Switch to a pure factor with a max scaled after a function. The offset is just
0 now (will be removed eventually). Both are determined with a function based
on a linear/exponential regression of a sample set of data pairs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
There's no guarantee that libinput does the right thing if memory allocation
fails and it's such a niche case on the systems we're targeting that it just
doesn't matter. Simply abort if zalloc ever fails.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
doxygen ends the @bug command when a new section command (@code) is
encountered, leaving us with an "Example code:" on the Bug List page.
Add an empty line to cut off here.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Apple touchpads don't use ABS_MT_PRESSURE but they are multitouch touchpads,
so the current pressure-based handling code doesn't apply because it expects
slot-based pressure for mt touchpads.
Apple does however send useful data for ABS_MT_WIDTH_MAJOR/MINOR, so let's use
that instead. The data provided in those is more-or-less random, so we need a
hwdb entry to track the acceptable thresholds.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If the keyboard is removed while dwt thinks it is in active state, that state
is never reset and subsequent touches are ignored.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101743
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This reduces unexpected cursor moves when placing the thumb near the border
of trackpoint buttons and upper edge of touchpad.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101574
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If the touchpad is suspended and resumed (e.g. lid switch), the initial slot
state may be out of sync. If a touch happened while the touchpad was suspended
and the next touch down is on exactly the same x and/or y coordinate, our
touch point would still have the coordinates of the most recently seen touch
(i.e. before touchpad suspend). This could cause a pointer jump or test case
failures.
The real-world impact of this is minimal, putting the finger down in exactly
the same spot is virtually impossible. It could cause a test case failure in the
lid_disable_touchpad() test though, the second touch sequence was on the same
y coordinate and the touch location for that whole sequence was x/0.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We used to completely ignore a finger that was within the top software button
area and then moved to the main area and remained there for a timeout. This
avoids erroneous pointer movements when the user moves the finger while using
the trackpoint.
But we also ignored physical clicks, something we should not be doing. This
patch fixes that behavior: we still ignore the finger for movement, but a
physical click now triggers a left click once we've been in the area for the
timeout.
This new behavior doesn't apply within the timeout, i.e. if a finger is in the
right top button area, moves out and immediately clicks, we still trigger a
right click. This avoids erroneous switches to left-clicks when the finger is
at the edge of the button area and moves out during the press.
Related to: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99212
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If a touch goes past the fixed pressure threshold it is labelled as a palm and
stays a palm. Default value is one that works well here on a T440 and is
virtually impossible to trigger by a normal finger or thumb. A udev property
is exposed so we can handle this in the udev hwdb and the new tool introduce a
few commits ago can help finding the palm detection threshold.
Unlike the other palm detection features, once a palm goes past the threshold
it remains a palm until the touch is released. This means palm overrides any
other palm detection features. For code simplicity, we don't combine the
states but merely check for pressure before and after the other palm detection
functions. If the pressure triggers, it will trigger before anything else. And
if something else is already active (e.g. edge where the pressure doesn't work
well) it will trigger as soon as the palm is released.
The palm threshold should thus be chosen with some room to spare between the
highest finger pressure.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94236
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Most modern touchpads are around 100mm wide, so this provides a ca 8mm edge
zone on each side. The extra 3mm should provide for more reliable palm
detection, a few touches happen to be just on the edge of the 5mm mark.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101433
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Do so on the synaptics serial touchpads at least, they're known to cause
cursor jumps when the third finger is down. Not detecting a tap move means
three-finger taps get more reliable on these touchpads.
This change affects gestures who now effectively have to wait for the tap
timeout to happen. It's a trade-off.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101435https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455443
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Fixes compiler warning:
evdev.c:2899:2: warning: 'pri' may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
On unreliable tablets (Surface3), always force the lid switch to open when the
paired keyboard is removed. This way the lid can't be stuck in a closed state
when there's nothing attached that can actually trigger that state.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101100
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
On unreliable LID switches, we might have the LID declared as closed
while it is actually not. We can not wait for the first switch event to setup
the keyboard listener: it will never occur.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101099
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
What we do not want is libinput to believe the LID is closed while
it's not. But the internal notifier state need to be in sync with the evdev
node, or it's going to be a pain setting the keyboard listener.
But since we don't know if the state is reliable, we track the internal state
separately from the external state so that we can set up the keyboard listener
when the lid is closed, without having libinput actually send lid closed
events for unreliable devices.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101099
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Only pair if the keyboard is either tagged as internal device.
This has another (unlikely) behaviour change: previously we would override the
paired keyboards with ones that look more accurate (e.g. a usb keyboard paired
before a serial would be unpaired and the serial keyboard takes its place).
Now we assume there can only be one internal keyboard, once we have it we
ignore all others. This shouldn't matter in real life provided the tagging is
correct.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We have heuristics for detecting whether a keyboard is internal or external,
but in some cases (e.g. Surface 3) these heuristics fail. Add a udev property
that we can apply to these cases so we have something that's reliable.
This will likely eventually become ID_INPUT_KEYBOARD_INTEGRATION as shipped by
systemd, similar to the touchpad property.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101101
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
commit 3925936 introduced changes to container_of, this is hopefully the
last part of it.
In the linux kernel, container_of() takes a type name, and not a
variable. Without this, in some cases it is needed to declare an unused
variable in order to call container_of().
example:
return container_of(dispatch, struct fallback_dispatch, base);
instead of:
struct fallback_dispatch *p;
return container_of(dispatch, p, base);
This introduce also list_first_entry(), a simple wrapper around
container_of() to retrieve the first element of a non empty list. It
allows to simplify list_for_each() and list_for_each_safe().
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Laskar <gabriel@lse.epita.fr>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
gcc and clang supports offsetof (defined in stddef.h) as defined by C99
and POSIX.1-2001, use it in container_of.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Laskar <gabriel@lse.epita.fr>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This was originally left outside of the button areas in case users tap in
those zones, but we're getting false tap events in that zone.
On a 100mm touchpad, the edge zone is merely 5mm, it's acceptable to ignore
taps in that area even in the software button. We can revisit this if we see
tap detection failures in the future.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415796
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Because otherwise things go boom, but unless you passed -fshort-enums this
shouldn't happen anyway. And gcc's documentation says don't do that. So don't
do that, or we'll scream at you.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
../src/libinput.c:56:17: warning: passing an object that undergoes default
argument promotion to 'va_start' has undefined behavior [-Wvarargs]
The enum's size is compiler-defined, so the enum gets promoted to whatever the
compiler chose. That promotion is undefined, so let's use an int here.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
Fixes a bunch of warnings of the kind
../src/evdev.h:378:32: warning: variable 'f' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
return container_of(dispatch, f, base);
Just typecasting NULL means we can ignore sample but for the type.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100976
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
clang supports __typeof__ which was the only real difference. Not sure any
other compilers matter (that don't support __typeof__)
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
If the event listener is added, then removed again on a lid switch on/off
event, the list is set to null. This can trigger two crashes:
* when the keyboard is removed first, the call to
libinput_device_remove_event_listener() dereferences the null pointer
* when the switch is removed first, the call to device_destroy will find a
remaining event listener and assert
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440927
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Sequence triggered by the xorg driver, but basically: if the touchpad is
destroyed before the lid switch, the event listener wasn't removed and an
assertion was triggered.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Instead of reimplementing a for loop every time.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
