Once the lid is closed, the keyboard event listener is set up to open the lid
for us on keyboard events. With the right sequence, we can trigger the
listener to be added to the list multiple times, triggering an assert in the
list test code (or an infinite loop in the 1.8 branch).
Conditions:
* SW_LID value 1 - sets up the keyboard listener
* keyboard event - sets lid_is_closed to false
* SW_LID value 0 - is ignored because we're already open
* SW_LID value 1 - sets up the keyboard listener again
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103298
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 41a70bbe92)
A touchpad that was disabled by toggling the sendevents option would come back
normally after a lid resume, despite still being nominally disabled.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448962
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 53d53dd18e)
The lid dispatch interface is a one-trick pony and can only handle SW_LID. It
ignores other switches but crashes on any event type other than EV_SW and
EV_SYN. Disable those types so we just ignore the event instead of asserting.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101853
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gerecke <jason.gerecke@wacom.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6bb05c594a)
On unreliable tablets (Surface3), always force the lid switch to open when the
paired keyboard is removed. This way the lid can't be stuck in a closed state
when there's nothing attached that can actually trigger that state.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101100
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
On unreliable LID switches, we might have the LID declared as closed
while it is actually not. We can not wait for the first switch event to setup
the keyboard listener: it will never occur.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101099
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Having a litest_wait_for_event_of_type() in there causes us to silently
discard anything but the events we're looking for. This is risky, we want to
make sure that if we re-enable the lid that the key events arrive *after* the
lid open event, not before. So let's not paper over those.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We were checking for the empty queue on the wrong context, the default context
got drained a few lines above.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If the event listener is added, then removed again on a lid switch on/off
event, the list is set to null. This can trigger two crashes:
* when the keyboard is removed first, the call to
libinput_device_remove_event_listener() dereferences the null pointer
* when the switch is removed first, the call to device_destroy will find a
remaining event listener and assert
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440927
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Sequence triggered by the xorg driver, but basically: if the touchpad is
destroyed before the lid switch, the event listener wasn't removed and an
assertion was triggered.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
These tablets only ever give us a close event, the open event is broken. So
when we detect keyboard events, fix the kernel device's state by writing the
event to the fd.
We still sync the lid state manually, in case this fails and we don't get the
SW_LID through the normal event sequence. If it works fine, the real open
event will just be ignored.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Extra insurance against broken lid switches. Listen to events from the
(internal) keyboard when we are logically closed. If any, assume we're open
after all and update accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is the default behavior, based on the theory of hardware actually doing
the right thing. That's not always the case, follow-up patches will change
when we do the theoretically ideal thing.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Ship a custom udev rule for the test device until systemd v333 is commonplace.
Signed-off-by: James Ye <jye836@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
