the STORAGE_TEXEL and STORAGE_IMAGE bits can't be accurately applied due
to opengl allowing all resources to be used everywhere, so instead we can
create a separate object on demand which is used only by shaders and gets
extra barriers inferred along with the base object to avoid desync whenever
it is used
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9788>
now that batches aren't limited and flushing is less costly, there's no
reason to keep these separate
the primary changes here are removing the zink_queue enum and collapsing
related arrays which used it as an index, e.g., zink_batch_usage into single
members
remaining future work here will include removing synchronization flushes which
are no longer necessary and (eventually) removing batch params from a number of
functions since there is now only ever a single batch
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9765>
vk spec disallows mapping memory regions more than once, but we always
map the full memory range, so we can just refcount and store the pointer
onto the resource object for reuse to avoid issues here
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9725>
historically zink has been bound to 4 gfx batches and then a separate compute batch
was added. this is not ideal for a number of reasons, the primary one being that if
an application performs 5 glFlush commands, the fifth one will force a gpu stall
this patch aims to do the following, all of which are necessarily done in the same patch
because they can't be added incrementally and still have the same function:
* rewrite batch tracking for resources/views/queries/descriptors/...
|originally this was done with a single uint32_t as a bitmask, but that becomes cumbersome
to track as batch counts increase, not to mention it becomes doubly-annoying
when factoring in separate compute batches with their own ids. zink_batch_usage gives
us separate tracking for gfx and compute batches along with a standardized api for
managing usage
* flatten batch objects to a gfx batch and a compute batch
|these are separate queues, so we can use an enum to choose between an array[2] of
all batch-related objects
* switch to monotonic batch ids with batch "states"
|with the flattened queues, we can just use monotonic uints to represent batch ids,
thus freeing us from constantly using bitfield operations here and also enabling
batch counts to scale dynamically by allocating/caching "states" that represent a batch
for a given queue
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9547>
I'll be rewriting how resource tracking works, so abstracting it and removing
direct uses is going to reduce the chances of breaking things as well as code churn
plus it's a bit easier to use
downside is that until that rewrite happens, this will be a (very small) perf hit and
there's some kinda gross macros involved to consolidate code
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9626>
this really just means to nuke the counter buffer, and this can be done
by using a special bind_history bit that can be unset when the buffer has
been rebound
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9546>
this creates new backing objects for the invalidated resource and, if
needed, rebinds it to any descriptor sets it might be used in by invalidating
the descriptor state and creating new view objects
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9546>
the resource object is now a state tracker for the inner resource_object,
so it can safely be destroyed even if the backing resource is still in use
this also requires updating various things to keep descriptor states/caches working
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9544>
this was only needed to cover up some other bugs:
* missing barriers for buffer sampler/image descriptors
* weirdness with first frame handling
there's better ways of handling both cases, and now they're handled better
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9566>
this stores a number (currently 5) of backing allocations for resources
for later reuse when creating matching resources
because this is on the screen object it requires locking, but this is still
far faster than allocating new memory each time
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9540>
we can pass the offset of the 'invalid' flag directly to the resources
to let them run through and invalidate their sets in time for us to detect
it when we recycle the set during batch reset and throw it onto our allocation array
additionally, by adding refs for the actual objects used in a descriptor set, we can
ensure that our cache is as accurate as possible
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9348>
this is a lot of churn that more or less amounts to hashing the descriptor
state during draw and then performing lookups with this to determine whether
we can reuse an existing descriptor set instead of allocating one
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9348>
Use debug_printf more consistently, normalize formatting a bit, and
trace a few more places you're likely to care about.
Reviewed-By: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9436>
we have src regions for all the blit/copy/map calls, so we can use those to
verify whether we actually need to apply the clears now or if we can keep
sitting on them a while longer
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9206>
instead, we can attach the clear to the next renderpass start and even add it to
the renderpass cache for reuse
also add handling for flushing clears on map or fb switching to avoid brekaing behavior
this should save us a lot of time with potentially beginning/ending renderpasses as well
as allowing drivers to do better batching of clears by passing in all the buffers at
once
this doesn't handle deferring conditional renders yet in a futile attempt to try and keep
the size of the patch down
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9206>
when discarding the whole resource on an unused resource, we can deinit the buffer
range here
in the future, ideally we should be doing something like creating a new vk buffer/image
entirely here and demoting the existing one to a queue that destroys/caches it when
the batch finishes in order to avoid fencing
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9146>
we don't actually have to stall here, we just have to make sure the cs batch
is submitted before the subsequent buffer copy command goes into a gfx
batch in order to preserve the ordering
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9146>
if we need to sync a resource for read-only mapping, we only need to wait on
the fence that was last flagged as having writes to the resource, not batches
that may have reads, as reads don't affect memory coherency
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9146>
this now takes over from previous call sites in zink_transfer_unmap
we add a flush here if we had pending usage to ensure that the resource
gets properly synced
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9146>
this simplifies the barrier helper callsites as we no longer need
to check whether a barrier is needed beforehand in order to avoid potentially
ending a renderpass too early
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9205>
* VK_BUFFER_USAGE_STORAGE_BUFFER_BIT should be enabled always because we might need it
* VK_FORMAT_FEATURE* flags need to be used for detection
I hate these enums so much.
Fixes: 2bfa998960 ("zink: add more usage bits for buffer types")
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9175>
we need more detail on some of these to ensure proper synchronization
and availability/visibility of image data between commands/stages
the signature for needs_barrier() is still funky here to avoid breaking
usage in update_descriptors()
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/8945>
We don't need to create display-targets for shared or scanout, becuase
we never even see those in the sw-winsys case.
Reviewed-By: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/8858>
The only type that should really require to be host-visible is the
display-target, and that's just because of our silly flush_frontbuffer
implementation.
Reviewed-By: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/8858>
We only need these display-targets to be linear in the case of a
software winsys. In the DRM case, they can be tiled without issues.
Reviewed-By: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/8858>
