When finger movement exceeded the motion threshold before the finger was
recognized as a thumb, it would never be regarded as a thumb by the tap system.
This prohibited tapping until the thumb was lifted.
This is fixed by moving the check for the thumb state up such that it
happens before the motion threshold check.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit af86152370)
Introduced in 416fa44d80 but there was a logic
error: we claimed to require 3 events from a trackpoint before stopping the
touchpad but the timer was only set when we actually stopped the touchpad. So
if a trackpoint sends a single event every second, we'd disable the touchpad
after 3 seconds for the duration of the timeout, then again 3 seconds later,
etc.
Fix this by always setting the timeout and resetting the event counter if no
activity happened.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit c0fd857def)
If a touch is in TOUCH_NONE, there is nothing to see here, please move along.
In the case of bug 105696, we were accessing the speed.exceeded_count of a
touch that was released previously, erroneously detecting a speed-based thumb.
The sequence was:
- touch down in slot 0, speed.exceeded_count is reset to 0
- move touch until exceeded_count is greater than our threshold
- touch up in slot 0
- touch down in slot 1 [1]
- touch down in slot 2 (more than 25mm away)
- we counted the slot 0 speed.exceeded_count, labeling the slot 2 touch as
speed-based thumb
[1] peculiar behavior only observed on this device, usually slots get re-used
at the first opportunity so having an inactive slot followed by higher slots
being used is unusual.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105696
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 928bad9104)
Regression introduced by 3979b9e16a, bug 105258.
With that commit, we only ended real touches when we had less than nslots fake
fingers down. i.e. tripletap on a 2 slot touchpad would not end the
first/second touch even if the pressure goes below the threshold. e.g. Lenovo
x270 needs this, see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=137672, it
dips below the pressure threshold for the first slot and ends the second slot
in the same frame as the third finger is detected. Fun times.
Anyway, this breaks semi-mt touchpads, another fine category of devices,
because some of those can detect hovering fingers at low pressure, see bug
105535. Because semi-mt devices are generally garbage, we treat them as
single-touch devices instead. So whenever two fingers are down, we treat both
as above the pressure threshold, even when they're physicall hovering.
Fix this by making the x270 fix conditional on at least 2 slots.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105535
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 3f5ff113a8)
This state is used by the pre-processing of the touch states to indicate that
the touch point has ended and is changed to TOUCH_END as soon as that
pre-processing is finished.
Sometimes we have to resurrect a touch point that has physically or logically
ended but needs to be kept around to keep the BTN_TOOL_* fake finger count
happy. Particularly on Synaptics touchpads, where a BTN_TOOL_TRIPLETAP can
cause a touch point to end (i.e. 1 touch down + TRIPLETAP) but that touch
restarts in the next sequence. We had a quirk for this in place already, but
if we end the touch and then re-instate it with tp_begin_touch(), we may lose
some information about thumb/palm/etc. states that touch already had. As a
result, the state machines can get confused and a touch that was previously
ignored as thumb suddenly isn't one anymore and triggers assertions.
The specific sequence in bug 10528 is:
* touch T1 down
* touch T2 down, detected as speed-based thumb, tap state machine ignores
it
* frame F: TRIPLETAP down, touch T2 up
* frame F+1: touch T2 down in next frame, but without the thumb bit
* frame F+n: touch T2 ends, tap state machine gets confused because
that touch should not trigger a release
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105258
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 6ccd8e934f)
If we have more BTN_TOOL_*TAP fingers down than we have slots, ignore any
below-threshold pressure changes on the slots. When a touchpad only detects
two touches, guessing whether the third touch has sufficient pressure is
unreliable. Instead, always assume that all touches have sufficient pressure
when we exceed the slot number.
Exception: if all real fingers are below the pressure threshold, the fake
fingers are ignored too.
Related to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105258
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 3979b9e16a)
Only the appletouch has pressure and thus executed that code path
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 21b83dfd0b)
This test worked because on devices that don't use pressure the touches were
reset when BTN_TOUCH when to 0, triggering the 'ignore fake fingers when no
real fingers are down' behavior. But this is a different code path than the
pressure handling, so let's separate those tests.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 990da54aa6)
If a single-touch touchpad drops below the pressure threshold in the same
frame where a fake finger is added, we begin a fake touch here. The subsequent
loop ends this fake touch because real_fingers_down is 0.
This causes the tapping code to have a mismatch of how many fingers are down
because it never sees the touch begin event for that finger.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
(cherry picked from commit 01a633b6eb)
A set of wireless devices that can scramble the timestamps, so we get
press/release within 8ms even though I doubt the user is capable of doing
this. Since they're generally good quality anyway, let's just disable
debouncing on those until someone complains and we need something more
sophisticated.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104415
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 3a3fd645c4)
So we don't have to have newline handling in the callers. This effectively
reverts 6ab2999be9 "test: detect linebreaks in log messages".
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104957
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
If there's anything that listens for KEY_POWER it will likely shut down or
suspend the host. Since it doesn't matter whether we're really testing for
KEY_POWER or just any other key, let's just switch it and avoid one headache.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Having the system suspend or shutdown halfway through a test run is a tad
annoying. So let's talk to logind and tell it to inhibit the various keys
we're testing.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104720
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
On the very first event, the last_motion_time set by tp_begin_touch is not yet
set because we are called before the pressure-based touch detection takes
effect. And any event timestamp is more than 80ms after a zero timestamp,
causing the hysteresis to always be disabled.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98839#c74
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
When running the test suite in full fork mode, the error messages are in the
quite verbose output and searching for them is annoying. Work around this by
opening a pipe to each subprocess and writing the failed test cases to that
pipe. When all tests have finished, print the messages to stdout. This way the
failures are always the last thing printed by the test suite.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Some pens keep sending small amounts of pressure even when the tip is up. This
isn't always a sign of the pens worn out, it also happens on the new Pro Pen
3D models.
The X driver uses a default threshould of ~1.3% to paper over this, let's do
the same with a 1% threshold. This threshold only applies to pens that don't
already have a pressure offset anyway.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103086
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Commit db3b6fe5f7 "fallback: change to handle the state at EV_SYN time"
introduced regressions for two types of event sequences.
One is a kernel bug - some devices/drivers like the asus-wireless send a key
press + release within the same event frame which now cancels out and
disappears into the ether. This should be fixed in the kernel drivers but
there appear to be enough of them that we can't just pretend it's an outlier.
The second issue is a libinput bug. If we get two key events in the same frame
(e.g. shift + A) we update the state correctly but the events are sent in the
order of the event codes. KEY_A sorts before KEY_LEFTSHIFT and our shift + A
becomes A + shift.
Fix this by treating key events as before db3b6fe5f7 - by sending them out
as we get them.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104030
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Unlike the already-existing thumb detection, a touch may be labelled palm at
any time, not just during the initial touch down. This requires full
integration into the tap state machine to unwind properly. For most states, a
palm detection simply ignores the finger and reverts to the most recent state.
One exception is the case of two fingers down, one finger up followed by the
remaining finger detected as a palm finger. This triggers a single-finger tap
but with timestamps that may be from the wrong finger. Since we're within a
short tap timeout anyway this should not matter too much.
The special state PALM_UP is only handled in one condition (DEAD). Once a
touch is a palm we basically skip over it from then on. If we end up in the
DEAD state after a button press we still need to handle the palm up events
accordingly to be able to return to IDLE. That transition also requires us to
have an accurate count of the real fingers down (palms don't count) so we need
a separate nfingers_down counter for tapping.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103210
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
8cf6893 removed it to make search/replace easier, restore it for the tests
where we don't want debouncing to automatically be handled.
Still left in place are the various top software button cases. Because of the
button re-routing through the fallback interface we need those to be
debounced.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The current debouncing code monitors events and switches on when events are
too close together. From then on, any event can be delayed.
Vicente Bergas provided an algorithm that avoids most of these delays:
on a button state change we now forward the change without delay but start a
timer. If the button changes state during that timer, the changes are
ignored. On timer expiry, events are sent to match the hardware state
with the client's view of the device. This is only done if needed.
Thus, a press-release sequence of: PRP sends a single press event, a sequence of
PRPR sends press and then the release at the end of the timeout. The timeout
is short enough that the delay should not be noticeable.
This new mode is called the 'bounce' mode. The old mode is now referred to as
'spurious' mode and only covers the case of a button held down that loses
contact. It works as before, monitoring a button for these spurious contact
losses and switching on. When on, button release events are delayed as before.
The whole button debouncing moves to a state machine which makes debugging a
lot easier. See the accompanying SVG for the diagram.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is via a simple search & replace. Later auditing is needed to switch
clicks that should not be debounced (e.g. touchpads) back to a non-debounced
version.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Getting spurious test case failures in these two tests but they're not easily
reproducible. One cause may be a slight delay of the event that we're writing
to the kernel device. If that has a minor delay, we'll miss it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
needed for the razer blade keybard which provides multiple event nodes for
one physical device but it's hard/impossible to identify which one is the real
event node we care about.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103156
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Touchpads that require the hysteresis do not have filtering in the firmware
and holding a finger still causes continuous cursor movements. This implies
that we get a continuous stream of events with motion data.
If the finger is on the touchpad but we don't see any motion, the finger is
stationary and the touchpad firmware does filtering. In that case, we don't
need to add a hysteresis on top.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98839
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Once the lid is closed, the keyboard event listener is set up to open the lid
for us on keyboard events. With the right sequence, we can trigger the
listener to be added to the list multiple times, triggering an assert in the
list test code (or an infinite loop in the 1.8 branch).
Conditions:
* SW_LID value 1 - sets up the keyboard listener
* keyboard event - sets lid_is_closed to false
* SW_LID value 0 - is ignored because we're already open
* SW_LID value 1 - sets up the keyboard listener again
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103298
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Our own reference may be the last one that's still alive if the context is
currently suspended (litest_suspend()). If we unref before removing it from
the path interface, we access already freed memory.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
We don't rely that the lid switch doesn't work in this test, but we always
print a few things when a device gets successfully added.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
When running with -j 1 and CK_FORK=no, the log_handler_count is shared between
the tests. The log_priority tests can invoke the log handler during
libinput_unref(), so on the next day the log handler starts with a nonzero log
handler.
Fix this by always initializing it to 0 in the tests we expect it to be zero
and resetting it last.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
