mirror of
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa.git
synced 2026-05-19 02:48:07 +02:00
The algorithm is as described. Nothing fancy here, just need to add some new code paths depending on which model we're running on. Tomeu: - Also disable tiling when !hierarchy and !vertex_count - Avoid creating polygon lists smaller than the minimum when vertex_count > 0 but tile size smaller than 16 byte - Take into account tile size when calculating polygon list size for !hierarchy - Allow 0-sized tiles in a single dimension Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
373 lines
16 KiB
C
373 lines
16 KiB
C
/*
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2019 Collabora, Ltd.
|
|
*
|
|
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
|
|
* copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
|
|
* to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
|
|
* the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
|
|
* and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
|
|
* Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
|
|
*
|
|
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
|
|
* paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
|
|
* Software.
|
|
*
|
|
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
|
|
* IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
|
|
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
|
|
* THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
|
|
* LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
|
|
* OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
|
|
* SOFTWARE.
|
|
*
|
|
* Authors:
|
|
* Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include "util/u_math.h"
|
|
#include "util/macros.h"
|
|
#include "pan_encoder.h"
|
|
|
|
/* Mali GPUs are tiled-mode renderers, rather than immediate-mode.
|
|
* Conceptually, the screen is divided into 16x16 tiles. Vertex shaders run.
|
|
* Then, a fixed-function hardware block (the tiler) consumes the gl_Position
|
|
* results. For each triangle specified, it marks each containing tile as
|
|
* containing that triangle. This set of "triangles per tile" form the "polygon
|
|
* list". Finally, the rasterization unit consumes the polygon list to invoke
|
|
* the fragment shader.
|
|
*
|
|
* In practice, it's a bit more complicated than this. On Midgard chips with an
|
|
* "advanced tiling unit" (all except T720/T820/T830), 16x16 is the logical
|
|
* tile size, but Midgard features "hierarchical tiling", where power-of-two
|
|
* multiples of the base tile size can be used: hierarchy level 0 (16x16),
|
|
* level 1 (32x32), level 2 (64x64), per public information about Midgard's
|
|
* tiling. In fact, tiling goes up to 4096x4096 (!), although in practice
|
|
* 128x128 is the largest usually used (though higher modes are enabled). The
|
|
* idea behind hierarchical tiling is to use low tiling levels for small
|
|
* triangles and high levels for large triangles, to minimize memory bandwidth
|
|
* and repeated fragment shader invocations (the former issue inherent to
|
|
* immediate-mode rendering and the latter common in traditional tilers).
|
|
*
|
|
* The tiler itself works by reading varyings in and writing a polygon list
|
|
* out. Unfortunately (for us), both of these buffers are managed in main
|
|
* memory; although they ideally will be cached, it is the drivers'
|
|
* responsibility to allocate these buffers. Varying buffer allocation is
|
|
* handled elsewhere, as it is not tiler specific; the real issue is allocating
|
|
* the polygon list.
|
|
*
|
|
* This is hard, because from the driver's perspective, we have no information
|
|
* about what geometry will actually look like on screen; that information is
|
|
* only gained from running the vertex shader. (Theoretically, we could run the
|
|
* vertex shaders in software as a prepass, or in hardware with transform
|
|
* feedback as a prepass, but either idea is ludicrous on so many levels).
|
|
*
|
|
* Instead, Mali uses a bit of a hybrid approach, splitting the polygon list
|
|
* into three distinct pieces. First, the driver statically determines which
|
|
* tile hierarchy levels to use (more on that later). At this point, we know the
|
|
* framebuffer dimensions and all the possible tilings of the framebuffer, so
|
|
* we know exactly how many tiles exist across all hierarchy levels. The first
|
|
* piece of the polygon list is the header, which is exactly 8 bytes per tile,
|
|
* plus padding and a small 64-byte prologue. (If that doesn't remind you of
|
|
* AFBC, it should. See pan_afbc.c for some fun parallels). The next part is
|
|
* the polygon list body, which seems to contain 512 bytes per tile, again
|
|
* across every level of the hierarchy. These two parts form the polygon list
|
|
* buffer. This buffer has a statically determinable size, approximately equal
|
|
* to the # of tiles across all hierarchy levels * (8 bytes + 512 bytes), plus
|
|
* alignment / minimum restrictions / etc.
|
|
*
|
|
* The third piece is the easy one (for us): the tiler heap. In essence, the
|
|
* tiler heap is a gigantic slab that's as big as could possibly be necessary
|
|
* in the worst case imaginable. Just... a gigantic allocation that we give a
|
|
* start and end pointer to. What's the catch? The tiler heap is lazily
|
|
* allocated; that is, a huge amount of memory is _reserved_, but only a tiny
|
|
* bit is actually allocated upfront. The GPU just keeps using the
|
|
* unallocated-but-reserved portions as it goes along, generating page faults
|
|
* if it goes beyond the allocation, and then the kernel is instructed to
|
|
* expand the allocation on page fault (known in the vendor kernel as growable
|
|
* memory). This is quite a bit of bookkeeping of its own, but that task is
|
|
* pushed to kernel space and we can mostly ignore it here, just remembering to
|
|
* set the GROWABLE flag so the kernel actually uses this path rather than
|
|
* allocating a gigantic amount up front and burning a hole in RAM.
|
|
*
|
|
* As far as determining which hierarchy levels to use, the simple answer is
|
|
* that right now, we don't. In the tiler configuration fields (consistent from
|
|
* the earliest Midgard's SFBD through the latest Bifrost traces we have),
|
|
* there is a hierarchy_mask field, controlling which levels (tile sizes) are
|
|
* enabled. Ideally, the hierarchical tiling dream -- mapping big polygons to
|
|
* big tiles and small polygons to small tiles -- would be realized here as
|
|
* well. As long as there are polygons at all needing tiling, we always have to
|
|
* have big tiles available, in case there are big polygons. But we don't
|
|
* necessarily need small tiles available. Ideally, when there are small
|
|
* polygons, small tiles are enabled (to avoid waste from putting small
|
|
* triangles in the big tiles); when there are not, small tiles are disabled to
|
|
* avoid enabling more levels than necessary, which potentially costs in memory
|
|
* bandwidth / power / tiler performance.
|
|
*
|
|
* Of course, the driver has to figure this out statically. When tile
|
|
* hiearchies are actually established, this occurs by the tiler in
|
|
* fixed-function hardware, after the vertex shaders have run and there is
|
|
* sufficient information to figure out the size of triangles. The driver has
|
|
* no such luxury, again barring insane hacks like additionally running the
|
|
* vertex shaders in software or in hardware via transform feedback. Thus, for
|
|
* the driver, we need a heuristic approach.
|
|
*
|
|
* There are lots of heuristics to guess triangle size statically you could
|
|
* imagine, but one approach shines as particularly simple-stupid: assume all
|
|
* on-screen triangles are equal size and spread equidistantly throughout the
|
|
* screen. Let's be clear, this is NOT A VALID ASSUMPTION. But if we roll with
|
|
* it, then we see:
|
|
*
|
|
* Triangle Area = (Screen Area / # of triangles)
|
|
* = (Width * Height) / (# of triangles)
|
|
*
|
|
* Or if you prefer, we can also make a third CRAZY assumption that we only draw
|
|
* right triangles with edges parallel/perpendicular to the sides of the screen
|
|
* with no overdraw, forming a triangle grid across the screen:
|
|
*
|
|
* |--w--|
|
|
* _____ |
|
|
* | /| /| |
|
|
* |/_|/_| h
|
|
* | /| /| |
|
|
* |/_|/_| |
|
|
*
|
|
* Then you can use some middle school geometry and algebra to work out the
|
|
* triangle dimensions. I started working on this, but realised I didn't need
|
|
* to to make my point, but couldn't bare to erase that ASCII art. Anyway.
|
|
*
|
|
* POINT IS, by considering the ratio of screen area and triangle count, we can
|
|
* estimate the triangle size. For a small size, use small bins; for a large
|
|
* size, use large bins. Intuitively, this metric makes sense: when there are
|
|
* few triangles on a large screen, you're probably compositing a UI and
|
|
* therefore the triangles are large; when there are a lot of triangles on a
|
|
* small screen, you're probably rendering a 3D mesh and therefore the
|
|
* triangles are tiny. (Or better said -- there will be tiny triangles, even if
|
|
* there are also large triangles. There have to be unless you expect crazy
|
|
* overdraw. Generally, it's better to allow more small bin sizes than
|
|
* necessary than not allow enough.)
|
|
*
|
|
* From this heuristic (or whatever), we determine the minimum allowable tile
|
|
* size, and we use that to decide the hierarchy masking, selecting from the
|
|
* minimum "ideal" tile size to the maximum tile size (2048x2048 in practice).
|
|
*
|
|
* Once we have that mask and the framebuffer dimensions, we can compute the
|
|
* size of the statically-sized polygon list structures, allocate them, and go!
|
|
*
|
|
* -----
|
|
*
|
|
* On T720, T820, and T830, there is no support for hierarchical tiling.
|
|
* Instead, the hardware allows the driver to select the tile size dynamically
|
|
* on a per-framebuffer basis, including allowing rectangular/non-square tiles.
|
|
* Rules for tile size selection are as follows:
|
|
*
|
|
* - Dimensions must be powers-of-two.
|
|
* - The smallest tile is 16x16.
|
|
* - The tile width/height is at most the framebuffer w/h (clamp up to 16 pix)
|
|
* - There must be no more than 64 tiles in either dimension.
|
|
*
|
|
* Within these constraints, the driver is free to pick a tile size according
|
|
* to some heuristic, similar to units with an advanced tiling unit.
|
|
*
|
|
* To pick a size without any heuristics, we may satisfy the constraints by
|
|
* defaulting to 16x16 (a power-of-two). This fits the minimum. For the size
|
|
* constraint, consider:
|
|
*
|
|
* # of tiles < 64
|
|
* ceil (fb / tile) < 64
|
|
* (fb / tile) <= (64 - 1)
|
|
* tile <= fb / (64 - 1) <= next_power_of_two(fb / (64 - 1))
|
|
*
|
|
* Hence we clamp up to align_pot(fb / (64 - 1)).
|
|
|
|
* Extending to use a selection heuristic left for future work.
|
|
*
|
|
* Once the tile size (w, h) is chosen, we compute the hierarchy "mask":
|
|
*
|
|
* hierarchy_mask = (log2(h / 16) << 6) | log2(w / 16)
|
|
*
|
|
* Of course with no hierarchical tiling, this is not a mask; it's just a field
|
|
* specifying the tile size. But I digress.
|
|
*
|
|
* We also compute the polgon list sizes (with framebuffer size W, H) as:
|
|
*
|
|
* full_size = 0x200 + 0x200 * ceil(W / w) * ceil(H / h)
|
|
* offset = 8 * ceil(W / w) * ceil(H / h)
|
|
*
|
|
* It further appears necessary to round down offset to the nearest 0x200.
|
|
* Possibly we would also round down full_size to the nearest 0x200 but
|
|
* full_size/0x200 = (1 + ceil(W / w) * ceil(H / h)) is an integer so there's
|
|
* nothing to do.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/* Hierarchical tiling spans from 16x16 to 4096x4096 tiles */
|
|
|
|
#define MIN_TILE_SIZE 16
|
|
#define MAX_TILE_SIZE 4096
|
|
|
|
/* Constants as shifts for easier power-of-two iteration */
|
|
|
|
#define MIN_TILE_SHIFT util_logbase2(MIN_TILE_SIZE)
|
|
#define MAX_TILE_SHIFT util_logbase2(MAX_TILE_SIZE)
|
|
|
|
/* The hierarchy has a 64-byte prologue */
|
|
#define PROLOGUE_SIZE 0x40
|
|
|
|
/* For each tile (across all hierarchy levels), there is 8 bytes of header */
|
|
#define HEADER_BYTES_PER_TILE 0x8
|
|
|
|
/* Likewise, each tile per level has 512 bytes of body */
|
|
#define FULL_BYTES_PER_TILE 0x200
|
|
|
|
/* If the width-x-height framebuffer is divided into tile_size-x-tile_size
|
|
* tiles, how many tiles are there? Rounding up in each direction. For the
|
|
* special case of tile_size=16, this aligns with the usual Midgard count.
|
|
* tile_size must be a power-of-two. Not really repeat code from AFBC/checksum,
|
|
* because those care about the stride (not just the overall count) and only at
|
|
* a a fixed-tile size (not any of a number of power-of-twos) */
|
|
|
|
static unsigned
|
|
pan_tile_count(unsigned width, unsigned height, unsigned tile_width, unsigned tile_height)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned aligned_width = ALIGN_POT(width, tile_width);
|
|
unsigned aligned_height = ALIGN_POT(height, tile_height);
|
|
|
|
unsigned tile_count_x = aligned_width / tile_width;
|
|
unsigned tile_count_y = aligned_height / tile_height;
|
|
|
|
return tile_count_x * tile_count_y;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* For `masked_count` of the smallest tile sizes masked out, computes how the
|
|
* size of the polygon list header. We iterate the tile sizes (16x16 through
|
|
* 2048x2048). For each tile size, we figure out how many tiles there are at
|
|
* this hierarchy level and therefore many bytes this level is, leaving us with
|
|
* a byte count for each level. We then just sum up the byte counts across the
|
|
* levels to find a byte count for all levels. */
|
|
|
|
static unsigned
|
|
panfrost_hierarchy_size(
|
|
unsigned width,
|
|
unsigned height,
|
|
unsigned mask,
|
|
unsigned bytes_per_tile)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned size = PROLOGUE_SIZE;
|
|
|
|
/* Iterate hierarchy levels */
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned b = 0; b < (MAX_TILE_SHIFT - MIN_TILE_SHIFT); ++b) {
|
|
/* Check if this level is enabled */
|
|
if (!(mask & (1 << b)))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
/* Shift from a level to a tile size */
|
|
unsigned tile_size = (1 << b) * MIN_TILE_SIZE;
|
|
|
|
unsigned tile_count = pan_tile_count(width, height, tile_size, tile_size);
|
|
unsigned level_count = bytes_per_tile * tile_count;
|
|
|
|
size += level_count;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* This size will be used as an offset, so ensure it's aligned */
|
|
return ALIGN_POT(size, 0x200);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Implement the formula:
|
|
*
|
|
* 0x200 + bytes_per_tile * ceil(W / w) * ceil(H / h)
|
|
*
|
|
* rounding down the answer to the nearest 0x200. This is used to compute both
|
|
* header and body sizes for GPUs without hierarchical tiling. Essentially,
|
|
* computing a single hierarchy level, since there isn't any hierarchy!
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static unsigned
|
|
panfrost_flat_size(unsigned width, unsigned height, unsigned dim, unsigned bytes_per_tile)
|
|
{
|
|
/* First, extract the tile dimensions */
|
|
|
|
unsigned tw = (1 << (dim & 0b111)) * 8;
|
|
unsigned th = (1 << ((dim & (0b111 << 6)) >> 6)) * 8;
|
|
|
|
/* tile_count is ceil(W/w) * ceil(H/h) */
|
|
unsigned raw = pan_tile_count(width, height, tw, th) * bytes_per_tile;
|
|
|
|
/* Round down and add offset */
|
|
return 0x200 + ((raw / 0x200) * 0x200);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Given a hierarchy mask and a framebuffer size, compute the header size */
|
|
|
|
unsigned
|
|
panfrost_tiler_header_size(unsigned width, unsigned height, unsigned mask, bool hierarchy)
|
|
{
|
|
if (hierarchy)
|
|
return panfrost_hierarchy_size(width, height, mask, HEADER_BYTES_PER_TILE);
|
|
else
|
|
return panfrost_flat_size(width, height, mask, HEADER_BYTES_PER_TILE);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* The combined header/body is sized similarly (but it is significantly
|
|
* larger), except that it can be empty when the tiler disabled, rather than
|
|
* getting clamped to a minimum size.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
unsigned
|
|
panfrost_tiler_full_size(unsigned width, unsigned height, unsigned mask, bool hierarchy)
|
|
{
|
|
if (hierarchy)
|
|
return panfrost_hierarchy_size(width, height, mask, FULL_BYTES_PER_TILE);
|
|
else
|
|
return panfrost_flat_size(width, height, mask, FULL_BYTES_PER_TILE);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* On GPUs without hierarchical tiling, we choose a tile size directly and
|
|
* stuff it into the field otherwise known as hierarchy mask (not a mask). */
|
|
|
|
static unsigned
|
|
panfrost_choose_tile_size(
|
|
unsigned width, unsigned height, unsigned vertex_count)
|
|
{
|
|
/* Figure out the ideal tile size. Eventually a heuristic should be
|
|
* used for this */
|
|
|
|
unsigned best_w = 16;
|
|
unsigned best_h = 16;
|
|
|
|
/* Clamp so there are less than 64 tiles in each direction */
|
|
|
|
best_w = MAX2(best_w, util_next_power_of_two(width / 63));
|
|
best_h = MAX2(best_h, util_next_power_of_two(height / 63));
|
|
|
|
/* We have our ideal tile size, so encode */
|
|
|
|
unsigned exp_w = util_logbase2(best_w / 16);
|
|
unsigned exp_h = util_logbase2(best_h / 16);
|
|
|
|
return exp_w | (exp_h << 6);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* In the future, a heuristic to choose a tiler hierarchy mask would go here.
|
|
* At the moment, we just default to 0xFF, which enables all possible hierarchy
|
|
* levels. Overall this yields good performance but presumably incurs a cost in
|
|
* memory bandwidth / power consumption / etc, at least on smaller scenes that
|
|
* don't really need all the smaller levels enabled */
|
|
|
|
unsigned
|
|
panfrost_choose_hierarchy_mask(
|
|
unsigned width, unsigned height,
|
|
unsigned vertex_count, bool hierarchy)
|
|
{
|
|
/* If there is no geometry, we don't bother enabling anything */
|
|
|
|
if (!vertex_count)
|
|
return 0x00;
|
|
|
|
if (!hierarchy)
|
|
return panfrost_choose_tile_size(width, height, vertex_count);
|
|
|
|
/* Otherwise, default everything on. TODO: Proper tests */
|
|
|
|
return 0xFF;
|
|
}
|