Right now it tries to place reg_write instructions as far up the
predecessor chain as possible. This is useful for a bunch of the passes
that call it since it ensures they don't get placed in dead blocks or in
single successors and things like that. But it screws up NAK's control
flow lowering so we need the option to turn it off and make the pass
place the reg_write instructions in the most obvious place possible.
Fixes: b013d54e4f ("nak/lower_cf: Flag phis as convergent when possible")
Reviewed-by: Mel Henning <mhenning@darkrefraction.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/36914>
We can just place the set structures inside nir_block.
This reduces the number of ralloc calls by 6.7% when compiling Heaven
shaders with radeonsi+ACO using a release build (i.e. not including
nir_validate set allocations, which are also removed).
Reviewed-by: Gert Wollny <gert.wollny@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/36728>
In the C23 standard unreachable() is now a predefined function-like
macro in <stddef.h>
See https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/+/HEAD/docs/c23.md#is-now-a-predefined-function_like-macro-in
And this causes build errors when building for C23:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
In file included from ../src/util/log.h:30,
from ../src/util/log.c:30:
../src/util/macros.h:123:9: warning: "unreachable" redefined
123 | #define unreachable(str) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../src/util/macros.h:31:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/14/include/stddef.h:456:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
456 | #define unreachable() (__builtin_unreachable ())
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
So don't redefine it with the same name, but use the name UNREACHABLE()
to also signify it's a macro.
Using a different name also makes sense because the behavior of the
macro was extending the one of __builtin_unreachable() anyway, and it
also had a different signature, accepting one argument, compared to the
standard unreachable() with no arguments.
This change improves the chances of building mesa with the C23 standard,
which for instance is the default in recent AOSP versions.
All the instances of the macro, including the definition, were updated
with the following command line:
git grep -l '[^_]unreachable(' -- "src/**" | sort | uniq | \
while read file; \
do \
sed -e 's/\([^_]\)unreachable(/\1UNREACHABLE(/g' -i "$file"; \
done && \
sed -e 's/#undef unreachable/#undef UNREACHABLE/g' -i src/intel/isl/isl_aux_info.c
Reviewed-by: Erik Faye-Lund <erik.faye-lund@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/36437>
Otherwise, we could end up with phis of derefs.
Signed-off-by: Rhys Perry <pendingchaos02@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Georg Lehmann <dadschoorse@gmail.com>
Fixes: 6b4b044739 ("nir/opt_loop: add loop peeling optimization")
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/31324>
This is what callers actually want, and it simplifies nir_opt_remove_phis
because we can assume dominance meta data is valid.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Schürmann <daniel@schuermann.dev>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/31031>
Any kind of jump prevents us from moving it to the top of the loop, not
just breaks.
Signed-off-by: Rhys Perry <pendingchaos02@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Schürmann <daniel@schuermann.dev>
Fixes: 6b4b044739 ("nir/opt_loop: add loop peeling optimization")
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/31002>
If this nir_if contains continues or other breaks, we can't move it
outside the loop.
Signed-off-by: Rhys Perry <pendingchaos02@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Schürmann <daniel@schuermann.dev>
Fixes: 6b4b044739 ("nir/opt_loop: add loop peeling optimization")
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/31002>
A loop that looks like:
loop {
do_work_1();
if (cond) {
break;
} else {
}
do_work_2();
break;
}
We can't pull that break ahead of do_work_1() after hoisting the initial
do_work_1() out of the loop. So bail in this case.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/11711
Fixes: 6b4b044739 ("nir/opt_loop: add loop peeling optimization")
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/30702>
We were not restoring an outer loop as the current loop after we had
finished processing a nested loop.
Fixes: 9995f336e6 ("nir: add merge loop terminators optimisation")
Reviewed-by: Rhys Perry <pendingchaos02@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/29686>
This new pass aims to simplify loop control-flow by reducing the number
of break and continue statements. It also supersedes nir_opt_trivial_continues().
For this purpose, it implements 3 optimizations:
- opt_loop_terminator(), as previously
- opt_loop_merge_break_continue(), similar to opt_merge_breaks() incl. continues
- opt_loop_last_block(), a generalization of opt_if_loop_last_continue()
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Seurer <konstantin.seurer@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/24940>
