Where the server connects a device after the client has already removed it, we
need to ignore that message silently.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This was already spelled out in the documentation but just not yet
implemented. New starting state for any device added by EIS is "suspended",
the server needs to explicitly resume it before events are accepted.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This function dispatches until a stable state is reached - that could be no
event waiting or some event waiting to be processed.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We can remove those when we have a working implementation, for now it's too
painful to debug when an exchange doesn't work for some reason.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Makes it easier to distinguish between ei and eis when everything in the tests
is just printed to stderr anyway.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
SOCK_DGRAM gives us free message framing but the sockets we'll likely deal
with (or at least *have* to handle) are stream. This was a leftover anyway
from some debug testing.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is a more explicit API that makes it more obvious where the ref/unref
calls need to go. The sink now has two refs to the sources as well (epoll data
pointer and the list) which means a caller cannot just source_unref() anymore
without removing a source. Since this is how we've been using it anyway - meh.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We don't want valgrind to complain about leaks when we only handle a portion
of the events on the socket.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
That's what copy/pasting does... this argument is the user_data pointer which
we don't care about here.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Similar in style to Rust where the unit tests are in the same file. Let's see
how far we can get with that in C. Auto-discovery of tests by forcing the
respective suites into a special test section so we can collect it later from
our unit runner.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
