We currently assume that the instruction is already inserted and we are
optimizing it away, but in the use case I have where we are hoisting
instructions into a preamble and deduplicating as we go along, that
isn't the case. Move this responsibility onto the caller, which also
makes it a bit clearer what's going on and turns this into something
more similar to an actual set.
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/29873>
This allows use cases where we copy over expression trees and
deduplicate as we go along. We can use the matching instruction to build
up the rest of the expression tree.
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/29873>
Done by hand at each call site but going very quickly with funny Vim motions and
common regexes. This is a very common idiom in NIR.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/23807>
Use a single set and ensure dominance by checking after a equivalent
instruction is found.
Besides removing the need to copy a set, this also lets us resize the set
at the start of the pass in the next commit.
ministat (CSE only):
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-984.956 +/- 28.8559
-6.90075% +/- 0.190231%
(Student's t, pooled s = 26.9052)
ministat (entire run):
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-1246.1 +/- 257.253
-0.998972% +/- 0.205094%
(Student's t, pooled s = 239.863)
Signed-off-by: Rhys Perry <pendingchaos02@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Schürmann <daniel@schuermann.dev>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Schürmann <daniel@schuermann.dev>
Reviewed-by: Rhys Perry <pendingchaos02@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6390>
This reduces the time spent in nir_opt_cse() by almost a half.
The massif tool from callgrind reported no change in peak
memory use with the large doliphin uber shaders I used for
testing.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Helland<thomashelland90@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
NIR metadata validation verifies that the debug bit was unset (by a call
to nir_metadata_preserve) if a NIR optimization pass made progress on
the shader. With the expectation that the NIR shader consists of only a
single main function, it has been safe to call nir_metadata_preserve()
iff progress was made.
However, most optimization passes calculate progress per-function and
then return the union of those calculations. In the case that an
optimization pass makes progress only on a subset of the functions in
the shader metadata validation will detect the debug bit is still set on
any unchanged functions resulting in a failed assertion.
This patch offers a quick solution (short of a larger scale refactoring
which I do not wish to undertake as part of this series) that simply
unsets the debug bit on unchanged functions.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
This matches the "foreach x in container" pattern found in many other
programming languages. Generated by the following regular expression:
s/nir_foreach_function(\([^,]*\),\s*\([^,]*\))/nir_foreach_function(\2, \1)/
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
This matches the "foreach x in container" pattern found in many other
programming languages. Generated by the following regular expression:
s/nir_foreach_instr(\([^,]*\),\s*\([^,]*\))/nir_foreach_instr(\2, \1)/
and similar expressions for nir_foreach_instr_safe etc.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
