From 12067727fa8467f15ec7e3c736ad88b446360cd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Erik Faye-Lund Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:52:25 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] panvk: soften the language around opt-in We already have and use vk_warn_non_conformant_implementation(), so we're already being clear that PanVK is not yet conformant. Let's not repeat that information here, and instead focus on it not being well-tested. This brings the wording more or less in-line with NVK. Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon Part-of: --- src/panfrost/vulkan/panvk_physical_device.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/panfrost/vulkan/panvk_physical_device.c b/src/panfrost/vulkan/panvk_physical_device.c index d73e93c46b1..aa83b998a53 100644 --- a/src/panfrost/vulkan/panvk_physical_device.c +++ b/src/panfrost/vulkan/panvk_physical_device.c @@ -77,10 +77,10 @@ create_kmod_dev(struct panvk_physical_device *device, if (!getenv("PAN_I_WANT_A_BROKEN_VULKAN_DRIVER")) { close(fd); - return panvk_errorf( - instance, VK_ERROR_INCOMPATIBLE_DRIVER, - "WARNING: panvk is not a conformant vulkan implementation, " - "pass PAN_I_WANT_A_BROKEN_VULKAN_DRIVER=1 if you know what you're doing."); + return panvk_errorf(instance, VK_ERROR_INCOMPATIBLE_DRIVER, + "WARNING: panvk is not well-tested, pass " + "PAN_I_WANT_A_BROKEN_VULKAN_DRIVER=1 " + "if you know what you're doing."); } if (instance->debug_flags & PANVK_DEBUG_STARTUP)