The difference between these two templates were mostly an artefact of
the development of the original patch series and to minimize the
differences between the original code and the generated code.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
ir_triop_bitfield_extract is a little weird because the second and third
operand and aways int, so they may differ in type from the first
operand.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
The code generated is quite different from what was previously used. I
believe that it is still correct by the GLSL spec, and I believe, due to
C rules about shifts, the behavior will be the same.
Section 5.9 (Expressions) of the GLSL 4.50 spec says:
The result is undefined if the right operand is negative, or greater
than or equal to the number of bits in the left expression's base
type.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
ldexp is weird because its two operands have different types. Add
support for directly specifying the exact signatures of all the possible
variations of an operation.
v2: Use tuple() instead of () for clarity. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
These are operations like the pack functions that have separate
functions that assign multiple outputs from a single input.
v2: Correct the source and destination types. They were previously
transposed.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
Only operations where the implementation is identical code regardless of
type. The only such operations are ir_binop_all_equal and
ir_binop_any_nequal.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: Remove extra int() cast in find_lsb. Suggested by Matt. 'for (a,
b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
ir_unop_i2b is omitted because its source can either be int or uint.
That makes it special.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
Unary operations where all of the supported types use the same C
expression to evaluate them.
v2: 'for (a, b) in d' => 'for a, b in d'. Suggested by Dylan.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
This makes things a little more clear now, and it will make future
changes... possible.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
This hasn't been true since we added support for GLSL 1.30.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
The comments and whitespace can live in the Python code.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
The operator_string functions gave us some protection against a
malformed table. Now that the table is generated from the same data
that generates the enum, this is not a concern. Just cut out the middle
man.
text data bss dec hex filename
7531892 273992 28584 7834468 778b64 i965_dri-64bit-before.so
7531828 273992 28584 7834404 778b24 i965_dri-64bit-after.so
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
'diff -ud' is clean.
v2: Massive rebase.
v3: With much help from José Fonseca, fix the SCons build.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
This ensures that they remain correct if the list is rearranged or new
opcodes are added. I checked a diff of before and after to ensure that
each ir_last_ had the same value.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
There are differences in where end-of-line comments are placed, but
'diff -wud' is clean.
v2: Massive rebase.
v3: With much help from José Fonseca, fix SCons build.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
