From 935ab4262a76fbf46b188e8a5aa3dc5b229b2272 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeremy Huddleston Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:25:31 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mi: Actually, we don't need to lock at all in mieqProcessInputEvents... (cherry picked from commit 3b55803615bbce3a9a3d6b6747734f6735c0307c) --- mi/mieq.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/mi/mieq.c b/mi/mieq.c index 8a1010fe6..f7427d95b 100644 --- a/mi/mieq.c +++ b/mi/mieq.c @@ -236,10 +236,6 @@ mieqProcessInputEvents(void) int x = 0, y = 0; DeviceIntPtr dev = NULL; -#ifdef XQUARTZ - pthread_mutex_lock(&miEventQueueMutex); -#endif - while (miEventQueue.head != miEventQueue.tail) { if (screenIsSaved == SCREEN_SAVER_ON) dixSaveScreens (serverClient, SCREEN_SAVER_OFF, ScreenSaverReset); @@ -254,10 +250,6 @@ mieqProcessInputEvents(void) memcpy(&e, &miEventQueue.events[miEventQueue.head], sizeof(EventRec)); miEventQueue.head = (miEventQueue.head + 1) % QUEUE_SIZE; -#ifdef XQUARTZ - pthread_mutex_unlock(&miEventQueueMutex); -#endif - if (miEventQueue.handlers[e.event[0].u.u.type]) { /* If someone's registered a custom event handler, let them * steal it. */