Split 32-bit and 64-bit fmod lowering as the drivers might need to
lower them separately inside NIR depending on the HW support.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
There are rounding errors with the division in i965 that affect
the mod(x,y) result when x = N * y. Instead of returning '0' it
was returning 'y'.
This lowering pass fixes those cases.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
This fixes two of the cases in
GL43-CTS.shader_subroutine.subroutines_not_allowed_as_variables_constructors_and_argument_or_return_types
Reviewed-by: Iago Toral Quiroga <itoral@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
resource just appears in GLSL 4.20 without any fanfare.
Fixes GL43-CTX.CommonBugs.CommonBug_ReservedNames
Reviewed-by: Iago Toral Quiroga <itoral@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From Section 7.3.1.1 (Naming Active Resources) of the OpenGL 4.5 spec:
"For the property LOCATION_COMPONENT, a single integer indicating the first
component of the location assigned to an active input or output variable is
written to params. For input and output variables with a component specified
by a layout qualifier, the specified component is written. For all other
input and output variables, the value zero is written."
Reviewed-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@gmail.com>
I don't think this will do much as it's a compiler error
to use component without location which is already in the
table but its good to be consistent.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
This is needed so we don't optimise away the varying when more than
one shares the same location.
Reviewed-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
This change checks for component overlap, including handling overlap of
locations and components by doubles. Previously there was no validation
for assigning explicit locations to a location used by the second half
of a double.
V3: simplify handling of doubles and fix double component aliasing
detection
V2: fix component matching for matricies
Reviewed-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
We make use of the existing IR field location_frac used for tracking
component locations.
Reviewed-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Parenthesis are needed here as ! takes precedence over the &. The
check had the opposite effect than intended.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
lower_vector_derefs can produce new vector_extract operations.
Neither i965 nor st_glsl_to_tgsi can handle them, so we'd best
convert them to swizzles.
Together with the previous patch, this fixes assertion failures in
GLideN64, as well as a new Piglit test which reproduces the issue:
spec/glsl-1.10/compiler/vector-dereference-in-dereference.frag
Cc: mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95164
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
The old visitor missed some cases. For example, it wouldn't handle
an ir_dereference_array with a vector_extract as the index.
Rather than trying to add the missing cases, just rewrite it as an
ir_rvalue_visitor. This makes it easy to replace any expression,
and is much less code.
Cc: mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95164
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
This generalizes the validation also to be done for variables inside
interface blocks, which, for some cases, was missing.
For a discussion about the additional validation cases included see
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2016-March/109117.html
and Khronos bug #15671.
Reviewed-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andres Gomez <agomez@igalia.com>
There is no sense in having the double version of ldexp take a 64-bit
integer. Instead, let's just take a 32-bit int all the time. This also
matches what GLSL does where both variants of ldexp take a regular integer
for the exponent argument.
Reviewed-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
The new expressions are more explicit in terms of where the bits go so it's
a little easier to tell what's going on. This is the way GLSL specifies
things so it's a bit easier to verify too. It also has the benifit that
the new expressions easily vectorize so we can constant-fold vector forms
of the _split versions correctly.
Reviewed-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
This matches the "foreach x in container" pattern found in many other
programming languages. Generated by the following regular expression:
s/nir_foreach_def(\([^,]*\),\s*\([^,]*\))/nir_foreach_def(\2, \1)/
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Lima Mitev <elima@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
This matches the "foreach x in container" pattern found in many other
programming languages. Generated by the following regular expression:
s/nir_foreach_use(\([^,]*\),\s*\([^,]*\))/nir_foreach_use(\2, \1)/
and similar expressions for nir_foreach_use_safe, etc.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
This matches the "foreach x in container" pattern found in many other
programming languages. Generated by the following regular expression:
s/nir_foreach_function(\([^,]*\),\s*\([^,]*\))/nir_foreach_function(\2, \1)/
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
This matches the "foreach x in container" pattern found in many other
programming languages.
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Lima Mitev <elima@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
This matches the "foreach x in container" pattern found in many other
programming languages. Generated by the following regular expression:
s/nir_foreach_phi_src(\([^,]*\),\s*\([^,]*\))/nir_foreach_phi_src(\2, \1)/
and a similar expression for nir_foreach_phi_src_safe.
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Lima Mitev <elima@igalia.com>
This matches the "foreach x in container" pattern found in many other
programming languages. Generated by the following regular expression:
s/nir_foreach_instr(\([^,]*\),\s*\([^,]*\))/nir_foreach_instr(\2, \1)/
and similar expressions for nir_foreach_instr_safe etc.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
