As one of the arguments in unsigned, the calculation is performed as
unsigned integers. That can actually lead to the wrong result. Fix it by
casting to the right (signed) types.
When we (for example) receive a DHCP lease, we track the routes that
should be configured via NMPlatformIP[46]Route instances. Thus, this
structure does not only track the routes that are configured (and
cached in NMPlatform), but it is also used to track the routes that
we want to configure.
This is also the case with the "rt_source" field, which represents the
NMIPConfigSource enum for routes that we want to configure, but
for routes in the cache it corresponds to rtm_protocol.
Note that NMDhcpClient creates NMIP4Config instances, which tracks the
routes as NMPlatformIP4Route instances. Previously, NMDhcpClient didn't
have any way to leave the table/metric undecided, but this information
isn't part of the DHCP lease tself. Instead, NMDevice knows the table/metric
to use. This has various problems:
- NMDhcpClient needs to know the table/metric, for no other purpose
than to set the value when creating the NMIP4Config instance for the
lease. We first pass the information down, only so that it can be
returned with the lease information.
- during reapply or when connectivity check changes, the effectively
used table/metric can change. Previously, we would have to
re-generate the NMIP4Config instances.
Improve that by allowing to leave the table/metric undecided. Higher
layers can decide the effective metric to use.
Run:
./contrib/scripts/nm-code-format.sh -i
./contrib/scripts/nm-code-format.sh -i
Yes, it needs to run twice because the first run doesn't yet produce the
final result.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Cardace <acardace@redhat.com>
nm_utils_inet4_ntop() is public API of libnm. Also, it accepts a
%NULL buffer to use a static buffer. That is error prone and we
should not use such convenience behavior for our own code.
The kernel of Ubuntu 16.04 doesn't support IFLA_BR_VLAN_STATS_ENABLED.
If we want to run on such old kernels (which we probably do), we need to
detect that, and act accordingly.
Add nm_platform_kernel_support_get_full() to allow fetching the support
state without setting it to the compile time default.
Also, use g_atomic_int_get() to access _nm_platform_kernel_support_state
values. We should not access static variables without synchronization.
Better get it correct in any case than fast.
Older kernels may not support or send all bridge options in the netlink
message. In case the parameter is missing, set the default value.
Note that there may be future cases where we need to encode whether
the option is present or not. Currently we don't express that.
Older versions of iproute2 (Ubuntu 16.04) don't support all the requested
bridge options. We need to gracefully ignore a failure and try with our
own implementation.
While doing that, only set the command line arguments if they are
necessary (that is, if they requested value is not the default already).
Luckily, Ubuntu 16.04's kernel supports these properties just fine, so
we can avoid complicated compatibility code to cope with missing kernel
support. It's really just an iproute2 limitation and affects only the
tests.
This makes the macro more function like. Also, taking a pointer
makes it a bit clearer that this possibly changes the value.
Of course, it's not a big difference to before, but this
form seems slightly preferable to me.
This parameter really affects whether a candidate in @addresses_prune will be
considered or not. Since we already construct the prune list separately, this
parameter is at the wrong place.
This requires us to re-implement nm_platform_lookup_clone(). While the
function has a predicate callback that we could use for this purpose,
I will later add a separate predicate argument to
nm_platform_ip_address_get_prune_list(). When that happens, it would
be cumbersome to chain the two function pointers. Instead, reimplement
nm_platform_lookup_clone().
Follow the pattern of nm_platform_ip_route_sync(), which also accepts
the list of addresses that are potential candidates for removal.
This allows the caller to carefully construct the list of addresses
which are possibly removed, so that sync (possibly) only adds new
addresses.
It is beneficial to have both address families side by side.
A lot of operations are exactly the same, so it's preferable to see
that. Especially in the cases where they differ, it's preferable to see
how they differ (and why).
