If the keyboard is removed while dwt thinks it is in active state, that state
is never reset and subsequent touches are ignored.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101743
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 9e5d1df4bb)
Most modern touchpads are around 100mm wide, so this provides a ca 8mm edge
zone on each side. The extra 3mm should provide for more reliable palm
detection, a few touches happen to be just on the edge of the 5mm mark.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101433
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 381cce8ddd)
Do so on the synaptics serial touchpads at least, they're known to cause
cursor jumps when the third finger is down. Not detecting a tap move means
three-finger taps get more reliable on these touchpads.
This change affects gestures who now effectively have to wait for the tap
timeout to happen. It's a trade-off.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101435https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455443
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Fixes compiler warning:
evdev.c:2899:2: warning: 'pri' may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
On unreliable tablets (Surface3), always force the lid switch to open when the
paired keyboard is removed. This way the lid can't be stuck in a closed state
when there's nothing attached that can actually trigger that state.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101100
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
On unreliable LID switches, we might have the LID declared as closed
while it is actually not. We can not wait for the first switch event to setup
the keyboard listener: it will never occur.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101099
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
What we do not want is libinput to believe the LID is closed while
it's not. But the internal notifier state need to be in sync with the evdev
node, or it's going to be a pain setting the keyboard listener.
But since we don't know if the state is reliable, we track the internal state
separately from the external state so that we can set up the keyboard listener
when the lid is closed, without having libinput actually send lid closed
events for unreliable devices.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101099
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Only pair if the keyboard is either tagged as internal device.
This has another (unlikely) behaviour change: previously we would override the
paired keyboards with ones that look more accurate (e.g. a usb keyboard paired
before a serial would be unpaired and the serial keyboard takes its place).
Now we assume there can only be one internal keyboard, once we have it we
ignore all others. This shouldn't matter in real life provided the tagging is
correct.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We have heuristics for detecting whether a keyboard is internal or external,
but in some cases (e.g. Surface 3) these heuristics fail. Add a udev property
that we can apply to these cases so we have something that's reliable.
This will likely eventually become ID_INPUT_KEYBOARD_INTEGRATION as shipped by
systemd, similar to the touchpad property.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101101
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
commit 3925936 introduced changes to container_of, this is hopefully the
last part of it.
In the linux kernel, container_of() takes a type name, and not a
variable. Without this, in some cases it is needed to declare an unused
variable in order to call container_of().
example:
return container_of(dispatch, struct fallback_dispatch, base);
instead of:
struct fallback_dispatch *p;
return container_of(dispatch, p, base);
This introduce also list_first_entry(), a simple wrapper around
container_of() to retrieve the first element of a non empty list. It
allows to simplify list_for_each() and list_for_each_safe().
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Laskar <gabriel@lse.epita.fr>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
gcc and clang supports offsetof (defined in stddef.h) as defined by C99
and POSIX.1-2001, use it in container_of.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Laskar <gabriel@lse.epita.fr>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This was originally left outside of the button areas in case users tap in
those zones, but we're getting false tap events in that zone.
On a 100mm touchpad, the edge zone is merely 5mm, it's acceptable to ignore
taps in that area even in the software button. We can revisit this if we see
tap detection failures in the future.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415796
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Because otherwise things go boom, but unless you passed -fshort-enums this
shouldn't happen anyway. And gcc's documentation says don't do that. So don't
do that, or we'll scream at you.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
../src/libinput.c:56:17: warning: passing an object that undergoes default
argument promotion to 'va_start' has undefined behavior [-Wvarargs]
The enum's size is compiler-defined, so the enum gets promoted to whatever the
compiler chose. That promotion is undefined, so let's use an int here.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
Fixes a bunch of warnings of the kind
../src/evdev.h:378:32: warning: variable 'f' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
return container_of(dispatch, f, base);
Just typecasting NULL means we can ignore sample but for the type.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100976
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
clang supports __typeof__ which was the only real difference. Not sure any
other compilers matter (that don't support __typeof__)
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Armin Krezović <krezovic.armin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
If the event listener is added, then removed again on a lid switch on/off
event, the list is set to null. This can trigger two crashes:
* when the keyboard is removed first, the call to
libinput_device_remove_event_listener() dereferences the null pointer
* when the switch is removed first, the call to device_destroy will find a
remaining event listener and assert
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440927
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Sequence triggered by the xorg driver, but basically: if the touchpad is
destroyed before the lid switch, the event listener wasn't removed and an
assertion was triggered.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Instead of reimplementing a for loop every time.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The Elantech touchpad model binding in udev is currently unused, since
pressure values were moved to a udev binding of their own.
This gets rid of the deprecated model binding.
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@paulk.fr>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is for debugging purposes only, we cannot guarantee that event timestamps
always go up - at least not across devices. Example: tapping on a touchpad may
delay an event until a timeout expires, but that event is then sent with the
original touch timestamps (i.e. in the past). If any other device produces
events during that timeout period, our timestamps are out-of-order.
This isn't really a bug because we are forced to do that, but for bug-fixing
it can be useful to detect.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This makes the tapping times shorter and hopefully more obvious. It also fixes
a bug where repeated tripletap (by tapping with one finger while leaving the
other two down) could cause incorrect timestamps.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100796
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
For multitap, we're one tap behind with the button clicks, i.e. we send the
first full click button on the second tap, etc. Remember the timestamps of the
touches so we can send the events with the right timestamps. This makes
tapping more accurate because the time between taps and various timeouts
matter less for double-click detection.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
A leftover from synaptics where we do this detection in the driver. libinput
pushes this to the hwdb and sets the model flags accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is a leftover from when libinput was part of weston and we could
interpret properties correctly. Realistically, the only way this could work
with libinput as external library is if we define precisely what the
definition of an output is. Practically, it's a lot easier to just throw up
our hands and leave it all to the caller.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100707
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
Try to guess the default scroll buttons a bit better. Right now we default to
scroll button 0 (disabled) whenever a device doesn't have a middle button but
we might as well cast a wider net here as setting a scroll button only has a
direct effect when button scrolling is enabled.
Use the first extra button we find or fall back onto the right button if we
don't have any extra buttons.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
