Release one touch point at the same time as a fake touch.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Some devices require more than just flipping around the buttons, such as
tablets.
When it comes to devices like tablets, because the position of the palm rest is
on the right, the entire tablet has to be flipped around in order to be usable
by lefties. As such, this requires that we reverse the coordinates of the
tablets in addition to flipping the buttons on the tablet. As such, renaming
these functions so that they aren't specific to devices where only the buttons
are flipped seems appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Chandler Paul <thatslyude@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Sending separate axis events instead of one unified events is limiting,
especially when simultaneously scrolling in both directions and the caller
tries to implement kinetic scrolling.
Take a page from the tablet-support branch and instead implement the axis
event as a generic event that can contain multiple axes simultaneously.
Right now we only have two (scroll) axes and we could easily just check both
for non-zero values. If we want to allow further axes in the future, we need
a check whether an axis is set in an event, that's what
libinput_event_pointer_has_axis to scroll events() is for.
We also need the mask to notify of a scroll stop event, which could otherwise
be confused as a vertical-only or horizontal-only event.
This is an API and ABI break.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
For a caller to implement/provide kinetic scrolling ("inertial scrolling",
"fling scrolling"), it needs to know how the scrolling motion was implemented,
and what to expect in the future. Add this information to the pointer axis
event.
The three scroll sources we have are:
* wheels: scrolling is in discreet steps, you don't know when it ends, the
wheel will just stop sending events
* fingers: scrolling is continuous coordinate space, we know when it stops and
we can tell the caller
* continuous: scrolling is in continuous coordinate space but we may or may not
know when it stops. if scroll lock is used, the device may never technically
get out of scroll mode even if it doesn't send events at any given moment
Use case: trackpoint/trackball scroll emulation on button press
The stop event is now codified in the API documentation, so callers can use
that for kinetic scrolling. libinput does not implement kinetic scrolling
itself.
Not covered by this patch:
* The wheel event is currently defined as "typical mouse wheel step", this is
different to Qt where the step value is 1/8 of a degree. Some better
definition here may help.
* It is unclear how an absolute device would map into relative motion if the
device itself is not controlling absolute motion.
* For diagonal scrolling, the vertical/horizontal terminator events would come
in separately. The caller would have to deal with that somehow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Original patch, before the rebase onto today's master:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Add a boolean state machine for two-finger scrolling so we know when we're
currently scrolling. If we were scrolling and it stops, pick the active
touch as pointer touch so we can go back to pointer movement without having to
lift the finger off the touchpad.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86807
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The tests ignored it when motion events never happened - but that's mostly
what these tests are about. This only happened for semi-mt devices that use
the bounding box only, not separate touch points. Switching the touch points
around that the bounding box doesn't interfere causes the test to work as
expected.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
For certain applications (such as FPS games) it is necessary to use
unaccelerated motion events (the motion vector that is passed to the
acceleration filter) to get a more natural feeling. Supply this
information by passing both accelerated and unaccelerated motion
vectors to the existing motion event.
Note that the unaccelerated motion event is not equivalent to 'raw'
events as read from devices.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The previous code used delta/event as scroll trigger which roughly translates
to speed, but depends on the sampling rate of the device.
For slow two-finger motion, a user may move the height of the touchpad without
ever triggering scrolling. Change the _initial_ trigger to a cumulative
trigger, i.e. once the user moved past the threshold distance, scrolling
starts regardless of the speed.
Once scrolling is engaged, the original trigger of threshold/event is
required to engange the second scroll direction.
Note that except for really slow movements, it's very easy to engage both
scroll directions on a touchpad. This is intentional, libinput does not have
enough semantic knowledge to know if horizontal scrolling is needed. So we
provide some direction locking but not much, it's up to the
client/toolkit/widget to decide if both scroll directions should be handled.
Add a comment to clarify that in the public doc.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The touchpad tap code explicitly supports 2 finger tap-n-drag, this commit
adds a test-case for this, which fails due to the 2 finger scrolling code
sending scroll events during a 2 finger tap-n-drag.
And this commit fixes the test-case, by not sending scroll events while a
tap-n-drag is active.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The tap code will move individual touches to a state of TAP_TOUCH_STATE_DEAD
after a timeout. In case of tap-n-drag this should not have any influence,
make the litest_touch_move_to take long enough to trigger the timeout to
verify that this does not has any influence.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
In reality moving a touch from point to another takes time. In some cases
(when a timeout may trigger during the move, e.g. tap-n-drag on a touchpad),
this is important. Add a sleep_ms parameter, which will cause
litest_touch_move_to to sleep the specified amount of ms every step.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Rather than a random msleep() with a comment, use a helper function that
describes what we're waiting for. Also makes changing the timeouts easier in
the future.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2-finger scrolling only, we don't have anything else yet
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Make check_2fg_scroll functionality available outside of touchpad.c ,
no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Doing a tap-and-drag gesture but just holding the finger instead of moving
should trigger a timeout and still switchin into tap-and-drag.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
It should be possible to initiate a drag by tapping-drag, but continue
it by pressing a physical button continuing to drag by subsequent finger
motions.
As the generic evdev layer helps us ignore multiple button presses we
can have the tap machine run completely separate from and uneffected by
regular physical button presses, making the tap FSM much simpler than
adding new states for handling button presse life times from outside
of the tap state machine.
A touchpad test is updated to test click while tapping instead of tap
FSM break out. The updated test is re-added but only for clickpads only.
The tap FSM svg is updated to say "clickpad button press" instead of
"phys button press".
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
More expressive in the caller and less ambiguous about return values (is it 1?
is it non-zero? can it be negative?)
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
They don't set resolution so we can't calculate the size but we know they're
big enough to need palm detection.
And fix the descriptor for the bcm5974. For some reason this was advertising
synaptics coordinates. Fix it to represent (one of) the apple touchpads.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
On small touchpads, a touch that intends to go across the width of the
touchpad is likely to start in the edge zone. Likewise, on those touchpads the
chances of a palm event happening on the edge is small.
A minimum width of 8cm determined by an elaborate process of completely
unscientific guesswork: the x220 is roughly 7.5cm across and doesn't suffer
much from edge events, the T440s is 10cm across and definitely suffers from
it. So the trigger width likely somewhere in between which makes 8cm about as
valid as any other guess.
Note that this disables palm detection for resolution-less touchpads too - if
we don't know how big the touchpad is we can't know if palm detection on the
edges is necessary.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Any legitimate finger movement that starts in the palm area is expected to
move out of the palm area at an angle roughly orthogonal to the edge of the
touchpad. Check for the direction of the movement vector, and if it is within
the accepted cardinal/ordinal directions then proceed.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
On small touchpads a touch that is intended to traverse much of the screen
width may start at the very edge, i.e. in the palm zone.
In that case, and if the touch moves out of the palm zone quickly enough, drop
the palm label and make it a normal touchpoint.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
A large part of palm events are situated on the far edges of the touchpad. In
a test run on a T440s while typing a long email all but 2 touch points were
located in the outer ~5% of the touchpad. Define a 5% exclusion zone on the
left and right edges in which new touchpoint is automatically assigned to be a
palm.
A finger may move into that exclusion zone without being marked as palm, it
just can't start in one.
On clickpads, the exclusion zone does not extend into the software buttons.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
This breaks when we have a device resolution set on the test devices,
specificially on the T440. The current tests use a delta of 1% of the device
which with the resolution set results in an effective delta of 3 - above the
scroll threshold.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Using a 0-100% range is useful but in some cases we need events with finer
than 1% granularity.
And fix up the two-finger test that now fails. This was a bug in the test
anyway, the dx/dy supplied here was 1% of the touchpad width. Confined to
integers this meant we only ever had the touch down, then the single move by
1%. That caused two events - not enough to satisfy tp_estimate_delta, so we
always had a delta of 0/0 regardless of the size of the move.
Now with doubles this fails, so drop it to 0.1% instead, which is small enough
on all touchpads we currently have.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Now that we have run-time changes of the tap.enabled state move the check
to the IDLE state only. Otherwise the tap machine may hang if tapping is
disabled while a gesture is in progress.
Two basic tests are added to check for the tap default setting - which is now
"tap disabled by default", for two reasons:
* if you don't know that tapping is a thing (or enabled by default), you get
spurious button events that make the desktop feel buggy.
* if you do know what tapping is and you want it, you usually know where to
enable it, or at least you can search for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The current code triggers multi-finger tapping even if the finger released was
previously held on the touchpad for a while. For an event sequence of:
1. first finger down
2. first finger move past threshold/wait past timeout
3. second finger down
4. first finger up
The second finger initiates the two-finger tap state, but the button event is
sent when the first finger releases - despite that finger not meeting the
usual tap constraints. This sequence can happen whenever a user swaps fingers.
Add the finger state to the actual touchpoints and update them whenever the
constrains are broken. Then, discard button events if the respective touch
did not meet the conditions.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/76760
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
If the user puts down to fingers to scroll, then changes his mind and
lifts them, without having them moved past the initial scroll threshold in
either direction, then any movement which he has done will cause a spurious
scroll event when the second finger down is lifted first.
The problem is that t->is_pointer was not being set to false in this case,
since that is done in tp_post_twofinger_scroll after checking scroll.state
which never gets set in this scenario.
Instead of changing the order, simply completely remove scroll.state completely
it is a boolean, and everywhere we check for it we also check for the axis bits
in state.direction, so it is not necessary.
Also add a check to ensure there are no spurious motion events.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Inverted order of release from the other test
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
For those whose eyes struggle to focus on 5 zeros in a row, or those just sick
of forgetting one zero and wondering why things don't work.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Mainly testing the behaviour when clicking during a tap or tap-n-drag. Adds a
new "feature" to the litest system, Apple clickpads don't have software
buttons by default.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Checks if the queue is empty and prints informatino about any events before
failing.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
