panvk: soften the language around opt-in

We already have and use vk_warn_non_conformant_implementation(), so
we're already being clear that PanVK is not yet conformant. Let's not
repeat that information here, and instead focus on it not being
well-tested.

This brings the wording more or less in-line with NVK.

Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/32561>
This commit is contained in:
Erik Faye-Lund 2024-12-09 15:52:25 +01:00 committed by Marge Bot
parent deab81fb0d
commit 12067727fa

View file

@ -77,10 +77,10 @@ create_kmod_dev(struct panvk_physical_device *device,
if (!getenv("PAN_I_WANT_A_BROKEN_VULKAN_DRIVER")) {
close(fd);
return panvk_errorf(
instance, VK_ERROR_INCOMPATIBLE_DRIVER,
"WARNING: panvk is not a conformant vulkan implementation, "
"pass PAN_I_WANT_A_BROKEN_VULKAN_DRIVER=1 if you know what you're doing.");
return panvk_errorf(instance, VK_ERROR_INCOMPATIBLE_DRIVER,
"WARNING: panvk is not well-tested, pass "
"PAN_I_WANT_A_BROKEN_VULKAN_DRIVER=1 "
"if you know what you're doing.");
}
if (instance->debug_flags & PANVK_DEBUG_STARTUP)