The vast majority of AMD GPUs (except the very first GCN) have
the same SDMA packet format, so let's just call it SDMA instead
of CIK_SDMA.
(And leave the oldest GPUs with SI_SDMA as they are now.)
Signed-off-by: Timur Kristóf <timur.kristof@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tatsuyuki Ishi <ishitatsuyuki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/26110>
This naming is more accurate and closer to the HW.
Signed-off-by: Timur Kristóf <timur.kristof@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tatsuyuki Ishi <ishitatsuyuki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/26110>
Make the naming of these defines consistent with others.
And add a few new opcodes and related definitions.
Signed-off-by: Timur Kristóf <timur.kristof@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/25769>
This packet is supported on GFX6 too, its name should relect that.
Signed-off-by: Timur Kristóf <timur.kristof@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/22406>
Add some set macro defines for mesh shading packets.
The naming convention is:
S_(packet opcode)(dword index)_FIELD_NAME
Signed-off-by: Timur Kristóf <timur.kristof@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/21409>
This will be used by SQTT to implement a workaround on GFX11
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/20529>
These set the pass and make sure we don't have multiple submissions
at the same time touching the perf counters/pass at the same time.
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/16879>
On GFX6, EOS events are always emitted with EVENT_WRITE_EOS.
On GFX7+, EOS events are emitted with EVENT_WRITE_EOS on the
graphics queue, and with RELEASE_MEM on the compute queue.
Fixes: 9c65f1f111 ("radv: synchronize Cmd{Set,Write}Event() using PS_DONE/CS_DONE events")
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/8710>
This is ported from AMDVLK, it's probably not requires unless
we want to use "real time queues", but it might be nice to just have
in place.
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
The definition of the fields differs, but PITCH_GFX9 is a mere extension
of PITCH_GFX6 that does not conflict with any other fields.
This aligns the definitions with what will be generated from the
register JSON.
The information about how large the fields really are is preserved in
the register database.
The field layout wasn't actually changed in gfx9, so having the suffix
isn't very useful. The field *contents* were changed, but this is
reflected in the V_xxx_xxx definitions and is taken into account by
the ac_debug logic based on the register JSON.
This aligns the definitions with what will be generated from the
register JSON.
This avoids syncing the Micro Engine. This is only supported
for VI+ currently. There is probably a way for using
LOAD_CONTEXT_REG on previous chips but that could be done later.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
This implementation should work and potential bugs can be
fixed during the release candidates window anyway.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
It's unnecessary because we can just check if the timestamp
is to different to the default value when a pool is created
or resetted. Instead of waiting for the availability bit to
be 1, we have to emit a not equal WAIT_REG_MEM for checking
if the timestamp is ready.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
