Here is a couple of fixes for GNU/Hurd:
- dri_interface.h: no libdrm support either.
- configure.ac:
- GNU/Hurd is a GNU OS with _GNU_SOURCE and PTHREADS.
- GNU needs a couple of flags like other OSes
Signed-off-by: Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists@gmail.com>
This interface gives the driver two important features. First, it can
allocate the (fake) front-buffer only when needed. Second, it can
tell the buffer allocator the format of buffers being allocated. This
enables support for back-buffer and depth-buffer with different bits
per pixel.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@redhat.com>
As of commit 23ad86cfb9 all messages go
through output_if_debug().
Add new parameter to output_if_debug() to indicate whether to emit a newline.
_mesa_warning() and _mesa_error() calls should not end their strings with \n.
_mesa_debug() calls should end their text with \n.
Use _NEW_PROGRAM_CONSTANTS when changing constant/uniform buffer values.
Binding a new program/shader sets both _NEW_PROGRAM and _NEW_PROGRAM_CONSTANTS.
This can be almost impossible to avoid - hopefully we won't encounter
a situation where this is a true requirement. Would probably require
drivers to flush between hardware and software vertex processing.
The drm_intel_gem_bo_map_gtt() call that replaced dri_bo_map() is
producing errors like:
intel_bufmgr_gem.c:689: Error preparing buffer map 39 (vp_const_buffer): Invalid argument .
and returning NULL, causing a segfault in the memcpy().
Just reverting until we can get to the root issue...
In the VS constants can now be handled in two different ways:
1. If there's room in the GRF, put constants there. They're preloaded from
the CURBE prior to VS execution. This is the historical approach. The
problem is the GRF may not have room for all the shader's constants and
temps and misc registers. Hence...
2. Use a separate constant buffer which is read from using a READ message.
This allows a very large number of constants and frees up GRF regs for
shader temporaries. This is the new approach. May be a little slower
than 1.
1 vs. 2 is chosen according to how many constants and temps the shader needs.
The new, second cache will only be used for surface-related items.
Since we can create many surfaces the original, single cache could get
filled quickly. When we cleared it, we had to regenerate shaders, etc.
With two caches, we can avoid doing that.
