This avoids inconsistencies between the LITEST_ enum value and the
shortname but also makes it easier to grep for any test cases that use
the same define. At the cost of the test names not looking very nice
anymore but oh well.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libinput/-/merge_requests/1157>
The test device initialization code was a bit of duplicated boilerplate and
required adding a reference to the devices to the 'devices' list in litest.c.
Automate this with a new TEST_DEVICE macro that adds the devices to a custom
section in the binary, then loops throught that section to get the device out.
This reduces the boilerplate for each test device to just the TEST_MACRO and
the LITEST_foo device enum entry. It also now automates the shortname of the
device.
The device's shortname was standardised in this approach as well, lowercase
and dashes only.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
There's no guarantee that libinput does the right thing if memory allocation
fails and it's such a niche case on the systems we're targeting that it just
doesn't matter. Simply abort if zalloc ever fails.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Don't rely on BTN_TOUCH for "finger down", the value for that is hardcoded in
the kernel and not always suitable. Some devices need a different value to
avoid reacting to accidental touches or hovering fingers.
Implement a basic Schmitt trigger, same as we have in the synaptics driver. We
also take the default values from there but these will likely see some
updates.
A special case is when we have more fingers down than slots. Since we can't
detect the pressure on fake fingers (we only get a bit for 'is down') we
assume that *all* fingers are down with sufficient pressure. It's too much of
a niche case to have this work any other way.
This patch drops the handling of ABS_DISTANCE because it's simply not needed
anymore.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We have one. Yay. Lucky us. Go forth and celebrate.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Yong Bakos <ybakos@humanoriented.com>