One level of pointer indirection too many when passing the arguments to
dbus_message_append_args().
Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100568
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
This makes life easier for frameworks like LAVA that screen-scrape
test results.
g_test_message() is not displayed by default, but each test can be run
with either --tap or --verbose to get these messages displayed.
Reviewed-by: Philip Withnall <philip.withnall@collabora.co.uk>
Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89846
This is for g_close(), which the next commit will use. It also lets us
rely on g_type_init() being a no-op (since 2.32 the type system is
always initialized by a global constructor).
Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88810
Reviewed-by: Philip Withnall
We only use dbus-glib for its main loop; within dbus, DBusLoop is
available as an alternative, although it isn't thread-safe and
isn't public API.
For tests that otherwise only use libdbus public API, it's desirable to
be able to avoid DBusLoop, so we can run them against an installed
libdbus as an integration test. However, if we don't have dbus-glib,
we're going to have to use an in-tree main loop, which might as well
be DBusLoop.
The major disadvantage of using dbus-glib is that it isn't safe to
link both dbus-1 and dbus-internal at the same time. This is awkward
for a future test case that wants to use _dbus_getsid() in dbus-daemon.c,
but only on Windows (fd.o #54445). If we use the same API wrapper around
both dbus-glib and DBusLoop, we can compile that test against dbus-glib
or against DBusLoop, depending on the platform.
Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68852
Reviewed-by: Ralf Habacker <ralf.habacker@freenet.de>
GSocket takes responsibility for closing the fd, and there doesn't
seem to be any way to tell it not to. When this test is adapted to run
under DBusLoop as an alternative to dbus-glib, that becomes a problem,
because DBusLoop/DBusSocketSetEpoll do not tolerate that. Work around it.
Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68852
Reviewed-by: Ralf Habacker <ralf.habacker@freenet.de>
We don't really need g_socket_send_with_blocking here.
Also, don't leak the GLib socket objects.
Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41219
Reviewed-by: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
