Requires splitting out the X230 one so we don't accidentally break things if
we ever change this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
This test is supposed to test for the timeout kicking in on edge scrolling -
if the finger is in the edge for longer than the timeout, we switch to
scrolling without requiring the motion threshold to be met first.
To emulate this, move the finger ever so slightly first to load up the motion
history, then timeout, then move. We expect a bunch of motion events with a
small delta.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Makes the code more straightforward, and we now require the devices to
have a height/width anyway.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Don't open-code the rate-limited log messages, use a simple wrapper instead.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
A device with REL_X/Y and keys gets marked only as ID_INPUT_KEY, initializes
as keyboard and then segfaults when we send x/y coordinates - pointer
acceleration never initializes.
Ignore the events and log a bug instead. This intentionally only papers over
the underlying issue, let's wait for a real device to trigger this and then
look at the correct solution.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
This is step one to fixing trackpoint acceleration, separating it from the
other acceleration code. No functional changes yet, it still uses the low-dpi
accel method.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91369
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
This is "once-tested, don't touch it again" code. The quirks on the touchpad
means we'd have to find that specific device again and re-test everything if
we change anything elsewhere in the code. So duplicate it properly, so that we
don't have to touch it again.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Instead of going straight to pointer_notify_axis, go through
evdev_notify_axis() which flips the scroll direction around for us.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91597
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The previous approach to pointer acceleration was to initialize the same
motion filter behavior but a different acceleration profile depending on the
hardware (the profile converts a speed to a multiplier for input deltas).
To be more flexible for hardware-specifics, change this into a set of specific
pointer acceleration init functions. This patch has no effective functional
changes, they're still all the same.
The acceleration functions are kept for direct access by the ptraccel-debug
tool.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
No functional changes, just moving code in preparation for filter patches
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
And switch to a code-flow that's a bit more self-explanatory than the current
min/max combinations.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
This makes it more obvious where we're using units/us and units/ms as input
variable and what the output is. Clutters up the code, but still better than
dealing with us/ms differently per function, and still better than carrying
all the 1000.0 multiplications/divisions manually.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
The return value of a profile is a unitless factor, not a speed.
Same applies for s1/s2, these are factors, not speeds.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
This reverts commit 8a6825f160.
Aside from introducing bugs, this doesn't really help with anything, it adds a
requirement to rename everything to make clear where we're using µs and where
we're using ms and that just clutters up the code.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
The previous code used a 5mm threshold before axis events were posted. This
threshold was on top of the 2mm 2fg threshold (and timeout handling) in the
gesture code and effectively prevented events from being sent after a timeout,
or in the 2mm-5mm range.
We still want a directional lock though, so split the two out. The default 5mm
threshold is set to 0 for touchpads since we have our own handling of the
threshold there. The directional lock only applies once scrollin has started
and remains on 5mm.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
This will thus work if the property is only set on a parent device, not on the
device directly.
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/763
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Add arg --with-libunwind for configure so it's optional to check
libunwind, which is helpfull to make deterministic builds.
Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The new values were in units/us and didn't make the switch back to ms in
8a6825f160.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
If the touchpad is higher than 50mm, enable bottom area thumb detection. This
only applies to the bottom-most 8mm and only if the touch remains unmoving in
that area.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Holding the fingers in place without moving for 500ms is long enough to lock
in a scroll gesture, especially while we're still waiting for the rest of the
stack to expose pinch gestures.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The first finger is accurate, it's just the second finger that is imprecise,
so we can't handle it as a true touch. Instead, revert the device back to
being a single-touch touchpad and use the fake touch bits for second finger
handling.
Two-finger scrolling thus becomes usable though we will lose out on
other features like thumb detection. Useful scrolling trumps that though.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Unlike ALPS and Synaptics semi-mt touchpads, the Elantech touchpads appear to
be precise enough to allow a smaller motion threshold before we decide on the
type of gesture (pinch vs scroll).
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91475
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Follow-up to eb146677e, if we disable 2fg scrolling on those touchpads we
should also disable gestures. The data doesn't magically become more useful.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Not all multi-finger touchpads are able to reliably produce gestures, so make
it optional. This patch just adds a boolean (currently always true) that gets
set on touchpad init time, i.e. it is not run-time configurable.
Three and four-finger gestures are filtered out in gesture_notify(), if the
cap isn't set the event is discarded.
For two-finger gestures we prevent a transition to PINCH, so we don't
inadvertently detect a pinch gesture and then not send events. This way, a 2fg
gesture is always scroll.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
There is no need here to use µs since we're just handling speeds/thresholds,
not actual events where a ms granularity can be too high.
Moving back to ms lets us drop a bunch of zeroes that clutter up the code, and
since the acceleration functions are a bit magic anyway, having the various
1000.0 factors in there makes it even less obvious.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
That's where we set the pointer cap too.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
