Looks like some hardware needs this info in the shader to match the
topology. Since there's no spot in the shader info for it, we're
currently using the array size of the TCS input vars to store it.
Cc: mesa-stable
Reviewed-by: Paul Dodzweit <paul.dodzweit@amd.com>
Tested-by: Paul Dodzweit <paul.dodzweit@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/16920>
DXIL validation will complain if the tess factor signature entries have the
wrong number of components for the shader's domain. Make sure that both
hull and domain shaders have the right number, and drop loads and stores
from the removed components.
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Bill Kristiansen <billkris@microsoft.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/14399>
It doesn't depend on the clc data being provided externally, so no
need to tie it there, we can re-use it for GL and Vulkan compute.
Reviewed-by: Sil Vilerino <sivileri@microsoft.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/14367>
After running the (renamed) dxil_nir_split_typed_samplers pass, the
shader will have either:
* Textures, which map to D3D SRVs
* Bare samplers, which map to D3D bare samplers
* Images, which map to D3D UAVs
There shouldn't be any remaining samplers with type information
Reviewed-by: Enrico Galli <enrico.galli@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/13390>
Whenever we have an ALU op that's operating on a double, we'll unpack
it as an integer, then repack it as a float. When we have an ALU op that
returns a double, we'll unpack it as a double, then repack it as an integer.
Then, simple algebraic opts will remove any redundant unpack/repack ops,
so we should be left with constructing and deconstructing doubles using
the right operations.
Reviewed-by: Enrico Galli <enrico.galli@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Tang <tangm@microsoft.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/10063>
As the pass's comment explains, NIR compact arrays are a better match
to represent the GLSL float[] design of clip/cull distance arrays, compared
to the float4[2] approach. This pass adjusts the variables to more closely
match what DXIL signatures would look like for that representation.
Reviewed-by: Bill Kristiansen <billkris@microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Michael Tang <tangm@microsoft.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9846>
This adds a standalone library which can convert through the pipeline of
OpenCL C -> SPIR -> SPIR-V -> NIR -> DXIL. It can add in the libclc
implementations of various library functions in the NIR phase, and
also massages the NIR to shift it more towards graphics-style compute.
This is leveraged by the out-of-tree OpenCLOn12 runtime
(https://github.com/microsoft/OpenCLOn12).
This is the combination of a lot of commits from our development branch,
containing code by several authors.
Co-authored-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Co-authored-by: Erik Faye-Lund <erik.faye-lund@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/7565>
Here's the code to emit DXIL code from NIR. It's big and bulky as-is,
and it needs to be split up a bit.
This is the combination of a lot of commits from our development branch,
containing code by several authors.
Co-authored-by: Bill Kristiansen <billkris@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Co-authored-by: Gert Wollny <gert.wollny@collabora.com>
Co-authored-by: Jesse Natalie <jenatali@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Louis-Francis Ratté-Boulianne <lfrb@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/7477>
