Xe3 adds a new pipe that handles *only* MOVs from immediate into the
scalar register.
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <None>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/32410>
This limits the address register to simple cases inside a block.
Validation ensures that the address register is only written once and
read once.
Instruction scheduling makes sure that instructions using the address
register in the generator are not scheduled while there is an usage of
the register in the IR.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Reviewed-by: Caio Oliveira <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/28199>
We want to reuse the brw::nr field as a virtual address register
identifer. So we can't use brw::file=ARF brw::nr=ADDRESS.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Caio Oliveira <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/28199>
This will translate to HDC Constant Cache loads or LSC UGM loads.
On LSC, MEMORY_MODE_UNTYPED would be fine, but for HDC we need to
distinguish between the regular and constant cache data ports.
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/32888>
This isn't used now, but future commits will add uses. Doing this as a
separate commit removes a lot of "just typing" churn from commits that
have real changes to review.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/29884>
Almost all cases now handled with default arguments. The only real
extra work that was being done was pushed to the client code in
debug_optimizer().
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/32596>
Add opcodes for VOTE_ALL, VOTE_ANY and VOTE_EQUAL. The first two
are also used for the quad variants. Move their lowering from
NIR conversion to brw_lower_subgroup_ops.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/31029>
These have now been replaced by the MEMORY_*_LOGICAL opcodes.
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Caio Oliveira <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rohan Garg <rohan.garg@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/30828>
The new MEMORY_*_LOGICAL intrinsics have a lot of control sources with
a bunch of LSC_* enums (opcode, memory type, address type, address and
data sizes), as well as flags, coordinate components vs. components...
they unfortunately are nigh-unreadable with the default printing since
there's just a string of unreadable UD immediates in some order.
To fix this, we add some basic pretty-printing. If a control source is
simply an enum whose value communicates the entire purpose, we print it.
If it has a numeric value (i.e. alignment, or data), we add a label.
For example:
memory_store(16) (null):UD store shared flat addr: %2:UD coord_comps:1u align:16u d32 comps:2u data0: %3:UD
memory_store(16) (null):UD store typed bti:%2+0.0<0>:UD addr: %3+0.0:D coord_comps:2u align:0u d32 comps:4u data0: %4:UD
This make them much easier to read.
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Caio Oliveira <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rohan Garg <rohan.garg@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/30828>
This is a new unified set of opcodes for memory access loosely patterned
after the new LSC-style data port messages introduced on Alchemist GPUs.
Rather than creating an opcode for every type of memory access, it has
only three opcodes: load, store, and atomic. It has various sources to
indicate the rest:
- Binding type (raw pointer, pointer to surface state, or BT index)
- Address size (A64, A32, A16)
- Data size (bit size, number of components)
- Opcode (atomic opcode, or LOAD/STORE vs. LOAD_CMASK/STORE_CMASK)
- Mode (typed vs. untyped vs. shared-local vs. scratch)
- Address (and its dimensionality)
- Data (0 for loads, 1 for stores, 2 for atomics)
- Whether we want block access
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Caio Oliveira <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rohan Garg <rohan.garg@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/30828>
Post-register allocation, but before brw_fs_lower_vgrfs_to_fixed_grfs,
we have registers with the VGRF file but they are actually fixed GRFs.
brw_print_instructions_to_file() was seeing VGRFs and trying to access
their size, but using bogus register numbers that could be out-of-bound.
Detect when we're post-RA and avoid doing this.
Reviewed-by: Caio Oliveira <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/30530>
