track of the number of times a given button or key is pressed on a
device. For regular mouse devices or keyboard devices, such a count will
never exceed 1, but counting button presses could help when button
presses with the same code can originate from different sources. One could
for example implement overlapping tap-drags with button presses by
having them deal with their own life-time independently, sorting out
when the user should receive button presses or not depending on the
pressed count.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The kernel may send a 'release' event without ever having sent a key
'pressed' event in case the key was pressed before libinput was
initiated. Ignore these events so that we always guarantee a release
event always comes after a pressed event for any given key or button.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
It's up to a evdev device backend to configure seat capabilities it
supports. Even though it may be possible for a touchpad to have extra
keys, there is currently no support for sending keyboard events from the
touchpad driver, and if that would be implemented, it'd be a detail of
the touchpad driver, not the generic evdev device part.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
When overriding events of a test device, if one would enable an event
that was already enabled by default for the overridden device, an assert
checking if the event was already enabled would fail and cause the test
to fail.
Since the merging of the default and overriding event lists is implemented
by simply concatinating them letting libevdev deal with ignoring
superfluous event enabling, remove the assert to allow the implementation
to work.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Some tests in test/path.c and test/udev.c are not dependent on
device behaviour but rather managing of device lifetime etc. Run those
tests only once with only one device, resulting more or less the same
code coverage but shorter run time.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We had reports that the top software button area is hard to hit for those
using the trackpoint and clicking the buttons with their thumb.
Analysis of event recordings (3 different people) for left, right and middle
clicks shows that there is a significant amount of events up to about 10mm
(with outliers up to 12mm) from the top of the touchpad. That maps to 15%.
Interestingly, the middle button is not affected by this, presumably the
haptic feedback of the little dots sticking out from the surface make hitting
the button easier.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Provides the bounding box only, with slot 0 always being the upper/left, slot
1 being the lower-right touch. This needs to use the touch_down etc. litest
interfaces, which are now widened to double (leftover from 489630f58) and a
device-specific private pointer in the litest device.
New device feature for litest: LITEST_SEMI_MT
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
On semi-mt touchpads the reported position of the first finger down may
jump when the pad switches from st to mt mode. When this happens a large
delta gets seen on the first finger at the same time the second fingers
is first seen down, causing a spurious 2 finger scroll event.
Reset the motion history when nfingers changes on semi-mt pads to avoid this.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Set BTN_TOUCH, BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP automatically depending on the number of
fingers down.
This emulates real event sequences a bit better than the current approach,
though it's not a 100% correct emulation:
1) On real devices, BTN_* are usually sent last before the SYN_REPORT - here
they are sent first to slot in with the custom, device-specific event
sequence. We should only ever look at the complete sequence anyway, so this
shouldn't matter.
2) On real devices, the switch from BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP to TRIPLETAP and vice
versa is not always toggled within the same SYN_REPORT
3) On synaptics devices, BTN_TOUCH is released in the frame where
BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP is set. It is then immediately set again in the next
frame. With the current litest framework this is hard to integrate, so we
just leave BTN_TOUCH set the whole time, which is what MT devices do if
they don't have BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Some tests doesn't use or doesn't need to use the test device
automatically created when adding a test case for certain types of
devices. For these tests, to shorten test run time, don't create the
test devices that would be ignored.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is a debugging tool, so the features to debug should be enabled by
default.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
More expressive in the caller and less ambiguous about return values (is it 1?
is it non-zero? can it be negative?)
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Force a cast of the input arguments to a double before the divide, rather
than after the divide.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Multi-touch pads may track less touches then they can report fingers being
present through BTN_TOOL_FOO. So create fake touches for fingers reported
by BTN_TOOL_FOO on multi-touch pads too (when necessary).
This fixes e.g. 3 finger tap not working on the T440s.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Don't process fake touches, e.g. re-adding the same position to the motion
history when they are not dirty. This could trigger for example on a button
press.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
They were already protected against being called twice between SYN_REPORT, but not
for being called twice before a SYN_REPORT arrives.
This allows simplifying tp_process_fake_touch a bit. Note while at it also
also flip the if condition in tp_process_fake_touch so that the if is
true when the finger is down, and remove the bogus t->state = TOUCH_NONE.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
They don't set resolution so we can't calculate the size but we know they're
big enough to need palm detection.
And fix the descriptor for the bcm5974. For some reason this was advertising
synaptics coordinates. Fix it to represent (one of) the apple touchpads.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Add the config status enum to the config doxygen group, and remove a
superfluous argument for an @ingroup command.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
On small touchpads, a touch that intends to go across the width of the
touchpad is likely to start in the edge zone. Likewise, on those touchpads the
chances of a palm event happening on the edge is small.
A minimum width of 8cm determined by an elaborate process of completely
unscientific guesswork: the x220 is roughly 7.5cm across and doesn't suffer
much from edge events, the T440s is 10cm across and definitely suffers from
it. So the trigger width likely somewhere in between which makes 8cm about as
valid as any other guess.
Note that this disables palm detection for resolution-less touchpads too - if
we don't know how big the touchpad is we can't know if palm detection on the
edges is necessary.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Any legitimate finger movement that starts in the palm area is expected to
move out of the palm area at an angle roughly orthogonal to the edge of the
touchpad. Check for the direction of the movement vector, and if it is within
the accepted cardinal/ordinal directions then proceed.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
On small touchpads a touch that is intended to traverse much of the screen
width may start at the very edge, i.e. in the palm zone.
In that case, and if the touch moves out of the palm zone quickly enough, drop
the palm label and make it a normal touchpoint.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
A large part of palm events are situated on the far edges of the touchpad. In
a test run on a T440s while typing a long email all but 2 touch points were
located in the outer ~5% of the touchpad. Define a 5% exclusion zone on the
left and right edges in which new touchpoint is automatically assigned to be a
palm.
A finger may move into that exclusion zone without being marked as palm, it
just can't start in one.
On clickpads, the exclusion zone does not extend into the software buttons.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
