v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
ir_triop_bitfield_extract is a little weird because the second and third
operand and aways int, so they may differ in type from the first
operand.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
The code generated is quite different from what was previously used. I
believe that it is still correct by the GLSL spec, and I believe, due to
C rules about shifts, the behavior will be the same.
Section 5.9 (Expressions) of the GLSL 4.50 spec says:
The result is undefined if the right operand is negative, or greater
than or equal to the number of bits in the left expression's base
type.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
ldexp is weird because its two operands have different types. Add
support for directly specifying the exact signatures of all the possible
variations of an operation.
v2: Use tuple() instead of () for clarity. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
These are operations like the pack functions that have separate
functions that assign multiple outputs from a single input.
v2: Correct the source and destination types. They were previously
transposed.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
Only operations where the implementation is identical code regardless of
type. The only such operations are ir_binop_all_equal and
ir_binop_any_nequal.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: Remove extra int() cast in find_lsb. Suggested by Matt. 'for (a,
b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
ir_unop_i2b is omitted because its source can either be int or uint.
That makes it special.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
Unary operations where all of the supported types use the same C
expression to evaluate them.
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
This makes things a little more clear now, and it will make future
changes... possible.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
This hasn't been true since we added support for GLSL 1.30.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
The comments and whitespace can live in the Python code.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
The operator_string functions gave us some protection against a
malformed table. Now that the table is generated from the same data
that generates the enum, this is not a concern. Just cut out the middle
man.
text data bss dec hex filename
7531892 273992 28584 7834468 778b64 i965_dri-64bit-before.so
7531828 273992 28584 7834404 778b24 i965_dri-64bit-after.so
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
'diff -ud' is clean.
v2: Massive rebase.
v3: With much help from José Fonseca, fix the SCons build.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
This ensures that they remain correct if the list is rearranged or new
opcodes are added. I checked a diff of before and after to ensure that
each ir_last_ had the same value.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
There are differences in where end-of-line comments are placed, but
'diff -wud' is clean.
v2: Massive rebase.
v3: With much help from José Fonseca, fix SCons build.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
