It's inaccurate. Instead, see the copyright and use "git log" and
"git blame" to know the authorship.
Acked-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@amd.com>
This will allow us to use it from radv.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
There were some overlapping changes in gfx9 especially in the CB/DB
blocks which made register dumps rather misleading.
The split is along the lines of the header files, so we'll print VI-only
fields on SI and CI, for example, but we won't print GFX9 fields on
SI/CI/VI, and we won't print SI/CI/VI fields on GFX9.
Acked-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
For radv, in order to report VM faults when detected.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Similar to e09d04cd56 "radeonsi: use util_strchrnul() to fix android build error"
Android Bionic does not support strchrnul() string function,
gallium auxiliary util/u_string.h provides util_strchrnul()
This change avoids the following warning and error:
external/mesa/src/amd/common/ac_debug.c:501:15: warning: implicit declaration of function 'strchrnul' is invalid in C99
char *end = strchrnul(out, '\n');
^
external/mesa/src/amd/common/ac_debug.c:501:9: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion initializing 'char *' with an expression of type 'int'
char *end = strchrnul(out, '\n');
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning and 1 error generated.
Fixes: c2c3912410 "ac/debug: annotate IB dumps with the raw values"
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Both GFX6 and GFX9 fields are printed next to each other in parsed IBs.
The Python script parses both headers like one stream and tries to merge
all definitions.
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@amd.com>
Otherwise we read past the end of the buffer.
Signed-off-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <basni@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@amd.com>
This is for handling chained command buffers and secondary command
buffers. It doesn't handle the trace id for secondary command buffers
yet, but I don't think that is possible in general with just writes,
as we could call a secondary command buffer multiple times.
I think this is good enough for now, as the most useful case is the
chaining when we grow an IB.
Signed-off-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <basni@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
