radeonsi: clean up ffma handling

Reviewed-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6596>
This commit is contained in:
Marek Olšák 2020-09-04 06:25:47 -04:00 committed by Marge Bot
parent 57bf4c2028
commit 758ab39d25
2 changed files with 14 additions and 5 deletions

View file

@ -853,10 +853,10 @@ static void visit_alu(struct ac_nir_context *ctx, const nir_alu_instr *instr)
}
break;
case nir_op_ffma:
/* FMA is better on GFX10, because it has FMA units instead of MUL-ADD units. */
result =
emit_intrin_3f_param(&ctx->ac, ctx->ac.chip_class >= GFX10 ? "llvm.fma" : "llvm.fmuladd",
ac_to_float_type(&ctx->ac, def_type), src[0], src[1], src[2]);
/* FMA is slow on gfx6-8, so it shouldn't be used. */
assert(ctx->ac.chip_class >= GFX9);
result = emit_intrin_3f_param(&ctx->ac, "llvm.fma", ac_to_float_type(&ctx->ac, def_type),
src[0], src[1], src[2]);
break;
case nir_op_ldexp:
src[0] = ac_to_float(&ctx->ac, src[0]);

View file

@ -937,7 +937,16 @@ void si_init_screen_get_functions(struct si_screen *sscreen)
.lower_bitfield_insert_to_bitfield_select = true,
.lower_bitfield_extract = true,
.lower_sub = true,
.fuse_ffma = true,
/* gfx6-8: use MAD (FMA is 4x slower)
* gfx9-10: either is OK (MAD and FMA have the same performance)
* gfx10.3: use FMA (MAD doesn't exist, separate MUL+ADD are 2x slower)
*
* FMA has no advantage on gfx9-10 and MAD allows more algebraic optimizations.
* Keep FMA enabled on gfx10 to test it, which helps us validate correctness
* for gfx10.3 on gfx10.
*/
.lower_ffma = sscreen->info.chip_class <= GFX9,
.fuse_ffma = sscreen->info.chip_class >= GFX10,
.lower_fmod = true,
.lower_pack_snorm_4x8 = true,
.lower_pack_unorm_4x8 = true,