Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
The System76 Galago Ultra Pro is a rebranded Clevo W740SU with changed
firmware strings. To my knowledge, the Clevo W740SU and all its rebrands
possess smooth touchpads.
In the original bug report[1], a Galago Ultra Pro was returned to the
original DMI strings by flashing another firmware. This resulted in the
model identified as MODEL_SYSTEM76_CLEVO.
Since the actual manufacturer of the W740SU is Clevo and the CLEVO hwdb
entry already properly identifies other W740SU rebrands like the Schenker
S413, the model should be renamed to match.
[1]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90170#c3https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90353
Signed-off-by: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) <jan.steffens@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Bonobo, Clevo, Galago and Kudu have clickpads and no markings ->
enable clickfinger by default.
Lemur and Gazelle have physical buttons, no need for extra configuration.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90170
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
This matches the vendor default.
Board IDs pulled from modinfo chromeos_laptop, touchpad names from a bit of
googling around.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Tested-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
On the Logitech T650 it's quite easy to trigger a click without touching the
surface. For software buttons we discard those clicks because we can't tell
where the finger is to decide on left vs right click.
It takes effort to trigger a click with two fingers without triggering a touch
though, so in clickfinger mode post a click without touches as single-finger
click.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90150
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Split into button and area, the latter of which is the bitmask of which area
we're in. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If the touchpad has left/right physical buttons but no middle button, force
middle button emulation - without a config option, it's always on.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
No functional changes at this point, this merely splits up any physical
buttons (i.e. that represent buttons that exist on that device) vs. other
buttons that are emulated in some way or another.
This is in preparation for the addition of middle button emulation.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Clickpads have BTN_LEFT but no BTN_RIGHT, non-clickpads must have both.
Tablet touch devices don't have any buttons, so skip the warning for those.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Handle everything which is not handled by the tap, (soft)button or edge-scroll
code/statemachines in a unified way. Everything is treated as a X-finger
gesture now, and the action to take on finger movement is decided by
the gesture.finger_count setting. Pointer control now simply is seen as a
1 finger gesture, and 2fg scrolling as a 2fg gesture.
This removed the need for special-casing things like switching back to
pointer mode when lifting a finger in 2fg scrolling mode, and also lays the
groundwork for adding 3+ fg gesture support.
Note that 1 test-case needs to be updated to wait for the finger mode
switching when switching mode while a gesture has already been started.
This is actually an improvement as this stops sending spurious pointer
motion events at the end of 2fg scrolling when not lifting both fingers at
exactly the same time.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Coverity pointed these out, they're false positives but mark them with
comments to make it obvious to the reader.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Allow switching between softbuttons and clickfinger on any mt-capable
clickpad.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
[hdegoede@redhat.com] Keep top softbuttons working when enabling clickfinger
[hdegoede@redhat.com] Simply touchpad click method switching
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
We use 2 mechanisms to unregister the trackpoint event listener depending on
device removal order.
1) We have a device_removed callback, if the trackpoint gets removed before
the touchpad, this gets called, sees the device being removed is the trackpoint
and unregisters the listener
2) If the touchpad gets removed first, then in tp_destroy we unregister the
listener
2) May be delayed beyond the destruction of the trackpoint itself if the
libinput user has a reference to the libinput_device for the touchpad.
When this happens the trackpoint still has an eventlistener at destroy time
and an assert triggers.
To fix this we must do 2) at the same time as we do 1), so at remove time.
While working on this I noticed that the touchpad code was also cancelling
timers at destroy time rather then remove time, which means that they may
expire between remove and destroy time, and cause events to be emitted from
a removed device, so this commit moves the cancelling of the timers to the
remove callback as well.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Tapping and clickfinger is unaffected, physical and software buttons are
swapped. The main area of a clickpad remains as left button though.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Make it easier to hit the topbutton area when the touchpad is disabled,
normally we don't want to make the topbutton area too big, so as to not
interfere with normal touchpad operation, but when disabled we have no such
worries.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
On a TOPBUTTONPAD, we can't disable the touchpad altogether - the trackstick
relies on the touchpad's top software buttons.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The touchpad top softbuttons such as found on the Lenove T440 are intended for
use with the trackstick. Route their events through the trackstick, so that
they can be used for e.g. middle button scrolling with the trackstick.
Note that sending top button events to a disabled trackpoint makes no sense
(and will mess up internal state). Likely a user with a disabled trackpoint
will still expect the top buttons to work, so rather than not sending events
in that case, simply treat a suspendeded trackpoint as not being there, and
send the events directly from the touchpad device.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We may be in the middle of a software button click or a tap, so make sure we
go back to the device-neutral state by unwinding.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Keep track of the number of times a given button or key is pressed on a
device. For regular mouse devices or keyboard devices, such a count will
never exceed 1, but counting button presses could help when button
presses with the same code can originate from different sources. One could
for example implement overlapping tap-drags with button presses by
having them deal with their own life-time independently, sorting out
when the user should receive button presses or not depending on the
pressed count.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We had reports that the top software button area is hard to hit for those
using the trackpoint and clicking the buttons with their thumb.
Analysis of event recordings (3 different people) for left, right and middle
clicks shows that there is a significant amount of events up to about 10mm
(with outliers up to 12mm) from the top of the touchpad. That maps to 15%.
Interestingly, the middle button is not affected by this, presumably the
haptic feedback of the little dots sticking out from the surface make hitting
the button easier.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
They don't set resolution so we can't calculate the size but we know they're
big enough to need palm detection.
And fix the descriptor for the bcm5974. For some reason this was advertising
synaptics coordinates. Fix it to represent (one of) the apple touchpads.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
A large part of palm events are situated on the far edges of the touchpad. In
a test run on a T440s while typing a long email all but 2 touch points were
located in the outer ~5% of the touchpad. Define a 5% exclusion zone on the
left and right edges in which new touchpoint is automatically assigned to be a
palm.
A finger may move into that exclusion zone without being marked as palm, it
just can't start in one.
On clickpads, the exclusion zone does not extend into the software buttons.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The original intention of this state was to prevent an accidental move out of
the bottom software button to start moving the cursor. That ends up actually
preventing a number of normal moves that start low enough. Simply drop the
state.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The current 20% is excessive. On the t440s, the button size amounts to ~14mm
from the bottom. On the x220 it amounts to ~9mm, leaving only 31mm as actual
touchpad.
Reduce it to 15% instead, which amounts to 10.5mm on the t440 and 6mm on the
x220. Cap the button height further by making buttons a maximum height of
10mm, anything larger than that is excessive anyway.
Smaller buttons should be acceptable since we can rely on the bottom edge to
be a haptic feedback and thus a good hit-target, somewhat simliar to how
screen edges are good hit-targets.
The top software buttons stay the same size, but prefer a physical size of 6mm
instead (which is 1mm below the button marker line on the T440s). If no y
resolution is available, fall back to the 8% which is 5.6mm on the T440s.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Rather than a single global logging function, make the logging dependent on
the individual context. This way we won't stomp on each other's feet in the
(admittedly unusual) case of having multiple libinput contexts.
The userdata argument to the log handler was dropped. The caller has a ref to
the libinput context now, any userdata can be attached to that context
instead.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Besides being a nice cleanup, this gives us proper per touch timeouts.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Button states are applicable to more then just the pointer, so having a
non-generic name name for a generic enumerator value like
libinput_pointer_button_state doesn't make sense. Changing it to something
generic like libinput_button_state allows it to be reused by other devices that
may potentially be added to libinput in the future.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Chandler Paul <thatslyude@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Avoids having to #define any values we're trying to use.
Header file is from Linux 3.15-rc8.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Add support for the top softbutton area found on some laptops.
For details of how this works, see the updated
doc/touchpad-softbutton-state-machine.svg diagram.
Basically this mirrors the state-machine for the bottom softbutton area, with
one exception, if a finger stays at least inner timeout milliseconds in the
top button area and then moves out of it, it will be ignored rather then
become the pointer. This is done so that people using the top buttons together
with a trackstick and accidentally move their finger out of the upper area
don't get spurious pointer movements from the finger on the trackpad.
This behavior is indentical to xf86-input-synaptics, which also ignores
movements from touches which start in the top button area.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Rename some clickpad softbutton area variables to have bottom in their
name, this is a preperation patch for adding top softbutton area support.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
When we knowingly hit a bug, we should know what the bug is caused by. Log
that in a standardized fashion.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
We store timestamps in ms since system boot (CLOCK_MONOTONIC). This will wrap
after circa 50 days.
I've considered making our code wrapping safe, but that won't work. We also
use our internal timestamps to program timer-fds for timeouts. And we store
ms in a single integer but the kernel uses 2 integers, one for seconds and
one for usec/nanosec. So at 32 bits our ms containing integer will wrap
in 50 days, while the kernels seconds storing integer lasts a lot longer.
So when we wrap our ms timestamps, we will be programming the timer-fds
with a seconds value in the past.
So change all our internal timestamps to uint64_t to avoid the wrapping
when programming the timer-fds. Note that we move from 64-bit timestamps to
32-bit timestamps when calling the foo_notify_bar functions from
libinput-private.h. Having 64 bit timestamps has no use past this point,
since the wayland input protocol uses 32 bit timestamps (and clients will
have to deal with wrapping).
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We already check for old != current everywhere, so this is not needed;
And in tp_post_softbutton_buttons we want to do delay button down reporting if
we don't have touch info yet in which case this check actually gets in the way.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We should never get any non left button events on clickpads, but if we
do these might confuse our state, so complain about it and ignore these.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
And warn if INPUT_PROP_BUTTONPAD mismatches right/middle buttons presence.
Also fix the bcm5974 to properly advertise INPUT_PROP_BUTTONPAD.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We don't want touches in the button area to cause the pointer to move. So
instead of making a touch the pointer when it moves to TOUCH_BEGIN, wait
with making it the pointer until its buttons state moves to BUTTON_STATE_AREA.
Note that a touch in the main area of the touchpad will move to
BUTTON_STATE_AREA immediately. If software-buttons are not enabled, any finger
is in the BUTTON_STATE_AREA.
While at it also refactor the is_pointer setting in general, removing
code duplicition wrt checking that another touch is not already
the pointer on unpinning a finger, and add safeguards that unpinning
does not make a finger which is not in button state BUTTON_STATE_AREA the
pointer, nor that the button code makes a pinned finger the pointer.
All these sanity checks are combined into a new tp_button_active function,
since they should be taken into account for 2 finger scrolling, etc. too.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Almost all non Apple touchpads have visible markings for software button areas,
so limit clickfinger behavior to Apple clickpads, and implement software button
areas for others.
This is a slightly fancier implementation than the simplest model and ported
over from libtouchpad. It implements a state machine for the software buttons
with left and right buttons currently implemented. Buttons are oriented
left-to-right, in a horizontal bar. No random button placement allowed.
In general, the procedure is:
- if a finger sets down in the left button area, a click is a left click
- if a finger sets down in the right button area, a click is a right click
- if a finger leaves the button area, a click is a left click
- if a finger starts outside the button area, a click is a left click
Two timeouts are used to handle buttons more smoothly:
- if a finger sets down in a button area but "immediately" moves over
to a different area, that area takes effect on a click.
- if a finger leaves a button area and "immediately" clicks or moves back into
the area, the button still takes effect on a click.
- if a finger changes between areas and stays there for a timeout, that area
takes effect on a click.
Note the button area states are named BOTTOM_foo to make it easier to later
add support for a top button area such as can be found on the Thinkpad [2-5]40
series.
Co-authored-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
To avoid having a button left press and a button right release if the number
of fingers changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
