This allows for Lua test scripts to be grouped into a label. So that they can be
treated different in terms of the init infrastructure that the script-tester
lays out for those tests.
* Remove entirely the hook priority numbers and use before/after dependencies
* Split the WpEvent code out of WpEventDispatcher
* Add methods on WpEvent to interface with it from the WpEventDispatcher.
As a bonus, we can now also implement tooling to inspect which hooks would
in theory run for an event and write tests around that
* Removed some internal debugging facilities and log calls, will redo it later.
* Using spa_list now for the list of hooks, to reduce the number of allocations
happening in the "hook collection" algorithm
* Switched some internal data to use g_new0 instead of g_slice_new0
* Added g_free to free WpEvent structures... surprisingly, we were leaking them
before
After the creation of metadata with config data, m-settings will also need to
trigger the init of WpSettings Object/API. Earlier this was done in main.c as
part of init transition but the logic there is much more generalized now and so
it has been moved here.
The callback for the last test was getting called with non-string type and this
fails the test. fix it by sending string in correct format.
This test failure was not failing the "make test" this is known limitation in the test
setup. The limitation here is only with the last assert statement.
- WirePlumber Lua now facilitates Lua libraries/modules, utilize this and create
modules. Add some tests around this functionality.
- Create policy-hooks.lua containing all the hooks to find-target events
- Create policy-utils.lua module and push all the policy utility functions to it.
- Create common-utils.lua module and push the common utility functions to it.
- Remove all the above functionality from policy-node.lua and clean it up.
after-events hooks are instantiated with rescan event, not with the event which
actually triggered it. after-events-with-event fills this gap.
policy-node clean needed this kind of hooks.
They is really no needed with the new _get() API and the WpSpaJson API. In C,
users can use 'wp_spa_json_parse_{boolean|int|float|string}()' APIs to parse the
WpSpaJson. In Lua, users can just do 'Settings.get(setting, m):parse()'.
We need to use WpSpaJson to parse the values in WpSettings. This is because the
wireplumber configuration is written in JSON, so WpSettings should only hold
JSON values. To fix this, 2 API changes have been done:
- wp_settings_get_int() only accepts gint values, instead of gint64 values. This
is because the WpSpaJson API only parses int values, like spa_json_parse_int().
- wp_settings_get_string() now returns a newly allocated string, this is because
the string needs to be decoded in case it has quotes.
after-events hooks will get the original event triggering it, instead of the
rescan event.
after-events hook can register with any event, but it is called with rescan event
info. This is so because, after-events hook run after all the on-events hooks
are done with and as a part of the rescan event. so it is triggered with rescan
event data, which doesnt carry much info, instead of rescan event, it makes more
sense to call the after-events hook with the original event which triggered it.
- Add a new variable "name" in WpEventHook and use it to log all the
hooks(by name) picked up in _push_event(). This gives a clear picture
if hook is registered for a given event.
- Form a name for an event and a chain of events for an event run, log
both of them. This gives a clear picture of the events executed and
order in which they are dispatched.
- Similarly build hooks chain and print it in _source_dispatch(), this
gives a clear picture of the hooks picked and the order in which they
are dispatched.
- Log only the dispatchable(with hooks) events, this de-clutters
the log messages.
- Monitor to use the JSON APIs and move away from config/lua
- Enhance logic in wpsettings to parse settings which are JSON arrays,
some of the bluetooth properties are JSON arrays and parsing
logic confused them for a rule.
- Add corresponding tests around this logic as well.
- add integer and string version of the APIs,
- Also Refine the APIs, return value to indicate the setting existance
and a new param to return the value of the setting.
- add their lua bindings as well, in lua binding the return value nil
indicates that the setting is not defnied.
- Add corresponding C and lua tests as well.
- Add a few handy debug msgs.
- unlike pipewire, rules will be parsed during the bootup time, i.e
during the creation of the wpsettings object.
- The rules are parsed into the wpinterest objects and stored in the
wpsettings object, they will be eventually used to service the
apply_rule() API.
- Support pipewire syntax of rules defination in this version.
