Becuase there's only one 'flags' property for WEP keys (because it's pretty
dumb to have different flags for all 4 WEP keys) we need to do some tap dancing
with the secret name, so that requests for "wep-keyX" look up the "wep-key-flags"
property.
Duh, AND-ing flags with 0 (which is NM_SETTING_SECRET_FLAG_SYSTEM_OWNED)
is always going to be FALSE... NM_SETTING_SECRET_FLAG_SYSTEM_OWNED is
special; because it's the default value if the key isn't present,
and at this point it's exclusive of all other flags. So (at least for
now) it's OK that it's 0 but we might want to change it later so that
NM_SETTING_SECRET_FLAG_SYSTEM_OWNED can actually be used as a flag.
This allows the necessary flexibility when handling secrets; otherwise
it wouldn't be known when NM should save secrets returned from agents
to backing storage, or when the agents should store the secrets. We
can't simply use lack of a secret in persistent storage as the indicator
of this, as (for example) when creating a new connection without
secrets the storage method would be abmiguous.
At the same time, fold in "always ask" functionality for OTP tokens
so user agents don't have to store that attribute themselves out-of-band.
There was never a property for it anyway, so it never got serialized
across D-Bus, because it was folded into the "password" property in
wpa_supplicant between 0.5 and 0.6.
It's the thing that owns the secrets anyway, and it simplifies things to
have the secrets handling there instead of half in NMActRequest and
half in NMManager. It also means we can get rid of the ugly signals
that NMSettingsConnection had to emit to get agent's secrets, and
we can consolidate the requests for the persistent secrets that the
NMSettingsConnection owned into NMSettingsConnection itself instead
of also in NMAgentManager.
Since the NMActRequest and the NMVPNConnection classes already tracked
the underlying NMSettingsConnection representing the activation, its
trivial to just have them ask the NMSettingsConnection for secrets
instead of talking to the NMAgentManager. Thus, only the
NMSettingsConnection now has to know about the agent manager, and it
presents a cleaner interface to other objects further up the chain,
instead of having bits of the secrets request splattered around the
activation request, the VPN connection, the NMManager, etc.
The first-level hash table key should be the setting name itself,
not the GType name of the setting's GObject. There's probably a
better way to do this to reduce that confusion.
When a user makes an explicit request for secrets via GetSecrets
or activates a device, don't ask other users' agents for secrets.
Restrict secrets request to agents owned by the user that made the
initial activate or GetSecrets request.
Automatic activations still request secrets from any available agent.
A client calling GetSecrets on the connection should also request
secrets from agents in that client's session. ie, a connection
editor should be able to call GetSecrets, and get the secrets
stored by the agent in that session (the applet).
Simplifies code internally, and makes it easier for clients as well in
some cases where they want to control what ends up in the resulting
hash and what does not.
The Settings.Connection interface is now only provided by NetworkManager
itself since there is only one settings service. NM can validate
requests for secrets internally and thus there's no need to lock down
GetSecrets using a separate D-Bus interface, since PolicyKit provides
that functionality on systems where this is desirable (ie multi-user).
Single-user systems that do not have PolicyKit will inherently trust
the user already, or if not D-Bus auth is flexible enough to lock
down the GetSecrets method individually even if it's not on a separate
D-Bus interface.
Second, since only clients like connection editors or applets will be
calling the GetSecrets method, there's no need for 'hints' or
'request_new' arguments here since this method should never trigger
an interactive secrets request. Only NM should send those requests
when it knows it needs to ask the user, either during connection or
after validating the incoming GetSecrets request. A connection editor
type application should never be able to trigger the normal
"What's your passphrase" dialog thats provided by the secret agent
for that user's session.
Due to limitations in dbus-glib, where one GObject cannot have more
than one introspection XML object attached to it, we used to include
more than one <interface> in the VPNConnection object introspection
XML. This was suboptimal for two reasons:
1) it duplicated the Connection.Active introspection XML which
made it harder for clients to use the introspection data in a
dynamic fashion, besides looking ugly in the docs
2) not many other programs use this feature of dbus-glib, which
means it didn't get a lot of testing, and broke, which sucks
for NM.
To fix this issue, create a base class for NMVpnConnection that
handles the Connection.Active API, and make NMVpnConnection itself
handle just the VPN pieces that it layers on top. This makes
dbus-glib happy because we aren't using two <interface> blocks
in the same introspection XML, and it makes the NM code more
robust because we can re-use the existing Connection.Active
introspection XML in the NMVpnConnectionBase class.
Add the necessary annotations (the mininum required, that is those
on return values. NULL parameters or container types may require
more), and the Autotools stuff to get a NetworkManager GIR for
libnm-util and a NMClient for libnm-glib.
If a pointer to a valid GError was not passed the function could
crash. Make it simpler and fix the possible crash by just converting
to hash table iters instead.
The current agent isn't in the 'pending' list, so don't check
the list for the agent and bail if it's not found since that
won't handle the current agent going away.
If NM asks for secrets, and then a client calls ActivateDevice on
that same connection, the secrets tries counter doesn't get reset
and NM then thinks we need completely new secrets when we really
don't since the old secrets request isn't valid anymore.
Also ensure the secrets tries gets reset on success and failure
to match behavior of wifi.
If NM asks for secrets, and then a client calls ActivateDevice on
that same connection, the secrets tries counter doesn't get reset
and NM then thinks we need completely new secrets when we really
don't since the old secrets request isn't valid anymore.
Found by Evan Broder
