Imported buffers may be created in a device with different
memory alignment and this can cause vm bind to fail because bo
size can be smaller than the calculated vm bind range using the
importer device memory alignment.
So here adding actual_size to anv_bo, this will be set with the actual
size of the bo allocated by kmd for bos allocate in the current device.
For other bo the lseek or the Vulkan API size will be used.
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/22219>
This also need to be executed in Xe kmd, so moving it to a function.
No changes in behavior intended here.
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/22171>
We want to use this for submission of traces outside command buffers,
so it won't just execute copies of timestamp buffers.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Emma Anholt <emma@anholt.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/22006>
Not using it yet, that will be done in the next patch.
Xe only supports submission using VM.
For i915 the backend functions are just a noop.
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/21698>
Functions that are in hot paths will have a different treatment to
support i915 and Xe KMD.
Each KMD will have an anv_kmd_backend that will have the hot path
functions set, this way we can avoid branch prediction misses.
Other functions will gradually be moved to anv_kmd_backend.
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/20948>
The anv_execbuf_add_bo() function already sets the offsets for the
exec_objects. Since we're always using softpin and never using
relocations all these objects should have non-changing offsets, all
set during anv_bo creation and never changed. Not only we should not
change these offsets, we definitely don't change them between
anv_execbuf_add_bo() and this loop we're removing.
Previously, we'd have the offset set as -1 for BOs that had never been
submitted when we were not using softpin.
Notice that with games we can have several hundreds of BOs in this
array.
This loop was added by:
c5f7e1f5b4 ("anv: Delete relocation support from batch submission")
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/20885>
Three reasons for that:
0. The operation we're doing here is actually a reallocation.
1. The newer code is, IMHO, easier to read.
2. Realloc has this property where sometimes, when possible, it will
expand your array without moving it somewhere else, so it doesn't
need to copy the memory contents, returning the original pointer
back to you. I did some analysis and while that case is not common,
it does happen sometimes in real world applications (I could see it
happening in Shootergame and Aztec Ruins, but not Dota 2), so we're
able to save a few CPU cycles.
v2: Rebase.
Reviewed-by: Ivan Briano <ivan.briano@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/20703>
Because this is counting the array length of the things related to the
BOs, just like syncobj_array_length is counting the array length of
the things related to syncobjs.
v2: Rebase.
Reviewed-by: Ivan Briano <ivan.briano@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/20703>
This is the only code path where we don't run anv_execbuf_finish() in
case anv_execbuf_add_bo() fails. While there is not a bug in the
current tree, I recently made an (uncommitted) modification that
started leaking memory and made me realize the lack of cleanup here.
If we had anv_execbuf_finish() being called upon error like we're
going to have after this patch my modification wouldn't have caused
the memory leak.
I think it's much safer and future-proof if we're able to operate
under the assumption that whatever is allocated and set to anv_execbuf
will be dealt with upon failure of anything else related to it, so
functions that fail should only be required to free pointers not yet
assigned to anv_execbuf.
The dEQP-VK 'alloc_callback_fail' tests should exercise this code
path. The one I was specifically using here is:
dEQP-VK.api.object_management.alloc_callback_fail.device_group
v2: Rebase.
Reviewed-by: Ivan Briano <ivan.briano@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/20703>
Because anv_execbuf_add_bo_bitset() calls anv_execbuf_add_bo(), which
can fail if its memory allocations fail.
I have seen dEQP tests exercising memory allocation failures during
anv_execbuf_add_bo(), but I don't think the path coming from
add_bo_biset() was specifically exercised. Anyway, add the error check
just in case.
v2: Rebase.
Cc: mesa-stable
Reviewed-by: Ivan Briano <ivan.briano@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/20703>
In anv_execbuf_add_syncobj(), we try to not create or use
exec->syncobj_values if we don't need to. But when we figure we're
going to need it (i.e., when timeline_value is not zero), then we
create exec->syncobj_values with vk_zalloc, which means every previous
value is set to zero, as it should be. This is all correct.
The problem starts when we add a 16th element. In this case we double
exec->syncobj_array_length and realloc the buffer by using vk_alloc
and copying the old array to the new one. After that, we write the
timeline_value to the array only if it's not zero, and that's the
problem: since we just used vkalloc and memcpy, we don't have any
guarantees that the new array will be zero after the 16th element, and
if timeline_value is zero we write nothing to that position.
Once we start using exec->syncobj_values we have to commit to using
it, so the "if (timeline_value)" check near the end of the function
has to be changed to "if (exec->syncobj_values)", so we actually set
elements after the 16th to zero when they need to be zero. Another
approach to fix this would be to memset the new elements once we
double syncobj_array_length.
In practice, I couldn't find any application or deqp test that used
more than 3 elements in exec->syncobj_array_length, and we need more
than 16 elements in order to be able to reproduce the bug, so I'm not
aware of any real-world bug that goes away with this patch. This issue
was found while reading code.
If we craft a little Vulkan program that submits a ton of timeline and
binary semaphores on vkQueueSubmit, then waits for them, we get the
following error without this patch:
MESA: error: ../../src/intel/vulkan/anv_batch_chain.c:1910: execbuf2 failed: Invalid argument (VK_ERROR_DEVICE_LOST)
v2: Rebase.
Cc: mesa-stable
Reviewed-by: Ivan Briano <ivan.briano@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/20703>
There is no change in behavior here.
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rohan Garg <rohan.garg@intel.com>
Acked-by: Marcin Ślusarz <marcin.slusarz@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/20428>
More code re-organization to separate i915_drm.h specific code from
the rest.
No behavior changes here.
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rohan Garg <rohan.garg@intel.com>
Acked-by: Marcin Ślusarz <marcin.slusarz@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/20428>
