Incoming device events are now added to a device-internal queue. Once
the frame event comes in, that queue is shuffled over to the main event
queue. For libei/the EIS implementation this means that device events
are seen only once the frame event appears from the sender (or it is
emulated by other means).
Currently only implemented for frame events, the vague plan for the
future is to merely queue the device events internally and "release"
them once a frame event was received, retrofitting the timestamp to the
C event struct (i.e. making ei_event_get_time() available on all device
events).
Meanwhile, the frame event it is.
Where the sender sends empty frame events, or a device event without a
subsequent frame events ensure that event is filtered or emulated in our
event queue.
Note: because of our sender filters, we cannot actually test
this, at least not easily. Let's hope it works.
We only need frame events after device events (pointer, touch,
keyboard). In some cases, the library prevents an event from being
written to the wire, e.g. if the coordinates are out of region, but the
client will still call ei_device_frame() for that now-filtered event.
Keep a boolean to remember if we have sent something that requires a
frame event and filter accordingly.
Note that this currently filters the *sender* side only, not the
receiver side. A sender that gets an empty frame event onto the wire
will still get that into the other side.
This also doesn't handle the flushing of frame events before other
events, ideally we should enforce a frame event before e.g. stop
emulating.
Destroying a touch causes ei_touch_up if the touch is still down. But
for the event sequence to be correct we also need to add a frame event
here, otherwise the touch up may be "pending" on the remote until the
next actual event happens and a frame is added.
A client that doesn't want this should just call ei_touch_up()
Creates the socket and adds it; is intended to be used to create client
connections that are passed via a secure channel, e.g. via portals.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
With passive libei contexts receiving events sent by the EIS
implementation, the type of device changes significantly. While a
relative input device could still send data in logical pixels,
absolute devices may not have that luxury.
Best example here is an external tablet (think: Wacom Intuos): that
tablet has no built-in mapping to a screen and thus cannot capture input
events in logical pixels.
Address this by adding a device type, either virtual or physical.
In terms of functionality, the device's type decides:
- only virtual devices have regions
- only physical devices have a size
The event API remains as-is but the event data not represents either
logical pixels (virtual devices) or mm (physical device).
An EIS implementation connected to a passive libei context would likely
create:
- a virtual relative device (sending deltas in logical pixels)
- one or more physical absolute devices (sending deltas in mm)
Previously, a client could only bind to a capability immediately after
SEAT_ADDED and with a rather awkward API to confirm the capabilities.
Change this to allow for dynamic binding of capabilities, i.e. a client
calls ei_bind_capability() or ei_unbind_capability() whenever it feels
like, causing the respective devices of this capabilty to be added or
removed.
This allows for clients that are temporarily disinterested in a
capability but may require said capability later.
The default function takes one capability, a helper for enable/disable
multiple capabilities in one go is provided as well. On the protocol,
only the "bind" request exists which always represents the currently
wanted set of capabilities.
Note that the helper functions for multiple capabilities require NULL
(not zero) as sentinel, thanks to gcc.
This is a leftover from an earlier implementation that didn't get
removed in time. This extends to a macro that was using the context flag
(rather than the client flag) and in turn caused a bunch of false
positives on the tests.
This way eis_seat_has_capability() returns the effective capabilities
the server can actually use - no point creating touch devices when the
client has not confirmed that.
In theory we should have a eis_seat_get_effective_capabilities() to
differ between configured and effective capabilities, but I'm having a
hard time thinking of a use-case where the implementation forgets
which caps it enabled.
The side-effect of this patch is that adding a device without
capabilities requested by the client now produces warning.
Our API requires a client to know which capability to pass into the
drop_capabilities function. This doesn't work for capabilities newer
than the client's version so they do not get disabled. The client will
thus receive devices it didn't ask for and doesn't know how to handle.
Let's invert the requirement and require the caller to confirm the
capabilities it wants - all others are dropped.
This is an API break but also requires updates of all clients, the
previous simple case of just calling ei_seat_bind() will now result in
zero capabilities.
A libei context can be initialized as active or passive context -
an "active" context sends events, a "passive" context receives events.
The EIS context supports both simultaneously, it is up to the
implementation to disconnect libei clients that it does not want to
suppport.
For example, the xdotool use-case creates an active libei context. The
EIS implementation controls and sets up the devices, but libei
sends the events.
In an input-capturing use-case, the EIS implementation controls
and sets up the devices **and** sends the events. libei is merely the
receiver for any event, it cannot send events. Thus this use-case
requires a passive libei context.
Most of this code is copy/paste with minor modifications - libei already
had the code to send events, libeis had the code to receive events, so
the vast majority of this patch is copying the code into the respective
other library, swap "ei" and "eis" and then apply the various minor
modifications needed to hook into the existing library.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
One macro that also defines the cleanup function, one macro that only
defines the unref. This is required for any place where we want to
use cleanup from multiple source files - like the test suite.
