Since 2d6233d0 ("nir: Check all sizes in nir_alu_instr_is_comparison"),
nir_alu_instr_is_comparison already returns true for comparisons with 32bit
result.
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/23287>
Since 624e799cc3 ("nir: Drop nir_ssa_def::name and nir_register::name"), SSA
defs don't have names, making the name argument unused. Drop it from the
signature and fix the call sites. This was done with the help of the following
Coccinelle semantic patch:
@@
expression A, B, C, D, E;
@@
-nir_ssa_dest_init(A, B, C, D, E);
+nir_ssa_dest_init(A, B, C, D);
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Reviewed-by: Timur Kristóf <timur.kristof@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Emma Anholt <emma@anholt.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/23078>
The pattern shows up all the time open-coded. Use the macro instead.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Seurer <konstantin.seurer@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Natalie <jenatali@microsoft.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/22967>
We can now determine whether a nir_src is for an if without a sideband, so
simplify the function signature.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@collabora.com>
Suggested-by: Faith Ekstrand <faith@gfxstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Faith Ekstrand <faith.ekstrand@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/22343>
Every nir_ssa_def is part of a chain of uses, implemented with doubly linked
lists. That means each requires 2 * 64-bit = 16 bytes per def, which is
memory intensive. Together they require 32 bytes per def. Not cool.
To cut that memory use in half, we can combine the two linked lists into a
single use list that contains both regular instruction uses and if-uses. To do
this, we augment the nir_src with a boolean "is_if", and reimplement the
abstract if-uses operations on top of that list. That boolean should fit into
the padding already in nir_src so should not actually affect memory use, and in
the future we sneak it into the bottom bit of a pointer.
However, this creates a new inefficiency: now iterating over regular uses
separate from if-uses is (nominally) more expensive. It turns out virtually
every caller of nir_foreach_if_use(_safe) also calls nir_foreach_use(_safe)
immediately before, so we rewrite most of the callers to instead call a new
single `nir_foreach_use_including_if(_safe)` which predicates the logic based on
`src->is_if`. This should mitigate the performance difference.
There's a bit of churn, but this is largely a mechanical set of changes.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Faith Ekstrand <faith.ekstrand@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/22343>
Hoping that I didn't miss any, this *should* add assertions
to all functions and passes which explicitly handle 'nir_loop'.
Acked-by: Faith Ekstrand <faith.ekstrand@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/13962>
I copy-and-pasted one of these and people noted that we had a better tool,
so make sure nobody else copy and pastes it.
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/17664>
This pattern almost always gets peephole-selected out anyway, but I
noticed it once I removed glsl opt_conditional_discard.
iris shader-db:
total instructions in shared programs: 8933934 -> 8933158 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 75575 -> 74799 (-1.03%)
helped: 179
HURT: 15
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/17664>
There are several places that should have supported the various sized
versions of bcsel and the various nir_op_[fi]csel_* opcodes. Rather
than enumerate the whole list, add a property.
v2: Make the comment for NIR_OP_IS_SELECTION more descriptive.
Suggested by Jason.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/17048>
This optimizations turns
loop {
...
if (cond1) {
if (cond2) {
do_work_1();
break;
} else {
do_work_2();
}
do_work_3();
break;
} else {
...
}
}
into:
loop {
...
if (cond1) {
if (cond2) {
do_work_1();
} else {
do_work_2();
do_work_3();
}
break;
} else {
...
}
}
As this optimizations moves code into the NIF statement,
it re-iterates on the branch legs in case of success.
Reviewed-by: Emma Anholt <emma@anholt.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/7587>
We say that they're for debug only but we don't really have a good
policy around when to set them and when not to. In particular,
nir_lower_system_values and nir_lower_vars_to_ssa which are the chief
producers of SSA values which might reasonably have a name do not bother
to set one. We have some names set from things like BLORP and RADV's
meta shaders but AFAICT, they're setting a name more because it's there
than because they actually care.
Also, most things other than nir_clone and nir_serialize don't bother to
try and preserve them. You can see in the diffstat of this commit
exactly what passes attempt to preserve names. Notably missing from the
list is opt_algebraic which is the single largest source of SSA def
churn and it happily throws names away.
These observations lead me to question whether or not names are actually
useful at all or if they're just taking up space (8B per instruction)
and wasting CPU cycles (to ralloc_strdup on the off chance we do have
one). I don't think I can think of a single time in recent history
where I've been debugging a shader issue and a SSA value name has been
there and been useful. If anything, the few times they are there, they
just throw me off because they mess up the indentation in nir_print.
iris shader-db on my system gets runtime -2.07734% +/- 1.26933% (n=5)
Reviewed-by: Emma Anholt <emma@anholt.net>
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/5439>
Some infinite loop cases were already covered by other
restrictions (e.g. if the loop had a body), but the case with a single
block in the loop body wasn't yet.
This prevents an infinite loop when optimizing the shader in
dEQP-VK.reconvergence.subgroup_uniform_control_flow_ballot.compute.nesting2.3.2
and various others reconvergence tests.
Fixes: 0881e90c09 ("nir: Split ALU instructions in loops that read phis")
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com> [v1]
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/11476>
This commit replaces the new_src parameter of nir_ssa_def_rewrite_uses()
with an SSA def, removes nir_ssa_def_rewrite_uses_ssa(), and rewrites
all the users as needed.
Reviewed-by: Rhys Perry <pendingchaos02@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@collabora.com>
Acked-By: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9383>
This throws a curious warning:
In file included from ../src/compiler/nir/nir.h:32,
from ../src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_if.c:24:
../src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_if.c: In function ‘opt_if_loop_last_continue’:
../src/compiler/glsl/list.h:415:64: warning: ‘nif’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
415 | return !exec_list_is_empty(list) ? list->tail_sentinel.prev : NULL;
| ^
What's going on here is not enough of the optimizer has run to be able
to prove that nif is always initialized. So just handle the "can't
happen" case as if it could.
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/8724>
If the only user is a trivial bcsel which in a second step
can be turned into a phi, this conversion is also worth it
even if the previous result is not undefined or constant.
Allows for some more loop unrolling or saves a few instructions.
Totals from 62 (0.04% of 139391) affected shaders (NAVI10):
SGPRs: 4976 -> 4992 (+0.32%)
VGPRs: 4408 -> 4472 (+1.45%); split: -0.45%, +1.91%
CodeSize: 453632 -> 464000 (+2.29%); split: -0.32%, +2.60%
MaxWaves: 527 -> 511 (-3.04%); split: +0.38%, -3.42%
Instrs: 84940 -> 86681 (+2.05%); split: -0.36%, +2.41%
Cycles: 11946844 -> 11783708 (-1.37%); split: -1.40%, +0.04%
VMEM: 9403 -> 10357 (+10.15%); split: +11.59%, -1.45%
SMEM: 3003 -> 3025 (+0.73%); split: +1.07%, -0.33%
VClause: 1756 -> 1997 (+13.72%); split: -0.11%, +13.84%
SClause: 2914 -> 2915 (+0.03%); split: -0.10%, +0.14%
Copies: 6426 -> 6768 (+5.32%); split: -4.14%, +9.46%
Branches: 2105 -> 2102 (-0.14%); split: -1.66%, +1.52%
PreSGPRs: 2921 -> 2909 (-0.41%); split: -0.55%, +0.14%
PreVGPRs: 4151 -> 4179 (+0.67%); split: -0.24%, +0.92%
cc: mesa-stable
Reviewed-by: Rhys Perry <pendingchaos02@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/8123>
Fixes validation error in a Dota 2 shader.
Signed-off-by: Rhys Perry <pendingchaos02@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Fixes: b031c64349 ("nir: Convert a bcsel with only phi node sources to a phi node")
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/7426>
We would've had to add yet another level of indentation, or duplicated
finding the if conditions in the next commit. Refactor this function to
use early returns like our other optimizations, so that this isn't an
issue.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6866>
A couple of these probably aren't strictly necessary but they won't
hurt. The one that's particularly tricky is a fixed-length array in
nir_search.h. However, to avoid blowing up the binary size of
nir_opt_algebraic by about 2x, we just assert that only small ops are
used.
Cc: mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Jesse Natalie <jenatali@microsoft.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6655>
Fixes a case where opt_if_merge created code like:
if (...) {
break;
loop {
...
}
}
which caused opt_peel_loop_initial_if to complain that the loop pre-header
wasn't a predecessor of the loop header. This patch prevents this
(invalid, I think) unreachable code from being created.
Signed-off-by: Rhys Perry <pendingchaos02@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri <tarceri@itsqueeze.com>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/3496
Fixes: 4d3f6cb973 ('nir: merge some basic consecutive ifs')
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6633>
It was always fneu but naming it fne causes confusion from time to time. So
lets rename it. Later we also want to add other unordered and fne, this is
a smaller preparation for that.
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6377>
Consider the following case:
if ssa_1 {
block block_2:
/* succs: block_4 */
} else {
block block_3:
...
break
/* succs: block_5 */
}
block block_4:
vec1 32 ssa_100 = phi block_2: ssa_2
After block_3 extraction and reinsertion, phi->pred becomes invalid
and isn't updated by reinsertion since it is unreachable from block_3.
Call nir_opt_remove_phis_block before moving block to eliminate single
source phis after the if.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/3282
Fixes: e3e929f8c3
Signed-off-by: Danylo Piliaiev <danylo.piliaiev@globallogic.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri <tarceri@itsqueeze.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/5945>
nir_cf_{extract,reinsert}() can't stitch a block together
if the block we are extracting ends in a jump but other jumps
nested in further ifs should be fine to move.
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4477>
The pass assumed that "Most ALU ops produce an undefined result if any
source is undef" which is completely untrue. Due to how we lower if
statements to selects and then optimize on those selects later, we
simply cannot make that assumption. In particular this pass tried to
replace an ior of undef and true, which had been generated by
optimizing a select which itself came from flattening an if statement,
to undef causing a miscompilation for a CTS test with radeonsi NIR.
We fix this by always doing what the non-undef path did, i.e. duplicate
the instruction twice. If there are cases where the instruction before
the loop can be folded away due to having an undef source, we should add
these to opt_undef instead.
The comment above the pass says that if the phi source from before the
loop is undef, and we can fold the instruction before the loop to undef,
then we can ignore sources of the original instruction that don't
dominate the block before the loop because we don't need them to create
the instruction before the loop. This is incorrect, because the
instruction at the bottom of the loop would get those sources from the
wrong loop iteration. The code never actually did what the comment said,
so we only have to update the comment to match what the pass actually
does. We also update the example to more closely match what most actual
loops look like after vtn and peephole_select.
There are no shader-db changes with i965, radeonsi NIR, or radv. With
anv and my vkpipeline-db there's only one change:
total instructions in shared programs: 14125290 -> 14125300 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 2598 -> 2608 (0.38%)
helped: 0
HURT: 1
total cycles in shared programs: 2051473437 -> 2051473397 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 36697 -> 36657 (-0.11%)
helped: 1
HURT: 0
Fixes
KHR-GL45.shader_subroutine.control_flow_and_returned_subroutine_values_used_as_subroutine_input
with radeonsi NIR.
The difference between imov and fmov has been a constant source of
confusion in NIR for years. No one really knows why we have two or when
to use one vs. the other. The real reason is that they do different
things in the presence of source and destination modifiers. However,
without modifiers (which many back-ends don't have), they are identical.
Now that we've reworked nir_lower_to_source_mods to leave one abs/neg
instruction in place rather than replacing them with imov or fmov
instructions, we don't need two different instructions at all anymore.
Reviewed-by: Kristian H. Kristensen <hoegsberg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Reviewed-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
v2: remove & operator in a couple of memsets
add some memsets
v3: fixup lima
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net> (v2)
Fixes a couple of Coverity warnings CID 1444626.
Fixes: e30804c602 ("nir/radv: remove restrictions on opt_if_loop_last_continue()")
Reviewed-by: Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli@intel.com>
When I implemented opt_if_loop_last_continue() I had restricted
this pass from moving other if-statements inside the branch opposite
the continue. At the time it was causing a bunch of spilling in
shader-db for i965.
However Samuel Pitoiset noticed that making this pass more aggressive
significantly improved the performance of Doom on RADV. Below are
the statistics he gathered.
28717 shaders in 14931 tests
Totals:
SGPRS: 1267317 -> 1267549 (0.02 %)
VGPRS: 896876 -> 895920 (-0.11 %)
Spilled SGPRs: 24701 -> 26367 (6.74 %)
Code Size: 48379452 -> 48507880 (0.27 %) bytes
Max Waves: 241159 -> 241190 (0.01 %)
Totals from affected shaders:
SGPRS: 23584 -> 23816 (0.98 %)
VGPRS: 25908 -> 24952 (-3.69 %)
Spilled SGPRs: 503 -> 2169 (331.21 %)
Code Size: 2471392 -> 2599820 (5.20 %) bytes
Max Waves: 586 -> 617 (5.29 %)
The codesize increases is related to Wolfenstein II it seems largely
due to an increase in phis rather than the existing jumps.
This gives +10% FPS with Doom on my Vega56.
Rhys Perry also benchmarked Doom on his VEGA64:
Before: 72.53 FPS
After: 80.77 FPS
v2: disable pass on non-AMD drivers
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com> (v1)
Acked-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Rather than skipping code that looked like this:
loop {
...
if (cond) {
do_work_1();
continue;
} else {
break;
}
do_work_2();
}
Previously we would turn this into:
loop {
...
if (cond) {
do_work_1();
continue;
} else {
do_work_2();
break;
}
}
This was clearly wrong. This change checks for this case and makes
sure we now leave it for nir_opt_dead_cf() to clean up.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
In opt_peel_initial_if optimization, when moving the continue list to
end of the continue block, before the jump, could happen that the
continue list itself also ends with a jump.
This would mean that we would have two jump instructions in a row: the
first one from the continue list and the second one from the contine
block.
As inserting an instruction after a jump is not allowed (and it does not
make sense, as it will not be executed), remove the jump from the
continue block and keep the one from continue list, as it will be
executed first.
CC: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
opt_split_alu_of_phi moves ALU instruction to the end of continue block.
But if the continue block ends with a jump instruction (an explicit
"continue" instruction) then the ALU must be inserted before the jump,
as it is illegal to add instructions after the jump.
CC: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Fixes: 0881e90c09 ("nir: Split ALU instructions in loops that read phis")
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
if we have something like this:
loop {
...
if x {
break;
} else {
continue;
}
}
opt_if_loop_last_continue returns true marking progress allthough nothing
changes.
Fixes: 5921a19d4b "nir: add if opt opt_if_loop_last_continue()"
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>