In the C23 standard unreachable() is now a predefined function-like
macro in <stddef.h>
See https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/+/HEAD/docs/c23.md#is-now-a-predefined-function_like-macro-in
And this causes build errors when building for C23:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
In file included from ../src/util/log.h:30,
from ../src/util/log.c:30:
../src/util/macros.h:123:9: warning: "unreachable" redefined
123 | #define unreachable(str) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../src/util/macros.h:31:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/14/include/stddef.h:456:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
456 | #define unreachable() (__builtin_unreachable ())
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
So don't redefine it with the same name, but use the name UNREACHABLE()
to also signify it's a macro.
Using a different name also makes sense because the behavior of the
macro was extending the one of __builtin_unreachable() anyway, and it
also had a different signature, accepting one argument, compared to the
standard unreachable() with no arguments.
This change improves the chances of building mesa with the C23 standard,
which for instance is the default in recent AOSP versions.
All the instances of the macro, including the definition, were updated
with the following command line:
git grep -l '[^_]unreachable(' -- "src/**" | sort | uniq | \
while read file; \
do \
sed -e 's/\([^_]\)unreachable(/\1UNREACHABLE(/g' -i "$file"; \
done && \
sed -e 's/#undef unreachable/#undef UNREACHABLE/g' -i src/intel/isl/isl_aux_info.c
Reviewed-by: Erik Faye-Lund <erik.faye-lund@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/36437>
We should update linear_preds so that the predecessors we can remove are
actually removed.
Signed-off-by: Rhys Perry <pendingchaos02@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Schürmann <daniel@schuermann.dev>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/35202>
It might be the case that both the branch and exec mask write in a
divergent branch block are removed. try_remove_simple_block() might then
try to remove it, but fail because it has multiple logical successors.
Instead, just skip these blocks.
Signed-off-by: Rhys Perry <pendingchaos02@gmail.com>
Backport-to: 25.1
Reviewed-by: Daniel Schürmann <daniel@schuermann.dev>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/35202>
