The next patch adds an algebraic rule that uses the constant 0xff00ff00.
Without this change, the build fails with
return hex(struct.unpack('I', struct.pack('i', self.value))[0])
struct.error: 'i' format requires -2147483648 <= number <= 2147483647
The hex() function handles integers of any size, and assigning a
negative value to an unsigned does what we want in C. The pack/unpack is
unnecessary (and as we see, buggy).
Reviewed-by: Dylan Baker <baker.dylan.c@gmail.com>
Walking the SSA definitions in order means that we consider the smallest
algebraic optimizations before larger optimizations. So if a smaller
rule is part of a larger rule, the smaller one will happen first,
preventing the larger one from happening.
instructions in affected programs: 32721 -> 32611 (-0.34%)
helped: 106
In programs whose nir_optimize loop count changes (129 of them):
before: 1164 optimization loops
after: 1071 optimization loops
Of the 129 affected, 16 programs' optimization loop counts increased.
Prevents regressions and annoyances in the next commits.
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Lima Mitev <elima@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand@intel.com>
