Move the call to assign an output from weston_surface_configure() to
weston_surface_update_transform().
As update_transform takes new geometry into use, it should also reassign
the output for the surface, but only if an output was already assigned.
Add explicit assing output calls to where we relied on
weston_surface_configure() unconditionally assigning the output.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>
When a transformed (rotated) surface is continuously resized from its
top-left corner, its location will drift. This is due to accumulating
rounding errors in transforming an offset from surface-local to global
coordinates in surface_attach().
Diminish the drift down to unobservable level by changing the
weston_surface global position from integer to float.
The offset transformation is now done without rounding. To preserve the
precision, wl_shell::configure() interface must use floats, and so does
weston_surface_configure(), too.
The con of this patch is that it adds inconsistency to the surface
position coordinates: sometimes they are floats, sometimes integers.
weston_surface::transform.position depends on x,y, and therefore the
dirty flag, so move x and y into geometry.
Also add the missing dirty flags.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>
This collided with the big weston rename, but git did a good job of fixing
most cases.
Conflicts:
compositor/compositor.h
src/compositor-x11.c
src/compositor.c
src/screenshooter.c
src/util.c
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
