Our own reference may be the last one that's still alive if the context is
currently suspended (litest_suspend()). If we unref before removing it from
the path interface, we access already freed memory.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 40144321b234f8cee0059cf5bada8c0845065851)
The ...create() method returned the wrong device, so this one was never
actually used. Once we start using, we get test case failures related to the
device having BTN_foo events as well. For now, just disable those codes so we
have a keyboard with all keys and pass the tests. The rest needs better
fixing.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 4c4d400bcb)
A touchpad that was disabled by toggling the sendevents option would come back
normally after a lid resume, despite still being nominally disabled.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448962
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 53d53dd18e)
Devices tagged as accelerometers may also be other devices like tablet pads.
Only ignore pure accelerometer devices but disable the accelerometer axes for
devices that have multiple types.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102100
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gerecke <jason.gerecke@wacom.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7d97bb0087)
The current tests worked because all rings had the same range, so our error
margin covered for that. With the upcoming MobileStudio Pro 16 pad device, the
range is half and our error margins don't work anymore. Switch to a more
reliable approach that tests every integer value the wheel can send, even
though it relies on kernel filtering.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit e3e6406c4f)
We don't know the position of the third finger on 2-slot touchpads, differing
between swipe and pinch is reliable. Simply disable 3-finger pinch and always
use swipe; 3fg pinch is uncommon anyway and it's better to have one of the
gestures working reliably than both unreliably.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6d435cda06)
The lid dispatch interface is a one-trick pony and can only handle SW_LID. It
ignores other switches but crashes on any event type other than EV_SW and
EV_SYN. Disable those types so we just ignore the event instead of asserting.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101853
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gerecke <jason.gerecke@wacom.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6bb05c594a)
If the kernel sends us a button press for a button that is thought to be down
we have lost track of the state of the button. Ignore the button press event,
in the hope that the next release makes things right again.
A release event may be masked if another process grabs the device for some
period of time, e.g. libinput debug-events --grab.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101796
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 399c50dbeb)
If the keyboard is removed while dwt thinks it is in active state, that state
is never reset and subsequent touches are ignored.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101743
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 9e5d1df4bb)
The check framework takes and stores the pointer and expects it to be live for
the livetime of the test but it doesn't strdup it. We have to keep those
pointers around ourselves.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Do so on the synaptics serial touchpads at least, they're known to cause
cursor jumps when the third finger is down. Not detecting a tap move means
three-finger taps get more reliable on these touchpads.
This change affects gestures who now effectively have to wait for the tap
timeout to happen. It's a trade-off.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101435https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455443
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Check arranges the tests into suites and test cases (which then can have
multiple test functions). The primary feature for suites is the ability to
select them with environment variables and that the log messages are printed
per suite, not per test case.
We used the suites to distribute tests across the processes forked by the test
runner, but that also resulted in slow suites relying on timeouts (tap/dwt) to
take a lot longer than other suites and hold everything else up.
This patch basically drops the use of check test suites. Our test runner has a
--filter-group argument which selects on suite names, the log messages are
more useful if they immediately include the device and the test case name.
So we just save the test metatdata in our own struct and then assemble a
suite/test case on the fly for each test.
The advantage of this is that tests of the same suite are now distributed
across the forks so slow tests that rely on length timeouts are now run in
parallel. This brings the test runs down to under 6 min again.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This makes it possible to run multiple test suite simultaneously on the same
host without messing up the other runs (provided that all instances use
the same udev/hwdb files). Previously, removing the udev rules/hwdb at the end
of a test run would cause test case failures in other runs that hadn't
completed yet.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
No internal timeout we have takes longer than 2s, so we can abort if we don't
succeed. This gives us a better backtrace to figure out where we're hanging
than the SIGABRT that check will eventually send us.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Instead of just waiting for events, use a libinput_dispatch() and assume the
event is there when we want it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This explains the heisenbugs when running the test suite. libevdev gives us
the syspath to the /sys/.../input123 node, not the one for the event node.
The device node path is created based on the sysfs tree, so there's a
window where the device node may not exist yet but we already returned the
device node path.
In litest, we're using a udev monitor to wait until the device is ready for
us, but the path interface only takes a device node path. So what happens is:
* libevdev gives us a syspath for the input node and a device path
* the monitor receives the input node udev device and matches the syspath
* we pass that up to the caller litest_add_device_with_overrides()
which opens the device node and adds it to libinput
* the path interface creates a udev device from the device node, which still
points to the old device node. Things fail because we don't have the device
we expect or it doesn't send events and eventually times out [1].
The errors triggered by this are either odd udev property mismatches or
timeouts because events are never processed.
This race is fixed by simply constructing the actual device node path we
expect from the udev device and waiting for the right device.
[1] We rely on the caller to notify us when to remove the device and thus
silently ignore ENODEV.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
On unreliable tablets (Surface3), always force the lid switch to open when the
paired keyboard is removed. This way the lid can't be stuck in a closed state
when there's nothing attached that can actually trigger that state.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101100
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
On unreliable LID switches, we might have the LID declared as closed
while it is actually not. We can not wait for the first switch event to setup
the keyboard listener: it will never occur.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101099
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Having a litest_wait_for_event_of_type() in there causes us to silently
discard anything but the events we're looking for. This is risky, we want to
make sure that if we re-enable the lid that the key events arrive *after* the
lid open event, not before. So let's not paper over those.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We were checking for the empty queue on the wrong context, the default context
got drained a few lines above.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is most likely the first error message a developer encounters when
running the test suite and the /run/udev/rules.d directory already exists.
Make it more meaningful than the current generic integer comparison failure.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This function used to be called inside a test run a long time ago but moved to
a pre-setup stage without switching to the more generic litest_abort_msg.
The only error message we got is "check_msg.c:80: No messaging setup".
https://github.com/libcheck/check/issues/18#issuecomment-301217615
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We never installed the device groups file for the tests, effectively relying
on a system copy to be installed already.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This was originally left outside of the button areas in case users tap in
those zones, but we're getting false tap events in that zone.
On a 100mm touchpad, the edge zone is merely 5mm, it's acceptable to ignore
taps in that area even in the software button. We can revisit this if we see
tap detection failures in the future.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415796
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Running through mesontest also runs parse-hwdb through valgrind and
gives us a bunch of leaks that originate within Python somewhere - we don't
care about those.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Running valgrind through mesontest produces coredumps for a lot of tests
(unclear why, the core dump merely shows a call to abort). But even without
mesontest, creating a core dump for each failed test is a bad idea - if one
fails, most likely many others fail and the coredumps quickly fill up the file
system.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If the event listener is added, then removed again on a lid switch on/off
event, the list is set to null. This can trigger two crashes:
* when the keyboard is removed first, the call to
libinput_device_remove_event_listener() dereferences the null pointer
* when the switch is removed first, the call to device_destroy will find a
remaining event listener and assert
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440927
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Sequence triggered by the xorg driver, but basically: if the touchpad is
destroyed before the lid switch, the event listener wasn't removed and an
assertion was triggered.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We use #if everywhere else and it allows building with '-Wundef -Werror=undef'
to avoid accidental misuse.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
With autotools, we replace the @top_srcdir@ during configure and then run teh
resulting scripts.
With meson, it's easier to just pass top-srcdir it in as argument.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
test-tablet.c: In function ‘proximity_in_out’:
test-tablet.c:797:20: warning: increment of a boolean expression [-Wbool-operation]
have_tool_update++;
And tighten the test so we fail for multiple prox in events
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
check 0.11 has those macros, but they don't work the same way as our homemade
ones. So for now just #undef them
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This makes the tapping times shorter and hopefully more obvious. It also fixes
a bug where repeated tripletap (by tapping with one finger while leaving the
other two down) could cause incorrect timestamps.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100796
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
For multitap, we're one tap behind with the button clicks, i.e. we send the
first full click button on the second tap, etc. Remember the timestamps of the
touches so we can send the events with the right timestamps. This makes
tapping more accurate because the time between taps and various timeouts
matter less for double-click detection.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Without this enabled, we stay in the single/double tap part of the state
machine and a triple tap is just a double tap followed by a single tap.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
