It is specific only to GLSL ES 3.1. From the spec, section 4.3.9
"Interface Blocks":
"Matched block names within a shader interface (as defined above) must
match in terms of having the same number of declarations with the same
sequence of types and the same sequence of member names, as well as
having the same qualification as specified in section 9.2 (“Matching
of Qualifiers“)."
But in GLSL ES 3.0 and 3.2, it is the opposite:
"Matched block names within a shader interface (as defined above) must
match in terms of having the same number of declarations with the same
sequence of types, precisions and the same sequence of member names,
as well as having the matching member-wise layout qualification as
defined in section 9.2 (“Matching of Qualifiers”)."
Fixes:
dEQP-GLES31.functional.shaders.linkage.uniform.block.differing_precision
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98243
Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli@intel.com>
There are two distinctly different uses of this struct. The first
is to store GL shader objects. The second is to store information
about a shader stage thats been linked.
The two uses actually share few fields and there is clearly confusion
about their use. For example the linked shaders map one to one with
a program so can simply be destroyed along with the program. However
previously we were calling reference counting on the linked shaders.
We were also creating linked shaders with a name even though it
is always 0 and called the driver version of the _mesa_new_shader()
function unnecessarily for GL shader objects.
Acked-by: Iago Toral Quiroga <itoral@igalia.com>
This fixes a bug that breaks cull distances. The problem
is the max array accessors can't tell the difference between
an never accessed unsized array and an accessed at location 0
unsized array. This leads to converting an undeclared unused
gl_ClipDistance inside or outside gl_PerVertex to a size 1
array. However we need to the number of active clip distances
to work out the starting point for the cull distances, and
this offset by one when it's not being used isn't possible
to distinguish from the case were only the first element is
accessed. I tried to use ->used for this, but that doesn't
work when gl_ClipDistance is part of an interface block.
So this changes things so that max_array_access is an int
and initialised to -1. This also allows unsized arrays to
proceed further than that could before, but we really shouldn't
mind as they will get eliminated if nothing uses them later.
For initialised uniforms we no longer change their array
size at runtime, if these are unused they will get eliminated
eventually.
v2: use ralloc_array (Ilia)
Reviewed-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Firstly this updates the named interface lowering pass to store the
interface without the arrays removed.
Note we need to remove the arrays in the interface/varying matching
code to not regress things but in future this should be fixed
futher as it would seem we currently successfully match interface
blocks with differnt array sizes.
Since we now know if the interface was an array we can reduce the
IR flags from_named_ifc_block_array and from_named_ifc_block_nonarray
to just from_named_ifc_block.
Next rather than having a different code path for named interface
blocks in program_resource_visitor we just make use of the one used
by UBOs this allows us to now handle arrays of arrays correctly.
Finally we add a new param to the recursion function
named_ifc_member this is because we only want to process a single
member at a time. Note that this is also the glsl_struct_field
from the original ifc type before lowering rather than the type
from the lowered variable. This fixes a bug in Mesa where we would
generate the names like WithInstArray[0].g[0][0] when it should be
WithInstArray[0].g[0] for the following interface.
out WithInstArray {
float g[3];
} instArray[2];
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Since we store some member qualifiers in the interface type
we need to be more careful about rejecting shaders just because
the pointer doesn't match. Its perfectly valid for some qualifiers
such as precision to not match across shader interfaces.
Reviewed-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
