If we can't fit all the VS outputs into the MRF, we need to overflow into
temporary GRF registers, then use some MOVs and a second brw_urb_WRITE()
instruction to place the overflow vertex results into the URB.
This is hit when a vertex/fragment shader pair has a large number of varying
variables (12 or more).
There's still something broken here, but it seems close...
This was only present for the sake of GL_ARB_shadow_ambient which we
never implemented in Gallium. If we someday want GL_ARB_shadow_ambient
we can implement it in the state tracker by adding a MAD after the
relevant TEX instructions.
Swrast was missing a free for the culmination of driConcatConfigs.
Use free(), not _mesa_free() since we shouldn't be calling any Mesa
functions from the GLX code. driConcatConfigs() should probably use
regular malloc/free to be consistant but the Mesa functions just wrap
the libc functions anyway.
When a buffer was mapped for write and no explicit flush range was provided
the existing semantics were that the whole buffer would be flushed, mostly
for backwards compatability with non map-buffer-range aware code.
However if the buffer was mapped/unmapped with nothing really written --
something that often happens with the vbo -- we were unnecessarily assuming
that the whole buffer was written.
The new PIPE_BUFFER_USAGE_FLUSH_EXPLICIT flag (based from ARB_map_buffer_range
's GL_MAP_FLUSH_EXPLICIT_BIT flag) allows to clearly distinguish the
legacy usage from the nothing written usage.
The gl_PointCoord attribute is currently expected to be in the fog coord
register's z/w components. This was never totally fleshed out though.
This is just some placeholder code.
This reverts commit de447afff2 but
puts the lock under DRI1-only.
From keithw:
> It's there because the DRI1 code doesn't actually achieve the mutexing
> which it looks as if it should. For multi-threaded applications it was
> always possible to get two threads inside locked regions -- I have no
> idea how, but it certainly was and presumably still is possible.
This would cause LOCK_HARDWARE to mutex all contexts in this process on
both DRI1 and DRI2. On DRI1, LOCK_HARDWARE already does it for all
processes on the system. On DRI2, LOCK_HARDWARE doesn't, but there shouldn't
be any state outside the context that needs any additional protection.
Notably, the bufmgr is protected by its own mutex and not
LOCK_HARDWARE.
This code was originally introduced with the i915tex code dump, so it's not
clear what it was there for.
