For each device open the various led devices (brightness only) and map the one
nonzero brightness to the current mode.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 5eb71b65e4)
Loop immediately exited, this code was never triggered.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 4d20130e05)
When the filter code switched to raw device coordinates (bdd4264d) the input
data remained in device coordinates. Since the factor for touchpads was still
based on the physical velocity (and thus all touchpads get the same
acceleration factor for identical moves), the actual delta was dependent on
the resolution. e.g.
touchpad with 40u/mm: delta of 2/2 * accel factor 2 -> accel delta of 4/4
touchpad with 20u/mm: delta of 1/1 * accel factor 2 -> accel delta of 2/2
The normalized coordinates should be independent of the touchpad's resolution
though.
Affected by this was the standard mouse accel code and the touchpad accel
code, other filters always returned unnormalized coordinates (separate bug,
not addressed here).
This patch restores the correct behaviour for mice and touchpads
while leaving the special filters untouched. For comparision:
* 1000+dpi mice: accelerate normalized, return normalized
* touchpads: accelerate unnormalized, return normalized
* low-dpi mice: accelerate unnormalized, return unnormalized
* trackpoints: accelerate unnormalized, return unnormalized
* x230: don't touch, already does the right thing
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99383
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
We were just switching type here without actual normalization, the filter code
is in device units as of bdd4264d61.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
From systemd commit f644a6da7a: "pyparsing 2.1.10 fixed the handling of
LineStart to really just apply to line starts and not ignore whitespace and
comments any more. Adjust EMPTYLINE to this."
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
I'm using semaphore CI for build testing and that only provides Ubuntu 14.04
which doesn't have libevdev 1.3 or later.
Since this is a minor workaround for an error case only, revert the commit
again and leave the handling in. Less effort than having to patch around it in
semaphore.
This reverts commit 1e0736daf3.
gcov analysis showed that none of the actual testing conditions were hit, so
the test succeeded despite not actually testing anything. Which is good,
because testing for tilt normalization isn't correct anyway, tilt is in
physical degrees,
Drop the test and replace it with a test for pressure normalization instead.
We already have a similar one to check for [0, 1] range, this new one
explicitly tests for the extents.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
They weren't originally prefixed but the various tests were, but now that we
only have one test runner binary anyway, the prefix helps sorting the files
easily within e.g. gcov results.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Use the litest_assert_empty_queue() instead of manual checking, and remove the
manual checks after the function call.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
These were just there so we didn't have an unused variable warning, but
there's no reason even assigning to anything in the first place
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We used to mark dell touchpads this way but let's make this more generic.
Nothing else used the dell touchpad model flag, so we can simply replace it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Only allow values of 0 and 1 for udev flags. Not that I'm aware of anyone
using anything else (i.e. his shouldn't break anything) but it's best to be as
restrictive as possible here.
Bonus effect: it's now possible to unset LIBINPUT_MODEL_* tags as well,
previously any value (including 0) was counted as "yes".
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
If the fingers rest on the touchpad without moving for a timeout, switch to
pinch or swipe based on the finger position. We already switched to two-finger
scrolling based on the timeout, now we also do so for 3 and 4 finger gestures.
This gives us better reaction to small movements.
This also fixes previously unreachable code: the test for the finger position
required at least 3 fingers down but was within a condition that ensured only
2 fingers were down. This was introduced in 11917061fe.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
When a finger moves less than the movement threshold, motion is filtered until
the timeout is hit. If the threshold is too high the responsiveness of the
pointer suffers.
Event analysis from several users showed that 95% of the touches move less
than 1.3mm long. Reducing the threshold should have almost no impact on most
tapping users but improves the reaction time of the pointer for normal
movements.
For a more details see:
http://who-t.blogspot.com/2016/12/libinput-touchpad-tap-analysis.html
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
This is the timeout before we decide "this is just a finger down, not a tap".
Until this timeout is hit a finger's movement is filtered. To allow for a more
responsive touchpad, we want that timeout as short as possible.
Event analysis from several users showed that 95% of the touches are less than
100ms long. Reducing the threshold should have almost no impact on most
tapping users but improves the reaction time of the pointer for normal
movements.
For a more details see:
http://who-t.blogspot.com/2016/12/libinput-touchpad-tap-analysis.html
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Could be confirmation bias, but it feels better.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The previous code had three main issues:
* acceleration kicked in too early, so even slow movements were accelerated
* acceleration kicked in too quickly, there was only a very narrow window
where we would have less than the max acceleration factor
* the max accel factor was too low for fast movements, so they still fell
short of expectations
This patch revamps most of the acceleration though it keeps the basic shape of
the acceleration curve.
* The threshold is increased significantly so that faster movement
still map to the finger movement. Acceleration doesn't kick in until we get
to something that's really fast like a flick.
* The incline is dropped, so acceleration kicks in slower than before, i.e.
the difference between the first speed that is accelerated and the speed
that reaches the maximum is higher than before.
* The maximum acceleration is increased so ever faster movements get ever
faster. The max is effectively out of reach now, if you move fast enough to
hit this speed, your cursor will end up on the moon anyway.
A couple of other changes apply now too, specifically:
* The incline remains the same regardless of the speed
* The max accel factor remains the same regardless of the speed
The caculated factor changes with the speed set so that the base speed changes
with the desired speed.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
We have everything separate from the mouse now, so having a magic slowdown
isn't needed, we can work this into our parameters. So the acceleration
function now uses everything adjusted, but the factor is still multiplied by
the slowdown in the end.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
That's something human brains can map to because mapping a touchpad to
equivalent units of a 1000dpi mouse requires a lot of mental acrobatics. And
I'm getting older and my physio told me acrobatics is more something for the
youngens, possibly those on my lawn listening to terrible music, etc.
The various numbers are converted either times 25.4/1000 or times 1000/25.4,
depending on the usage. Somewhere I made a mistake or a rounding error or
something, so the acceleration curve is not exactly the same, but it's close
enough that it shouldn't matter. The difference shows up in a gnuplot of the
curve but it may not even perceivable anyway. And these values will be
overhauled soon anyway, so meh.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The profile is what is still special about those two, the filter itself does
the same as the default filter (calculate velocity, calculate accel factor,
apply to delta).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
