next-wait is from a quirk of packing that the dependency indices are
"off by one"; we don't emulate this quirk in the IR since it's easy
enough to patch over in the disassembler. Let's not confuse anybody with
it.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4097>
Do the absolute simplest possible thing -- create a clause for every
instruction, and just pick whichever slot we can, nopping the other,
copying whatever constant we have whether it's used or not.
To be clear - this is not to be used in a production compiler. But this
lets actual bundles and clauses show up in the BIR, which unblocks work
on final code generation and packing (which can happen more or less in
parallel to NIR->BIR, optimization, register allocation, and writing an
actual scheduling).
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4097>
In the laziest possible way... We can just emit worst case moves which
DCE will eat for breakfast anyway, and inline constants on instructions
where that is supported directly. This approach eliminates a lot of
nasty corner cases that Midgard's crazy cache scheme has hit, at the
expense of slightly more work for DCE (but it's only a single iteration
of an O(N) pass that has to run anyway..)
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4097>
Not very useful without also handling breaks and continues, of course.
We use the strategy from v3d (vir_to_nir) instead of Midgard's, since
the latter is mildly insane. I mean, it passes deqp but...
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4097>
Normally mesa/st would do this for us, but we're using the standalone
compiler (in advance of having the hardware) and need this pass
particularly for fragment writeout.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4097>
Copypaste from Midgard with some cleanups. That seems to be a trend
these days. Hopefully boilerplate will come to a close soon.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4097>
Pretty much a copypaste from Midgard except where architectural
decisions diverge around vectorization. On that note, we will need our
own ALU scalarization pass at some point (or rather we'll need to extend
nir_lower_alu_scalar) to allow partial lowering for 8/16-bit ops. I.e.
we'll approximately need to lower
vec4 16 ssa_2 = fadd ssa_0, ssa_1
to
vec2 16 ssa_2 = fadd ssa_0.xy, ssa_1.xy
vec2 16 ssa_3 = fadd ssa_0.zw, ssa_1.zw
vec4 16 ssa_4 = vec4 ssa_2.x, ssa_2.y, ssa_3.x, ssa_4
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4097>
make_surface() contained a giant if-tree for creation of aux surfaces.
Move the if-tree into its own function, add_aux_surface_if_supported().
This will simplify future changes for VK_EXT_image_drm_format_modifier.
This patch merely moves the code verbatim, then extracts duplicate
assertions to the top.
v2: Rename func to add_aux_surface_if_supported [for jekstrand].
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4096>
The function returns true if hardware limitations require the image
plane to use a shadow surface. It replaces equivalent code in
make_surface().
Refactor only. No intended change in behavior.
Why extract this code out of vkCreateImage? If an image requires
a shadow surface, then that may impact its support for DRM format
modifiers, which must be evaluated during
vkGetPhysicalDeviceImageFormatProperties2.
v2:
- Use early return. [for jekstrand]
- Unexport function.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4096>
These block member have been split into individual vars so we need
to set the correct offsets for each member in the new glsl nir
linker. We also take this opportunity to set the correct location
for the variable.
Reviewed-by: Alejandro Piñeiro <apinheiro@igalia.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4050>
The current ARB_gl_spirv linking only supports explicit layouts so
we need to update it to support std140 and std430 layouts before
we can use the linker for glsl.
Reviewed-by: Alejandro Piñeiro <apinheiro@igalia.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4050>
This defines a new BRW_ANALYSIS object which wraps the register
pressure computation code along with its result. For the rationale
see the previous commits converting the liveness and dominance
analysis passes to the IR analysis framework.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4012>
It makes sense to keep the result of analysis passes independent from
the IR itself. Instead of representing the idom tree as a pointer in
each basic block pointing to its immediate dominator, the whole
dominator tree is represented separately from the IR as an array of
pointers inside the idom_tree object. This has the advantage that
it's no longer possible to use stale dominance results by accident
without having called require() beforehand, which makes sure that the
idom tree is recalculated if necessary.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4012>
