The old function tried to work in elements which isn't, strictly speaking,
a valid thing to do. In the case of a non-power-of-two format, there is no
guarantee that the x offset into the tile is a multiple of the format
block size. This commit refactors it to work entirely in terms of a tiling
(not a surface) and bytes/rows.
Reviewed-by: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.chery@intel.com>
If a specific bit is set, the intention to create a surface with a
specific tiling format should be respected.
Signed-off-by: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.chery@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand@intel.com>
Consecutive tiles are separated by the size of the tile, not by the
logical tile width.
v2: Remove extra subtraction (Ville)
Add parenthesis (Jason)
v3: Update the unit tests for the function
Signed-off-by: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.chery@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand@intel.com>
