This is mostly copied from si_print_texture_info, with the si-specific
bits removed. Moving it into common code will allow to use it from both
radeonsi and radv.
Signed-off-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/5734>
This primarily tests that:
- multiple GPUs with the same GPU modifier parameters result
in the same tiling layout.
- The size & alignment calculations don't change for a given
modifier & image parameters.
It does this primarily based on addrlib. Radeonsi has used addrlib
for the retiling of displayable DCC for a while already, so the
DCC tiling should be pretty reliable.
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6176>
With arrays we really have to use the correct size for the base
mipmap to get the right array pitch. In particular, using
surf_pitch results in pitch that is bigger than the base mipmap
and hence results in wrong pitches computed by the HW.
It seems that on GFX9 this has mostly been hidden by the epitch
provided in the descriptor but this is not something we do on
GFX10 anymore.
Now this has some draw-backs:
1. normalized coordinates don't work
2. Bounds checking uses slightly bigger bounds.
2 mostly is not an issue as we still ensure that they're within
the texture memory and not overlapping other layers/mips, but
we can't properly ignore writes.
1 is kinda dead in the water ... On the other hand I'd argue that
using normalized coords & a filter for sampling a block view of
a compressed format is extraordinarily useless.
The old method we employed already had these drawbacks for everything
except the base miplevel of the imageview.
AFAICT this is the same tradeoff AMDVLK makes and no CTS test hits
this. (once it does I think the HW is dead in the water ... Only
workaround I can think of is shader processing which is hard because
we don't know texture formats at compile time.)
I also removed the extra calculations when the image has only 1 mip
level because they ended up being a no-op in that case.
CC: mesa-stable
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/2292
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/2266
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/2483
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/2906
Gitlab: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/3607
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/7090>
Lets just do depth interop imports by convention between radv and
radeonsi for now. The only thing using this should be Vulkan interop
anyway.
CC: mesa-stable
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6617>
The retile maps are a software mechanism and hence very suceptible
to change. As such I'd like to avoid making it part of the cross
driver ABI.
Ideally we'd just use the cached tile info + a shader to avoid these
buffers altogether.
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6783>
Otherwise we might get VM_L2_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS errors.
Fixes: 8275dc1ed5 ("ac/surface: fix epitch when modifying surf_pitch")
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/5841>
However complicated DCC addressing is it is still based on tiles.
If we have the intra-tile offsets + tile dimensions we can expand
that to the full image ourselves.
Behavior around ~1080p on a 2500U:
old:
30-60 ms on every miss
new:
5 ms initally (miss in the tile cache)
<0.5 ms afterwards
The most common case is that the tile cache only contains data for
2 tiles, which for Raven/Renoir/Navi14 will be 4 KiB each, so the
size increase is fairly modest.
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/5865>
If flags.display isn't set, then displayable DCC will not be computed, so
is_displayable will always be false.
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/5424>
This reduces overhead when resizing windows or when allocating
similar image sizes over and over again.
v2: optimize the memory footprint of the cache
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/5398>
The retile map is not used in this case, and the retile map computation
takes 39% of CPU time when resizing a window.
This brings it down to 23%.
The dcc_retile_use_uint16 setting has to be derived from DCC sizes.
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/5398>
This is needed otherwise it can cause bad rendering of UYVY files.
The align(..., 256 / surf->bpe) constraint comes from addrlib.
Fixes: 69aadc4933 ("radeonsi: fix surf_pitch for subsampled surface")
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/5314>
The indentation is on purpose. The whole file will be reindented to this
code style some other time.
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4863>
The indentation is on purpose. The whole file will be reindented to this
code style some other time.
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4863>
DCC_DECOMPRESS doesn't work. Instead of trying to figure out why,
use a compute blit where the load is compressed and the store is
uncompressed.
Acked-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4761>
